ANALYSIS DIMENSIONS OF CREATIVITY IN STEM INTEGRATED PROJECT-BASED LEARNING

Prapawan Thongsri; Eko Susilowati

doi:10.21831/jk.v5i2.35306

ANALYSIS DIMENSIONS OF CREATIVITY IN STEM INTEGRATED PROJECT-BASED LEARNING

Prapawan Thongsri, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, Thailand
Eko Susilowati, Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia

10.21831/jk.v5i2.35306

Abstract

This study was aimed to analyze the dimensions of creativity in integrated project-based learning in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM). The research method uses descriptive statistical analysis. This research was conducted on students of the Physics Education Study Program in Banjarmasin. The research subjects consisted of 24 physics teacher prospective students programming Applied Physics courses. Data obtained through tests, questionnaires and interviews. Data were analyzed by calculating the normality test, difference test, andn gain. The results showed the order of increasing the percentage ofn gainin the creativity dimension from the lowest to the highest, namely the person dimension, the press dimension, the product dimension, and the process dimension. The strength of this research is to train the creativity of prospective teacher students through project creation by integrating STEM fields that combine cognitive, affective, and psychomotor abilities by exploring the problems that exist in their neighborhood. Further research on the dimensions of creativity in other learning models is needed to explore student creativity continuously and sustainably in order to produce quality resources.

Keywords

dimensions of creativity, project-based learning, STEM

Full Text:

PDF

References

Amabile, T. M. (2018). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Routledge.

Ambarini, R. (2017). Pengembangan karakter dan kreativitas anak usia dini melalui total physical response warm up game. Jurnal Kependidikan, 1(1), 150. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v1i1.9740.

Blanca, M. J., Arnau, J., López-Montiel, D., Bono, R., & Bendayan, R. (2013). Skewness and kurtosis in real data samples. Methodology: European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 9(2), 78-84. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000057.

Brown, R., Brown, J., Reardon, K., & Merrill, C. (2011). Understanding STEM: Current perceptions. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 70(6), 5. http://www.stemteacherlearning.com/uploads/topics/stemcurricula/Understanding/STEM.pdf.

Bybee, R. (2013). STEM education challenges and opportunities. NSTA Press.

Cahya, A. P., Prodjosantoso, A. K., & Wiyarsi, A. (2020). Model mental calon guru kimia pada konsep tetapan kesetimbangan dan derajat disosiasi. Jurnal Kependidikan, 3(1), 249-262. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk/article/view/26696/pdf.

Chen, C. H., Chen, H. C., & Roberts, A. M. (2019). Why humor enhances creativity from theoretical explanations to an empirical humor training program: Effective “ha-ha” helps people to “a-ha”. In Creativity and humor (pp. 83-108). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813802-1.00004-1.

Clark, B. T. (2015). Completing Christ’s afflictions: Christ, Paul, and the recon-ciliation of all things. Mohr Siebeck.

Damayanti, S. A., Santyasa, I. W., & Sudiatmika, A. R. (2020). Pengaruh model problem based-learning dengan flipped classroom terhadap kemampuan berpikir kreatif. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 4(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v4i1.25460.

Ernest, P., Skovsmose, O., Paul van Bendegem, J., Bicudo, M., Miarka, R., Kvasz, L., & Moeller, R. (2016). The philosophy of mathematics education. Springer Nature. http://library.oapen.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.12657/27750/1002255.pdf?sequence=1.

Gonzalez, H. B., & Kuenzi, J. J. (2012, August). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education: A primer. Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress. http://www.stemedcoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/05/STEM-Education-Primer.pdf.

Guillasper, J. N., Soriano, G. P., & Oducado, R. M. F. (2020). Psychometric properties of ‘attitude towards e-learning scale’among nursing students. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 30(1-3), 1-5. https:// doi: 10.31901/24566322.2020/30.1-3.1135.

Hake, R. R. (2007). Design-based research in physics education research: A review. In A. E. Kelly, R. A. Lesh, & J. Y. Baek (Eds.) (in press), Handbook of design research methods in mathematics, science, and technology education. Erlbaum.

Inchamnan, W., Wyeth, P., Johnson, D., & Conroy, D. (2012, September). A method for measuring the creative potential of computer games. In International Conference on Entertain-ment Computing (pp. 270-283). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Isaken, S. G., Dorval, K. B., & Treffinger, D. J. . (2011). Creative approaches to problem solving: A framework for innovation and change. Sage Publication.

Kamil, M. (2012). Andragogi. http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FIP/JUR._PEND._LUAR_SEKOLAH/19611109198703100MUSTOFA_KAMIL/Andragogi.pdf.

Kim, S., Chung, K., & Yu, H. (2013). Enhancing digital fluency through a training program for creative problem solving using computer programming. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 47(3), 171-199. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.30.

Klavir, R. & Gorodetsky, K. (2011). Features of creativity as expressed in the construction of new analogical problems by intellectual gifted students. Creative Education, 2(3), 164-173. http:// doi:10.4236/ce.2011.2302.

Komalasari, K., Saripudin, D., & Masyitoh, I. S. (2014). Living values education model in learning and extracurricular activities to construct the students’ character. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(7). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.971.1175&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Kuan-Chen, T. (2018). An empirical examination of the relationships among creativity, the evaluation of creative products, and cognitive style among Chinese undergraduates. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 6(1), 53. https://doi:10.5937/ijcrsee1801053T

Maemunah, M. S., & Maryuningsih, Y. (2013). Penerapan model sains teknologi masyarakat (STM) pada pokok bahasan pencemaran lingkungan untuk meningkatkan kreativitas siswa kelas X di MAN 2 Cirebon. Scientiae Educatia: Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 2(2), 149-162. https://doi:10.24235/sc.educatia.v2i2.525.

