Developing the adaptive materials based on learning style to increase student's conceptual understanding

Lukman Hakim; Patricia Hotma Minar Lubis; Wacharaporn Khaokhajorn

doi:10.21831/jk.v6i1.47735

Developing the adaptive materials based on learning style to increase student's conceptual understanding

Lukman Hakim, Universitas PGRI Palembang, Indonesia
Patricia Hotma Minar Lubis, Universitas PGRI Palembang, Indonesia
Wacharaporn Khaokhajorn, Science Education Department, Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University

10.21831/jk.v6i1.47735

Abstract

This study aimed to develop an adaptive electrical material based on Felder Silverman's learning style that can improve students' conceptual understanding. The method used in this research was the ADDIE research and development method which consists of the analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation stages. The data were gathered using learning style tests, concept understanding tests, and questionnaires. The data were then analyzed using descriptive analysis and N-gains. The analysis of the improvement of electrical learning outcomes used normalized gains. Based on the explanation, it can be concluded that the dominant student learning style characteristics are visual and sensing. The test results of the quality of electrical teaching materials with an average of 85.38 categories are very feasible. The results of the conceptual understanding test of students who received adaptive electricity material with an average N-gains of 0.7 categories were very high. The highest N-gains are students with visual and verbal learning styles, namely, 0.72. Based on the combination of the Felder Silverman learning style model, it is 0.73 for students with visual sensing learning style types.

Keywords

electrical learning material, learning style, concept understanding

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmed, M., & Hina, S. (2019). The presentation of adaptive content based on Felder Silverman learning style. Technical Journal, University of Engineering and Technology (UET), 24(4), 35-46.

Ain, N. U., Kaur, K., & Waheed, M. (2016). The influence of learning value on learning management system use: An extension of UTAUT2. Information Development, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666915597546.

Bire, A. L., Geradus, U., & Bire, J. (2014). Effects of visual, auditorial, and kinesthetic learning styles on student learning achievement. Jurnal Kependidikan, 44(2), 168-174.

Chang, R. I., Hung, Y. H., & Lin, C. F. (2015). Survey of learning experiences and influence of learning style preferences on user intentions regarding MOOCs. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 528-541.

Chania, D. M. P., Medriati, R., & Mayub, A. (2020). Pengembangan bahan ajar fisika melalui pendekatan STEM berorientasi hots pada materi usaha dan energi. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 3(2), 109-120. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.3.2.109-120.

Christudas, B. C. L., Kirubakaran, E., & Thangaiah, P. R. J. (2018). An evolutionary approach for personalization of content delivery in e-learning systems based on learner behavior forcing compatibility of learning materials. Telematics and Informatics, 5(3), 520-533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.02.004.

Denphaisarn, N. (2014). A new framework for e-learning using learning style and personality. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 13(1), 145-159.

El Guabassi, I., Bousalem, Z., Al Achhab, M., Jellouli, I., & El Mohajir, B. E. (2018). Personalized adaptive content system for context-Aware ubiquitous learning. Procedia Computer Science, 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.01.142

Fasihuddin, H., Skinner, G., & Athauda, R. (2017). Towards adaptive open learning environments: Evaluating the precision of identifying learning styles by tracking learners’ behaviours. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 807-825.

Firdaus, L., Hunaepi, H., Muliadi, A., & Fitriani, H. (2020). Respons mahasiswa terhadap pembelajaran online pada masa pandemi covid-19. Empiricism Journal, 1(2), 60-65.

Glushkova, T. (2015). Personalization and user modeling in adaptive e-learning systems for schools. In B. Gradinarova (Ed.), E-Learning - Instructional Design, Organizational Strategy and Management (pp. 127-147). https://doi.org/10.5772/61084

Hakim, L., Setiawan, A., & Sinaga, P. (2016). Designing Adaptive-Content trough E-learning on Electromagnetic Concept. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 755(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/755/1/011001

Hakim, L., Sinaga, P., & Setiawan, A. (2018). Pengembangan konten materi listrik magnet adaptif untuk calon guru. 3(1), 120-126.

Handayani, N. A., & Jumadi. (2021). Analisis pembelajaran IPA secara daring pada masa pandemi covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains Indonesia, 9(2), 217-233. https://doi.org/10.24815/jpsi.v9i2.19033.

Hashim, H., Salam, S., Nurul, S., & Mohamad, M. (2017). Investigating learning styles for adaptive Massaive Open Online Cource (MOOC) learning. Journal of Advances in Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(5), 282-292. https://doi.org/10.20474/jahss-3.5.4.

Kaymakamoğlu, S. E. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs, perceived practice and actual classroom practice in relation to traditional (Teacher-centered) and constructivist (Learner-centered) teaching (Note 1). Journal of Education and Learning, 7(1), 29-37. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n1p29

Khuluq, K., Abidin, Z., & Ulfa, S. (2021). Pengaruh model pembelajaran group investigation terhadap hasil belajar ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa kelas XI IPS. JKTP: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 4(2), 197-206. https://doi.org/10.17977/um038v4i22021p197

Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S., & Johnson, E. (2016). Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers and Education, 95, 174-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.01.001

Lonn, S., Teasley, S. D., & Krumm, A. E. (2011). Who needs to do what where?: Using learning management systems on residential vs. commuter campuses. Computers and Education, 56(3), 642-649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.006

Milana, L., & Jannati, E. D. (2018). Inovasi model pembelajaran problem based learning dengan visualisasi virtual untuk meningkatkan pemahaman konsep pada matakuliah Fisika Dasar I. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 3(1), 19-23. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v3i1.10933.

