Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Student-Centered Learning dan Kemampuan Spasial terhadap Kreativitas Mahasiswa

Aan Ardian, Jurusan Pendidikan Teknik Mesin Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Sudji Munadi, Jurusan Pendidikan Teknik Mesin Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


This study aims at investigating the difference of creativity between the students treated with the Student-Centered Learning (SCL) strategy and the students treated with the Direct Learning strategy. It was a quasi-experimental study employing the non-equivalent control group design. It was conducted using the 2x2 factorial design. The research population were 40 students attending the course of Fabrication Construction Design. The results of the study showed that (1) The creativity of the students using the SCL strategy attained mean scores of 42.65, higher than the students using the Direct Learning strategy with mean scores of 39. (2) The students with high spatial ability using the SCL strategy attained mean scores of 49, higher than the students using the Direct Learning strategy with mean scores of 36.3. (3) The students with low spatial ability using the SCL strategy attained mean scores of 36.3, lower than the students using the Direct Learning strategy with mean scores of 41.70. (4) There was an interaction between the learning strategy and the spatial ability in terms of the effect on the creativity.

Keywords


Creativity, Spatial Ability, Student-Centered Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bonnardel, N. and Zenasni, F. 2010. The Impact of Technology on Creativity in Design: An Enhancement? Creativity and Innovation Management.19 (2)

Ginting, Rosnani. 2010. Perancangan Produk. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu

Hadi, R. 2007. Dari Teacher-Centered Learning ke Student-Centered Learning: Perubahan Metode Pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal Pemikiran Alternatif Pendidikan, INSANIA. 12(3), 408-419

Harrison J.K, David Lubinski, Camilla P. B. and James H.S. 2013. Creativity and Technical Innovation: Spatial Ability’s Unique Role. Psychological Science. 24 (9), 1831–1836

Harsono. 2006. Kearifan dalam Transformasi Pembelajaran: Dari Teacher-Centered ke Student Centered Learning. Jurnal Pendi-dikan Kedokteran dan Profesi Kesehatan Indonesia, I (1)

Hesson, M., and Shad, K.F. 2007. A Student-Centered Learning Model. American Journal of Applied Sciences. 4 (9), 628-636

O’Neill, G., and McMahon, T. 2005. Student–Centred Learning: What Does It Mean for Students and Lecturers? Dalam O’ Neill, G., Moore, S. & McMullin, B. (Eds.). Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching (27-36). Dublin: AISHE

Parwata, I.G.L.A. 2008. Penerapan Model Pem-belajaran Langsung Berbantuan Media Vcd Untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa pada Perkuliahan Atletik. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pen-didikan. 2 (1), 35-52

Peterson, P.L. 1979. Research on Teaching: Con-cept, Finding and Implication. Madison: McCutchan Pu Corp Publisher

Shan, H.J. 2003. Identification and Development of Creativity. New Delhi: Commonwealth Pu-blisher

Sternberg, R.J., at.el. 2005. Creativity dalam Hol-yoak, K.J., & Morrison, R.G. The Cam-bridge Handbook of Thinking and Rea-soning (351-369). New York: Cambridge University Press




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jptk.v22i4.7843

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan



 

Online (e-ISSN): 2477-2410 || Printed (p-ISSN): 0854-4735


Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi Kejuruan by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jptk was distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Supported by:

Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Managemen

Social Media: