Reviewer Selection
DIMENSIA: Jurnal Kajian Sosiologi selects peer reviewers based on their academic qualifications, expertise, and relevance to the submitted manuscript. Reviewer selection is managed by the editorial team to ensure objective, independent, and constructive evaluation of scholarly articles.
Reviewer Selection Criteria
| 01 | Academic Expertise
Reviewers must have relevant academic knowledge, research experience, and expertise in Sociology, Sociology Education, or related disciplines corresponding to the manuscript's subject and methodology. |
| 02 | Independence and Objectivity
Reviewers are expected to provide impartial assessments and disclose any potential conflicts of interest. Institutional and professional relationships with the authors are considered during selection. |
| 03 | Availability and Professionalism
Reviewers should be able to conduct a thorough evaluation within the agreed review period and maintain confidentiality throughout the peer review process. |
| 04 | Editorial Appointment
The Editor-in-Chief or handling editor appoints reviewers according to the manuscript's requirements. If an invited reviewer declines or cannot complete the assessment, another qualified reviewer may be appointed. |
Principles of Reviewer Assignment
Reviewer selection is based on scholarly competence, independence, and suitability rather than personal relationships. DIMENSIA applies a double-blind peer review process to support fair and objective manuscript evaluation.
Related Links
Further information is available on the following DIMENSIA pages:
