BEHIND THE CHANGE OF THE NATIONAL EXAMINATION POLICY IN INDONESIA
Abstract
low (<50%) and high absorption (≥ 50%). The results showed that the overall absorption of the NE had decreased significantly over the past 5 years (2013 to 2017). There did not find out of difficult material before implementation of Curriculum 2013. However, the last 5 years (after the period of implementation Curriculum 2013) have found several difficulties. Moreover, since 2015, almost all the materials on mathematics NE were categorized as difficult after the changing in the status of the NE (not a determinant factor of students’ graduation) and
implementation the computer-based test. The difficult materials were probability, geometry transformations, space geometry, calculus, circles, linear programs, and statistics. Generally, the difficulties were in narrative problem-solving questions or using real-world contexts. Also, the results showed non-cognitive impacts (students’ motivation) as the result of the policy changing, especially the status and technical implementation of the NE
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anazifa, R. D., & Djukri. (2017). Project-based learning and problem-based learning: are they effective to improve student’s
thinking skills? Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(2), 346-355. https://doi.
org/10.15294/jpii.v6i2.11100.
Apino, E., & Retnawati, H. (2017). Developing instructional design to
improve mathematical higher order thinking skills of students. Journal
of Physics: Conference Series, 812, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-
/755/1/011001.
Azis, & Sugiman. (2015). Analisis kesulitan kognitif dan masalah afektif siswa SMA dalam belajar matematika menghadapi ujian nasional. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(2), 162-174. https://
journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jrpm/article/view/7331/6314.
Balitbang Kemdikbud RI. (2008). Laporan hasil ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2007-2008 [software]. Balitbang Kemdikbud RI.
Balitbang Kemdikbud RI. (2009). Laporan hasil ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2008-2009 [software]. Balitbang Kemdikbud RI.
Balitbang Kemdikbud RI. (2010). Laporan hasil ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2009-2010 [software]. Balitbang Kemdikbud RI.
Balitbang Kemdikbud RI. (2011). Laporan hasil ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2010-2011 [software]. Balitbang Kemdikbud RI.
Balitbang Kemdikbud RI. (2012). Laporan hasil ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2011-2012 [software]. Balitbang Kemdikbud RI.
Balitbang Kemdikbud RI. (2013). Laporan hasil ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2012-2013 [software]. Balitbang Kemdikbud RI.
Balitbang Kemdikbud RI. (2014). Laporan hasil ujian nasional 2014. [Research and Development Board, Ministry of Education, Republik Indonesia. (2014). Report of National Examination 2014] [Software].
Balitbang Kemdikbud RI. (2015). Laporan hasil ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2014-2015 [software]. Balitbang Kemdikbud RI.
Balitbang Kemdikbud RI. (2016). Laporan hasil ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2015-2016 [software]. Balitbang Kemdikbud RI.
Balitbang Kemdikbud RI. (2017). Laporan hasil ujian nasional tahun pelajaran 2016-2017 [software]. Balitbang Kemdikbud RI.
Debuse, J. C. W., & Lawley, M. (2016). Benefits and drawbacks of computer-based assessment and feedback systems: Student and educator perspectives. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(2), 294-301. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12232.
Diaz Maggioli, G. H. (2018). Web-based testing. In The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching (pp. 1-6). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0362.
Djidu, H., & Jailani, J. (2017). Aktivitas pembelajaran matematika yang dapat melatih kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa. PRISMA, Prosiding
Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1(1), 312-321. https://journal.unnes.
ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/21614.
Djidu, H., & Jailani, J. (2018). Developing problem based calculus learning
model. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 2(1), 68-84. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v2i1.12689.
Djidu, H., & Retnawati, H. (2018). Cultural values-integrated mathematical
learning model to develop HOTS and character values. In E. Retnowati,
A. Ghufron, Marzuki, Kasiyan, A. C. Pierawan, & Ashadi (Eds.),
Character Education for 21st Century Global Citizens: Proceedings of
the 2nd International Conference on Teacher Education and Professional
D e v e l o p m e n t ( I N C O T E P D 2017) (pp. 36-370). Routledge.
https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9781138099227.
Ebel, R. L., & Frisbie, D. A. (1991). Essentials of educational measurement.
Educational Researcher. Prentice-Hall International, Inc.
Farhan, M., & Retnawati, H. (2014). Keefektifan PBL Dan IBL ditinjau
dari prestasi belajar, kemampuan representasi matematis, dan motivasi
belajar. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 227-239. https://doi.
org/10.21831/jrpm.v1i2.2678.
Goodson-Espy, T., Cifarelli, V. V., Pugalee, D., Lynch-Davis, K., Morge, S.,
& Salinas, T. (2014). Applying NAEP to improve mathematics content and methods courses for preservice elementary and middle school teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 114(8), 392-404. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12093.