Mukaromah, D., Sugiyo, & Mulawarman. (2018). Keterlibatan siswa dalam pembelajaran ditinjau dari efikasi diri dan self regulated learning. Indonesian Journal of Guidance and Counseling: Theory and Application, 7(2), 14-19.

Nasser, R., Cherif, M., & Romanowski, M. (2011). Factors that impact student usage of the learning management system in qatari schools. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 12(6), 39-62. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v12i6.985.

Newton, P. M., & Miah, M. (2017). Evidence-based higher education - Is the learning styles “myth” important? Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 444. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00444

Nindiasari, H., Novaliyosi, & Subhan, A. (2016). Desain didaktis tahapan kemampuan dan disposisi berpikir reflektif matematis berdasarkan gaya belajar. Jurnal Kependidikan, 46(2), 219-232.

Pangestu, R. D., Mayub, A., & Rohadi, N. (2019). Pengembangan desain media pembelajaran fisika SMA berbasis video pada materi gelombang bunyi. Jurnal Kumparan Fisika, 1(1), 48-55. https://doi.org/10.33369/jkf.1.1.48-55.

Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality journal of educational psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 785-797. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000241.

Pertiwi, F. N. (2019). Pembelajaran fisika berbasis mastery learning dan react. Ed-Humanistics, 04(01), 450-463.

Pratama, R. A., & Saregar, A. (2019). Pengembangan lembar kerja peserta didik (LKPD) berbasis scaffolding untuk melatih pemahaman konsep. Indonesian Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(1), 84-97. https://doi.org/10.24042/ijsme.v2i1.3975.

Sa’adah, U., & Ariati, J. (2018). Hubungan antara student engagement (Keterlibatan siswa) dengan prestasi akademik mata pelajaran Matematika pada siswa kelas XI SMA Negeri 9 Semarang. Empati, 7(1), 69-75.

Sadhasivam, J., & Babu, R. (2017). MOOC: A framework for learners using learning style. International Education and Research Journal, 3(2), 21-24. http://ierj.in/journal/index.php/ierj/article/view/691.

Sanita, N., Elisa, E., & Susanna, S. (2021). Hubungan kemandirian belajar terhadap hasil belajar siswa pada pembelajaran fisika di SMAN 1 Syamtalira Bayu. Jurnal Serambi Akademica, 9(6), 857-864. http://www.ojs.serambimekkah.ac.id/serambi-akademika/article/view/3086.

Serin, H. (2018). A comparison of teacher-centered and student-centered approaches in educational settings. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 5(1), 164-167. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v5i1p164.

Setiawan, T., Sudomo, R. I., & Hasanah, F. N. (2019). Adaptive Hypermedia System Development Based on Moodle to Overcome the Diversity of Learning Style on Vocational Education in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1273(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1273/1/012005

Shchedrina, E., Valiev, I., Sabirova, F., & Babaskin, D. (2021). Providing adaptivity in moodle LMS courses. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(2), 95-107. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i02.18813.

Sinaga, P., Suhandi, A., & Liliasaric. (2014). Improving the ability of writing teaching materials and self-regulation of pre-service physics teachers through representational approach. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 5(1), 80-94. http://gssrr.org/index.php?journal=JournalOfBasicAndApplied.

Susilawati, S., Yasin, A. F., & Hambali, M. (2020). Model pembelajaran blended learning untuk meningkatkan kualitas belajar mahasiswa Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 4(1), 329-341.

Tatar, N., & Şeker, M. (2019). The effects of learning styles of pre-service teachers on their skills to prepare sketchnotes. Education and New Developments, 1, 165-168. https://doi.org/10.36315/2019v1end035.

Tristanti, D. D. T., & Sudarti. (2021). Electromagnetic waves spectrum in physics students. Pancasakti Science Education Journal, 6(2), 46-51. https://doi.org/10.24905/psej.v6i2.38.

Wati, D. A., Hakim, L., & Lia, L. (2021). Pengembangan e-LKPD interaktif hukum newton berbasis mobile learning menggunakan live worksheets di SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(2), 72-80. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpf.v10i2.26567.

Widiawati, S., Hikmawati, H., & Wahyudi, W. (2018). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe group investigation (GI) terhadap hasil belajar fisika ditinjau dari gaya belajar siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 4(1), 40-48. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v4i1.459.

Widiyatmoko, A. (2018). The effectiveness of simulation in science learning on conceptual understanding: A literature review. Journal of International Development and Cooperation, 24(1), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.15027/45251.

Widyaningsih, S. W., & Yusuf, I. (2020). Implementation of project-based learning (PjBL) assisted by e-learning through lesson study activities to improve the quality of learning in physics learning planning courses. International Journal of Higher Education, 19(1), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n1p60.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v6i1.47735