Analisis multidimensional konflik agraria di Desa Lhok Gajah dalam perspektif sosiologi

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/dimensia.v13i3.75117

Keywords:

Konflik Agraria, Struktur Fungsional, Interpretatif, Konflik, Kritis.

Abstract

Marginalized communities often face structural barriers that hinder their access to the same resources, services, and opportunities as other communities. They tend to experience discrimination, oppression, and inequality in various aspects of life, making empowerment necessary to reduce such marginalization. This study aims to analyze indicators of marginalization in the community of Lhok Gajah Village through the perspectives of conflict, functionalism, interpretivism, and critical theory. The study employs a field research approach using thematic analysis. The findings reveal that agrarian conflicts in Lhok Gajah Village, Southwest Aceh, reflect the complexity of social, economic, and political dynamics involving various actors with differing interests. The conflict perspective highlights structural injustice in access to resources; functionalism views conflict as a threat to social stability; interpretive theory emphasizes social construction; while critical theory critiques structural injustice as the root of agrarian conflict in society.

References

Alfitri, Ahmad, A. R., & Awang, M. M. (2016). Pengenalan Masyarakat Marginal. Pembangunan Masyarakat Marginal, 5.

Anam, C., Felani, M., Nurkhoiron, M., Aji, N., Firmansyah, N., Arianingtyas, R., Effendi, W., Nainggolan, Y. A. P., & Zainal Abidin. (2016). Upaya Negara Menjamin Hak-Hak Kelompok Minoritas Di Indonesia (Sebuah Laporan Awal) (Pertama). Komisi NAsional Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=T4_5EAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&dq=Masyarakat+marginal+terdiri+dari+kelompok-kelompok+yang+secara+sistematis+diabaikan+dalam+proses+pembangunan,+baik+dari+segi+ekonomi,+sosial,+maupun+politik.+Kelompok-kelompok+ini

Bates, T. R. (1975). Gramsci and the Theory of Hegemony. History, 36(2), 351–366.

Berger, P., & Thomas Luckmann. (2016). The Social Construction of Reality (2 ed.).

Boggs, C. (1976). Gramsci's Marxism. Pluto Press. https://www.amazon.com/Gramscis-Marxism-Carl-Boggs/dp/0904383032

Bourdieu, P. (2018). The forms of capital. The Sociology of Economic Life, Third Edition, 78–92. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494338

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology; In qualittaive research in psychology. Uwe Bristol, 3(2), 77–101. https://psychology.ukzn.ac.za/?mdocs-file=1176

Crehan, K. (2002). Gramsci, Culture and Anthropology. University of California Press. https://search.worldcat.org/title/1010928720

Firdaus, M. A. (2023). Dampak Sosial Konflik Agraria. Osf.Io.

Forgacs, D. (1988). The Gramsci Reader. In Selected Writings 1926-1935. papers3://publication/uuid/D8584552-0373-4470-BA00-19A78DDE9B95

Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society. Social Forces, 66(4), 1124. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579442

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the Prison Notebooks.

Hobsbawm, E. (2011). How to Change the World: Reflections on Marx and Marxism. In Jurnal Sains dan Seni ITS (Vol. 6, Nomor 1). Yale University Press. http://repositorio.unan.edu.ni/2986/1/5624.pdf%0Ahttp://fiskal.kemenkeu.go.id/ejournal%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2016.06.001%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2016.12.055%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2019.02.006%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1

Marx, K. (1844). Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844. Nineteenth-Century Philosophy: Philosophic Classics, Volume IV, August 1844, 312–340. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003320609-19

Marx, K. (1867). Das Kapital (erste Auflage).

Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1848). Manifesto of the Communist Party. Nineteenth-Century Philosophy: Philosophic Classics, Volume IV, February 1848, 340–350. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315742564-9

Merton, R. K. (1968). Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Social_Theory_and_Social_Structure.html?id=dyqZOcux9o0C&redir_esc=y

Morton, A. D. (2007). Unravelling Gramsci: Hegemony and Passive Revolution in the Global Political Economy. 258–261.

Paul Farmer. (2003). Pathologies of Power Health, Human Rights, and the New War on the Poor.

Raihan, M. L. (2022). Sosialisasi Pemilu Oleh Relawan Demokrasi Untuk Peningkatkan Partisipasi Pemilih Disabilitas Di Pilkada Kota Semarang 2020. 1–29.

Ritzer, G., & Stepnisky, J. N. (2018). Sociological Theory (10 ed.). Pustaka Belajar.

Robert Chambers. (1984). Rural Develompment: putting the last first. In International Affairs (Vol. 60, Nomor 3).

Sassoon, A. S. (1980). Gramsci's Politics. St. Martin's Press. https://www.amazon.com/Gramscis-Politics-Anne-Showstack-Sassoon/dp/0312342381

Simon, R. (1985). Gramsci's Political Thought : An Introduction. London: Lawrence & Wishart 1982. https://www.abebooks.com/9780853155591/Gramscis-Political-Thought-Introduction-Simon-0853155593/plp

Sulistyowati, C. A., Afiff, S. A., Baiquni, M., & Siscawati, M. (2023). Potensi Pertanian Berbasis Dukungan Komunitas Sebagai Solusi Persoalan Petani Kecil Di Indonesia. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, 21(2), 241–261.

Thohir, M. A. (2024). Pembangunan , Kaum Miskin Kasus Penggusuran Kampung Kentingan Baru , Kota Solo. 350–372.

Thomas, P. (2009). The Gramscian Moment Philosophy, Hegemony and Marxism. https://brill.com/display/title/14765?qt-qt_product_details=0

Turner, J. H. (2002). Sociological Theory. In Reference Reviews (7 ed.). https://doi.org/10.1108/rr.2002.16.7.11.333

Wahyudi, C. (2015). Marginalisasi dan Keberadaban Masyarakat (F. R. Aliyverdana (ed.); ed. 1). Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Wallace, R. A., & Alison Wolf. (2006). Contemporary sociological theory: expanding the classical tradition (6 ed.). Prentice Hall.

Wallace, R. A., & Wolf, A. (2010). Contemporary Sociological Theory: Expanding the Classical Tradition (5 ed.). Prentice Hall, 1999.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-20

How to Cite

Br Matanari, T. P., Azwar, W., & Jamil, M. (2026). Analisis multidimensional konflik agraria di Desa Lhok Gajah dalam perspektif sosiologi. Dimensia: Jurnal Kajian Sosiologi, 13(3), 263–273. https://doi.org/10.21831/dimensia.v13i3.75117

Citation Check

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.