Reviewer Guidelines
Reviewers of DIMENSIA: Jurnal Kajian Sosiologi are expected to provide objective, constructive, and evidence-based assessments to maintain the quality and integrity of scholarly publications in Sociology and Sociology Education.
Manuscript Evaluation Criteria
01. Originality & Relevance
Assess the originality, scholarly contribution, and relevance of the manuscript to the journal's scope.
02. Research Methodology
Evaluate the appropriateness of research design, data collection, and analytical procedures.
03. Results & Discussion
Examine the clarity of findings, depth of discussion, and consistency between evidence and conclusions.
04. References & Ethics
Assess the relevance of references, proper citation practices, and compliance with research ethics.
Reviewer Responsibilities
Reviewers must maintain confidentiality, disclose potential conflicts of interest, respect double-blind peer review, and complete evaluations within the agreed timeframe. Comments should be respectful, specific, and constructive.
Review Report & Recommendation
Reviewers should provide substantive comments identifying manuscript strengths, weaknesses, and necessary improvements. Recommendations may include acceptance, minor revision, major revision, or rejection. The final publication decision rests with the editorial team.