Huriaty, D., & Mardapi, D. (2014). Akurasi metode kalibrasi fixed parameter: studi pada perangkat ujian nasional mata pelajaran matematika. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(2), 188-201. http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpep.
Isgiyanto, A. (2012). Dasar dan ketuntasan atribut butir soal ujian nasional
matematika model Rasch. Jurnal Kependidikan, 42(2), 110-117.
Kartowagiran, B. (2008). Dimensional validity of mathematics test in the
national exam for junior secondary school (SMP) 2003-2006. Jurnal
Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 12(2), 177-195.
Listiani, W. (2016). The enhancement of mathematical critical thinking
skills and self-efficacy at senior high school students through learning-based problems contextual model. Journal of Mathematics Education, 1(2 July), 55-61. http://usnsj.com/index.php/JME/article/view/JME009/pdf.
Logan, T. (2015). The influence of test mode and visuospatial ability on
mathematics assessment performance. Mathematics Education Research
Journal, 27(4), 423-441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-015-0143-1.
Nitko, A. J., & Brookhart, S. M. (2011). Educational assessment of student. Pearson Education, Inc.
Novferma, N. (2016). Analisis kesulitan dan self-efficacy siswa SMP dalam
pemecahan masalah matematika berbentuk soal cerita. Jurnal Riset
Pendidikan Matematika, 3(1), 76-87. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.
v3i1.10403 Permalink/.
O’Leary, M., Scully, D., Karakolidis, A., & Pitsia, V. (2018). The state-of-the-art in digital technology-based assessment. European Journal of Education, 53(2), 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12271.
Prayitno, A., Nurjana, E. F., & Khasanah, F. (2017). Karakterisasi scaffolding berdasarkan kesalahan berpikir siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 1(1), 50-66.
Retnawati, H. (2014). Perbandingan metode penyetaraan skor tes menggunakan butir bersama dan tanpa butir bersama. Jurnal Kependidikan, 46(2), 164-178.
Retnawati, H., Djidu, H., Kartianom, K., Apino, E., & Anazifa, R. D. (2018).
Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning
strategy. Problem of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215-230. http://oaji.net/articles/2017/457-1524597598.pdf.
Retnawati, H., Hadi, S., Nugraha, A. C., Arlinwibowo, J., Sulistyaningsih, E.,
Djidu, H., Apino, E., & Iryanti, H. D. (2017). Implementing the computer-
based national examination in Indonesian schools: The challenges and
strategies. Problem of Education in the 21st Century, 75(6), 612-633. http://oaji.net/articles/2017/457-1513710818.pdf.
Retnawati, H., Kartowagiran, B., Arlinwibowo, J., & Sulistyaningsih,
E. (2017). Why are the mathematics national examination items difficult
and what is teachers’ strategy to overcome it? International Journal of
Instruction, 10(3), 257-276. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10317a.
Rosa, P. H. P., & Gunawan, R. (2015). The clustering of high schools based
on national and school examinations. International Conference on Data
and Software Engineering (ICoDSE), 231-236.
Rumasoreng, M. I., & Sugiman. (2014). Analisis kesulitan matematika siswa SMA/MA dalam menyelesaikan soal setara UN di Kabupaten Maluku
Tengah. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 22-34.
Saukah, A., & Cahyono, A. E. (2015). Ujian nasional di Indonesia dan
implikasinya terhadap pembelajaran bahasa inggris. Jurnal Penelitian Dan
Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(2), 243-255. http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/
jpep.
Saylor, G. (1974). How to use the findings from national assessment. NASSP Bulletin, 58(383), 63-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263657405838309.
Shute, V. J., & Rahimi, S. (2017). Review of computer-based assessment for learning in elementary and secondary education. Journal of Computer
Assisted Learning, 33(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12172.
Sulistiawan, C. H. (2016). Kualitas soal ujian sekolah matematika program
ipa dan kontribusinya terhadap hasil ujian nasional. Jurnal Penelitian Dan
Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(1), 1-10. http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/
jpep.
Suwarto. (2017). Pengembangan tes ilmu pengetahuan alam terkomputerisasi. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(2), 153-161. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpep/article/view/13144.
Tias, A. A. W., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2015). Analisis kesulitan siswa SMA dalam
pemecahan masalah matematika kelas XII IPA di kota Yogyakarta. Jurnal
Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 28-39. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.
php/jrpm/article/view/7148/6165
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v5i2.44712
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
p-ISSN: 2580-5525 || e-ISSN: 2580-5533
Indexed by:
View My Stats
Jurnal Kependidikan by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View Journal Stats