PERANAN VISUALISASI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN GERAK

Sukadiyanto Sukadiyanto

doi:10.21831/jk.v30i1.19486

PERANAN VISUALISASI DALAM PEMBELAJARAN GERAK

Sukadiyanto Sukadiyanto, , Indonesia

10.21831/jk.v30i1.19486

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to study contribution of visualization in motor learning. The research population is male and female athletes in Yognkarta. The random sampling technique is utilized to select athletes as the sample of this research. This is a survey research and the data was collected by question- noire technique. There are three (visual, auditory, and Hnesthetic) in each questionnoire. The results of this research factors indicated that the contribution of auditory visual factor is 46.91%o, and kinesthetic factor is 0.24o/o, factor is 52.85%o. The Iargest contribution in visualization among those from the Hnesthetic factor. factors The general conclusion is tlwt learning sport activities need all of those factors, but kinesthetic is the most essential one.. The reason is that learning through direct various experiences will be mueh better than through obseryation. In learning sport sHlls, it is necessary to provide feedback and use audio visual media as aids.

Keywords

Visualizafion and motor learning.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bompa, Tudoq O. (1994). Theory and methodolog,t of training: The key to athletic performance. (3'ded).

Dubuque, Iowa: Kendal/ Hunt Publishing Company. 167 Peranan Visualisasi dalam Pembelajaran Gerak

Gallwey, W. Timothy. Random House, Inc. $97$. The inner game of tennis. New York:Garfield, Charles A. (1984). Peak performance: Mental training techniques of world's greqtest athtetes. New York: A Warner Communications Company.

Gill, Diane L. (1986). Psychological dynamics of sport. Champaign, Illinois. Human Kinetics Publishers,Inc.

Keogh, Jack and Sugden, David. (1985). Child development. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.

Kerr, Robert.(1982). Psychomotor learning. New York: CBS College Publishing.

Martens, Rainer. (1983). Coaches guide to sport psychologt'. Charnpaign, Illinois: Human Kinethics Publishers Inc.

Nossek, Josef (1982). Theory and methodotog of training. Lagos: Pan African Publishers.

Porter, Kay and Foster,Judy: (1986). The mental athlete. New York: Ballantine Books.

Sage, George H. (1984). Motor learning and control: A neuropgt- 168 chotogicat approach.Dubuque, Iowa: Wm.C. BrownPublishers.

Schmidt,Richard A. (198s). Motor controlan learning: A behavior emphasis, (2"0 ed) Champaign, Illinois: Human Kinetics PublishersInc.

Shone, Ronald. (1984). Creative visualization. Northarnptoneshire: Thorsons Publishers Limited.

Wellingborough, Singarimbun, Masri dan Effendi, Sofian (Eds.). (1989). Metode pene litian survai. Jakarta, LP3ES.

Straub, william F. (1980). Sport psychologt: An analysfs of athrete behavior, (2"d ed). Ithaca, N.y: Mouvement publications.

Sukadiyanto, (1995). Perbedaan kemampuan biomotor anak normal dan anak tunarungu.Yogyakarta: IKlp

. Yogyakarta Visualisasi dalam permainan tenis lapangan, Yogakarta: FPOK IKIP Yogyakarta

(1998). Identifikosi pengaruh visualisasi olahra_ gdwan. Yogyakarta: IKIP yogyakarta.

Sutrisno Hadi. (1991). Analisis butir untuk instrumen. yogyakarta: Andi Ofset usPTA. (1984). Tennis a profesional guide. san Fransisco, fornia: Harper & Row publisher Inc.

r, cali- 169 M:.,., P e ran an l' itu al i sas t dal am P e ntb e I a1 ar an G e r ak Williams. Jean M. (Eds). (1986). 4pptied sport ps))chology. Fia Per.sonol growth to y:eak perforntance. lv{ountain View, C.A: Mavfreld Publishing Company

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v30i1.19486