Readiness, acceptance, and social presence in full online learning

Gaffar Hafiz Sagala, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
Ali Fikri Hasibuan, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia
Tuti Sriwedari, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Negeri Medan, Indonesia

Abstract


This study aimed to examine the effect of lecturer readiness in online learning on the acceptance of lecturers in online learning applications, and the effect of lecturer acceptance in online learning applications on the lecturer's perception of social presence. The subjects of this study were the lecturers at the Faculty of Economics, Universitas Negeri Medan which was taken by a total sampling technique. This study used a survey method with electronic questionnaires to collect data. Of the 113 lecturers, 81 responses were returned, and there were two incomplete questionnaires. This study had 79 responses that met the requirements of the analysis. The data were analyzed using Variance-based SEM. The results of the data analysis indicate that perceived usefulness is a critical variable in getting social presence in online learning. Meanwhile, the readiness of lecturers in online learning is an essential antecedent of the acceptance of the use of online learning applications

Keywords


online learning, social presence, MOOC

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arends, R. I. (2006). Learning to teach: Belajar untuk mengajar. Pustaka Pelajar.

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26.

Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables Wiley. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Bonifacio, A. L. (2013, June 16-19). Developing Information Communication Technology (ICT) curriculum standards for K-12 schools in the Philippines. The Sixth Conference of MIT’s Learning International Networks Consortium (LINC), MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.

Budiyani, W., & Sujarwo, S. (2020). Interactive learning multimedia: Enhancing vocabulary mastery for junior high school students. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 4(2), 295-307.

Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59(3), 1054-1064.

Cobb, S. C. (2009). Social presence and online learning: A current view from a research perspective. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 8(3).

Cooper, D. R., Schindler, P. S., & Sun, J. (2006). Business research method. McGraw-Hill.

Damayanti, S. A., Santyasa, I. W., & Sudiatmika, A. (2020). Pengaruh model problem based learning dengan flipped classroom terhadap kemampuan berfikir kreatif. Jurnal Kependidikan Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 4(1), 83-98.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 319-340.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.

Demuyakor, J. (2020). Coronavirus (COVID-19) and online learning in higher institutions of education: A survey of the perceptions of Ghanaian international students in China. Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 10(3), e202018.

Dray, B. J., Lowenthal, P. R., Miszkiewicz, M. J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Marczynski, K. (2011). Developing an instrument to assess student readiness for online learning: A validation study. Distance Education, 32(1), 29–47.

Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465.

Effiyanti, T., & Sagala, G. H. (2018). Technostress among teachers: A confirmation of its stressors and antecedent. International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 9(2), 134-148.

Fauziyah, S., & Triyono, M. B. (2020). Pengaruh e-learning edmodo dengan model blended learning terhadap minat belajar. Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 112-124.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. Sage Publications Sage CA.

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis 7th Edition Pearson Prentice Hall. JOUR.

Hamann, K., Pollock, P. H., & Wilson, B. M. (2012). Assessing student perceptions of the benefits of discussions in small-group, large-class, and online learning contexts. College Teaching, 60(2), 65-75.

Hardini, T. I., Setyarini, S., & Harto, S. (2021). Remote learning implemented by bipa teachers during Covid-19 pandemic. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 5(1).

Hayashi, R., Garcia, M., & Maddawin, A. (2020). Online learning in Sri Lanka’s higher education institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic. Asian Development Bank.

Kemendikbud. (2020). Kemendikbud Terbitkan Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Belajar dari Rumah. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2020/05/kemendikbud-terbitkan-pedoman-penyelenggaraan-belajar-dari-rumah

Kemenristekdikti, D. J. P. dan K. (2018). Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Pendidikan Tinggi di Era Industri 4.0-Dirjen Belmawa- Ristekdikti. Dirjen Belmawa-Kemenristekdikti.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge university press.

Leh, A. S. C. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and social presence in a distance learning environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(2), 109-128.

Lu, J., & Price, J. (2018). Chinese students’ ICT readiness for a blended teaching and learning environment. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2907-2914.

Mayende, G., Prinz, A., Isabwe, G. M. N., & Muyinda, P. B. (2017). Learning groups in MOOCs: Lessons for online learning in higher education. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 7(2), 109-124. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v7i2.6925

McGuinness, C., & Fulton, C. (2019). Digital literacy in higher education: A case study of student engagement with e-tutorials using blended learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 18, 1-28.

Naciri, A., Baba, M. A., Achbani, A., & Kharbach, A. (2020). Mobile learning in Higher education: Unavoidable alternative during COVID-19. Aquademia, 4(1), ep20016.

Neamtu, R. (2013). The classroom as an extension of our society: Empowering students through technology in service learning to bridge the global digital divide. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 106, 2636-2644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.304.

Nurharjanto, A. A., & Widyantoro, A. (2020). The effect of students’language learning strategy and use of technology in their productive skills’performance. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 4(2), 213-225.

Park, S. Y. (2009). An analysis of the technology acceptance model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 12(3), 150-162.

Park, S. Y., Nam, M.-W., & Cha, S.-B. (2012). University students’ behavioral intention to use mobile learning: Evaluating the technology acceptance model. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(4), 592-605.

Petko, D., Prasse, D., & Cantieni, A. (2018). The interplay of school readiness and teacher readiness for educational technology integration: A structural equation model. Computers in the Schools, 35(1), 1-18.

Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44-49.

Sagala, G. H., Hasibuan, A. F., & Suharianto, J. (2021, June). Readiness to implement digital learning. In 6th Padang International Conference on Economics Education, Economics, Business and Management, Accounting and Entrepreneurship (PICEEBA 2020) (pp. 331-338). Atlantis Press.

Sagala, G. H., & Sumiyana. (2020). The intersection of hedonic and utilitarian values on integrated-social media retailers. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 33(4), 505–530.

Sagala, G. H., Zainal, A., & Effiyanti, T. (2017). Attitude toward computer-based statistics among pre-service teacher candidates. Proceedings of MAC, 366.

Sandars, J., Correia, R., Dankbaar, M., de Jong, P., Goh, P.-S., Hege, I., Masters, K., Oh, S.-Y., Patel, R., Premkumar, K., Webb, A., & Pusic, M. (2020). Twelve tips for rapidly migrating to online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. MedEdPublish, 3068.

Siswanto, S., Kartanegara, M. A. R., & Chuan, L. S. (2021). Pengaruh penerapan asynchronous learning dan motivasi belajar terhadap hasil belajar. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 5(1).

Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115-136.

Thatcher, J. B., & Perrewe, P. L. (2002). An empirical examination of individual traits as antecedents to computer anxiety and computer self-efficacy. MIS Quarterly, 381-396.

Traxler, J. (2007). Defining, discussing and evaluating mobile learning: The moving finger writes and having write. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 8(2).

Tu, C. H., & McIsaac, M. (2002). The relationship of social presence and interaction in online classes. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 21(1), 131-150. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15389286AJDE1603_2.

Venkatesh, V., & Agarwal, R. (2006). Turning visitors into customers: A usability-centric perspective on purchase behavior in electronic channels. Management Science, 52(3), 367-382.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451-481.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Socio-cultural theory. Mind in Society, 6, 52-58.

Widhiastuti, R., & Yulianto, A. (2017). Analysis of technology acceptance model in understanding of students behavior intention in use of Sikadu. Dinamika Pendidikan, 12(1), 20-27.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v6i1.44970

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

p-ISSN: 2580-5525 || e-ISSN: 2580-5533

Indexed by:

          


Creative Commons License
Jurnal Kependidikan by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


View Journal Stats

Flag Counter