Maintjes, H., & Grosser, M. . (2010). Creative thinking in prospective teachers: The status quo and the impact of contextual factors. South African Journal of Education, 30, 361-380. https://doi: 10.15700/saje.v30n3a360.

Munandar, U. (2012). Pengembangan kreativitas anak berbakat. PT Rineka Cipta.

Munteanu, A., Costea, I., Palos, R., & Jinaru, A. (2010). Entering in the essences of personality–studies over archetypes. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 2272-2276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.448

Nurhidayati, N., & Kustini, S. (2018). Pengembangan bahan ajar bahasa Inggris berbasis keterampilan abad 21 pada perguruan tinggi vokasi: Sebuah kajian literatur. In Proceeding of National Conference on Asbis, 3, 417-424. http://e-prosiding.poliban.ac.id/index.php/asbis/article/view/336.

Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2010). Assessment of creativity. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.005.

Putra, R. W. Y. (2017). Analisis proses berpikir kreatif dalam memecahkan masalah matematika ditinjau dari tipe kepribadian guardian dan idealis. Nabla Dewantara: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 52-65. http://ejournal.unitaspalembang.ac.id/index.php/nabla/article/view/18.

Putri, N. L. P. N. S., Artini, L. P., & Nitiasih, P. K. (2017). Project-based learning activities and EFL students’ productive skills in English. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(6), 1147-1155. http://academypublication.com/ojs/index.php/jltr/article/view/jltr080611471155.

Reisman, F. (2013). Introduction to creativity: Process, product, personality, environment & technology. Creativity: Product, Process, Personality, Environment and Technology, 9-26. http://kiecon.org/Creativity/Book/2013/FREDRICKA/REISMAN.pdf.

Reis, S. M., & Peters, P. M. (2020). Research on the schoolwide enrichment model: Four decades of insights, innovation, and evolution. Gifted Education International, 0261429420963987. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261429420963987.

Runco, M. A., & Albert, R. S. (2010). Creativity research: A historical view. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511763205.003.

Sanders, M. E. (2012). Integrative STEM education as “best practice”. Griffith Institute for Educational Research, Queensland, Australia. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/handle/10919/51563.

Slough, S. W., & Milam, J. O. (2013). Theoretical framework for the design of STEM project-based learning. In STEM Project-Based Learning (pp. 15-27). Brill Sense. https://brill.com/view/book/edcoll/9789462091436/BP000004.xml.

Sholahuddin, A., Sholihah, A., & Susilowati, E. (2020, January). Can the guided inquiry with environment learning resources increase conceptual under-standing and scientific literacy? In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1422(1), 012038). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/ 1422/1/012038/meta.

Solidayah, W. (2015). Uji modifikasi peringkat bertanda wilcoxon untuk masalah dua sampel berpasangan (Doctoral dissertation). Fakultas Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, UNISBA, Bandung.

Sternberg, R. J. (2012). The assessment of creativity: An investment-based approach. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 3-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.652925.

Susilowati, E., Hartini, S., Mayasari, T., & Winarno, N. (2018). Profile habits of mind students in physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1120(1), 012055). https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/ 1120/1/012055/meta.

Susilowati, E., Miriam, S., Suyidno, S., Sholahuddin, A., & Winarno, N. (2020). Integration of learning science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in the wetland environment area to increase students’ creativity. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1491(1), 012047. https:// doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1491/1/012047.

Triyono, Senam, Jumadi, & Wilujeng, I. (2017). The effects of creative problem solving-based learning towards students’ creativities. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(2), 214-225. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk/article/view/9429.

Tsai, K. C. (2015). A framework of creative education. Education, 21(1), 137-155. https://ineducation.ca/ineducation/article/view/193.

Utomo, E. N. P. (2018). Pengembangan modul berbasis inquiry lesson untuk meningkatkan literasi sains dimensi proses dan hasil belajar kompetensi keterampilan pada materi sistem pencernaan kelas XI. Biosfer: Jurnal Tadris Biologi, 9(1), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.24042/biosf.v9i1.2878.

Widhiarso, W. (2017). Uji normalitas. Diunduh dari https://repository.ugm.ac.id.

Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., Riandi, Fadly, W., Wibowo, W. S., Susilowati, E., Mayasari, T., Andi, H. J., & Afifah, R. M. A. (2019). The problem of pre-service science teachers on Newton’s Laws topic: A case study. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology February(2019), 28-38. http://jestec.taylors.edu.my/Special/Issue/on/AASEC/02018/AASEC_SIS_004.pdf.

Winarno, N., Rusdiana, D., Susilowati, E., & Afifah, R. M. A. (2020). Implementation of integrated science curriculum: A critical review of the literature. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(2), 723-745. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.675722.

Wiyarsi, A., & Çalik, M. (2019). Revisiting the scientific habits of mind scale for socio-scientific issues in the Indonesian context. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2430-2447. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1683912

Wulansari, A., & Winarko, E. (2017). Ekstraksi ciri dan klasifikasi data EKG multivariate time series. Phasti: Jurnal Teknik Informatika Politeknik Hasnur, 3(01), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.46365/pha.v3i01.195.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v5i2.35306