Call for Papers Focus & Scope Author Guidelines Template: Title Page Template: Anonymised Manuscript Template: Statement of Originality Online Submission Peer Review Process Publication Ethics Generative AI Policy Plagiarism Policy Authorship Policy Conflict of Interest Correction and Retraction Post-Publication Discussions Research Misconduct Open Access Policy Archiving Policy Author Fees Copyright Notice Ownership and Management Editorial Team Reviewers Journal History Abstracting & Indexing Helpdesk Editor 1 Helpdesk Editor 2 Editor-in-Chief
Post-Publication Discussions and Corrections
Efisiensi welcomes scholarly discussion of its published articles. This policy explains how readers can comment on or raise concerns about an article, and how the journal responds. Corrections and retractions follow the Correction and Retraction policy.
1. Forms of Discussion
- Letters to the editor: short, evidence-based comments on a published article (up to 1,000 words). Accepted letters are published with a reply from the authors where possible.
- Comments by email: questions about methods, data, or interpretation, which the editor may pass to the authors.
- Concerns about integrity: reports of possible errors, plagiarism, data problems, or other misconduct (see Section 3).
2. Requirements for Comments
- Comments must concern the scholarly content of the article and be respectful.
- They must give reasons and evidence, and name the article by title and DOI.
- The writer must give their name and affiliation. Anonymous comments are considered only when they raise integrity concerns with clear evidence.
- Personal attacks, defamatory statements, and commercial promotion are not accepted.
3. Procedure
- Send the letter, comment, or concern to efisiensi@uny.ac.id, with the subject “Post-publication comment”.
- The editor acknowledges receipt within 7 days and assesses the submission.
- Letters suitable for publication are sent to the authors, who may reply within 30 days. The letter and reply are reviewed by the editor and published together, linked to the original article.
- If the comment shows an error or possible misconduct, the editor follows the Correction and Retraction policy or the Research Misconduct policy.
- The person who raised the comment is told the outcome.
4. Roles
| Party | Responsibility |
|---|---|
| Readers | Raise comments and concerns responsibly, with evidence. |
| Authors | Respond promptly and in good faith; provide data on request; cooperate with corrections. |
| Editors | Assess comments fairly and confidentially; publish discussions and notices; keep the record accurate. |
| Publisher | Supports the editors and ensures that notices are linked and deposited with Crossref. |
Sources
- Committee on Publication Ethics. (2017). Core practices. https://publicationethics.org/core-practices
- COPE Council. (2019). Retraction guidelines (Version 2). https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.4


















