ARTIKEL ILMIAH SEBAGAI SUMBER PEMBELAJARAN BIOKIMIA

Syahmani Syahmani; Rahmat Eko Sanjaya

doi:10.21831/jk.v5i1.29847

ARTIKEL ILMIAH SEBAGAI SUMBER PEMBELAJARAN BIOKIMIA

Syahmani Syahmani, Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia
Rahmat Eko Sanjaya, Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Kependidikan Universitas Lambung Mangkurat, Indonesia

10.21831/jk.v5i1.29847

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pemanfaatan artikel ilmiah dalam pembelajaran biokimia di perguruan tinggi pada konsep metabolisme energi. Penelitian ini menggunakan desain penelitian One Group Pretest-Posttest. Subjek penelitian adalah 22 mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Kimia FKIP Universitas Lambung Mangkurat. Dua proses pembelajaran yang dilakukan pada penelitian ini mengacu kepada pembelajaran aktif, yaitu mahasiswa belajar secara terarah dan dilakukan secara mandiri (Direct Study/DS), kemudian secara kelompok untuk mendiskusikan hasil pekerjaan mandiri (Discussion Group/DG). Data yang diperoleh dalam penelitian adalah hasil belajar mahasiswa berupa pretest dan posttest dan kuesioner. Data tersebut kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan perbedaan yang siginifikan antara pretest dan posttest setelah pembelajaran menggunakan artikel ilmiah sebagai sumber pembelajaran biokimia. Peningkatan pretest dan posttest menghasilkan nilai n-gain yang berada pada kategori “sedang”. Rata-rata nilai persepsi dan komitmen mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran dengan menggunakan artikel ilmiah berada pada kategori “sedang”. Hal ini mengindikasikan bahwa pembelajaran biokimia pada topik metabolisme energi dengan menggunakan artikel ilmiah memberikan dampak positif terhadap hasil belajar dan minat mahasiswa.

SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES AS BIOCHEMISTRY LEARNING RESOURCES

This study aims to determine the use of scientific articles in biochemical learning in higher education, especially on the energy metabolism concept. This study used a One Group Pretest-Posttest research design. The research subjects were 22 students of the Chemistry Education Study Program FKIP Universitas Lambung Mangkurat. Two learning processes carried out in this study refer to active learning, namely students learn in a focused and independent manner (Direct Study/DS), then in groups to discuss the results of independent work (Discussion Group/DG). The data obtained in the study were student learning outcomes in the form of pre-test and post-test and questionnaires. The data were then analyzed qualitatively and quantitatively. The results show a significant difference between the pre-test and post-test after learning using scientific articles as a source of biochemistry learning. The increase in pre-test and post-test resulted in an n-gain value that was in the "medium" category. The average value of students' perceptions and commitments in learning using scientific articles is in the "medium" category. This indicates that learning biochemistry on the topic of energy metabolism using scientific articles has a positive impact on student learning outcomes and interest.

Keywords

artikel ilmiah, sumber pembelajaran, biokimia

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akram, M. (2013). Mini-review on glycolysis and cancer. Journal of Cancer Education, 1(1), 1-4. doi: 10.1007/s13187-013-0486-9.

Anderson, W. L., Mitchell, S. M., & Osgood, M. P. (2008). Gauging the gaps in the students problem-solving skills: Assessment of individual and group use of problem-solving strategies using online discussions. Life Sciences Education, 7, 254-262.

Avikasari, Rukayah, & Indriayu, M. (2018). Keefektifan penggunaan bahan ajar science literacy terhadap peningkatan prestasi belajar. Jurnal Kependidikan, 2(2), 221-234. doi: 10.21831/jk.v2i2.19167.

Bell, E. (2001). The future of education in the molecular life sciences. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology, 16, 221-225. https://doi.org/10.1038/35056610.

Bobich, J. A. (2008). Active learning of biochemistry made easy (for the teacher). Journal of Chemical Education, 85, 234-236.

Cicuto, C., Pazinato, M., & Torres, B. (2019). Teaching metabolism with scientific articles: A new approach. Biochemistry and Molecuar Biology, 47(1), 85-92. doi:10.1002/bmb.21187.

Cornely, K. (1999). Journal articles as case studies: the new England journal of medicine on lactose intolerance. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29(2), 114-119.

Drake, B. D., Acosta, G. M., & Smith, R. L. (1997). An effective technique for reading reearch articles-The Japanese KENSHU method. Journal of Chemical Education, 74(2), 186-188. doi:10.1021/ed074p186.

Duch, B. J. (2001). Writing problems for deeper understanding. Dalam B. J. Duch, S. E. Groh, & D. E. Allen, The power of problem-based learning (pp. 47-53). Stylus.

Duch, B. J., Groh, S. E., & Allen, D. E. (2001). Why problem-based learning? A case study of institutional change in undergraduate education. Dalam B. J. Duch, S. E. Groh, & D. E. Allen, The power of problem-based learning (pp. 3-11). Stylus.

Duncan, A. P., & Johnson, R. S. (2007). A “classic papers” approach to teaching undergraduate organometallic chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(3), 443-446.

Espadiola, M. B., El-Bacha, T., Giannella, T. R., Struchiner, M., da Silva, W. S., & da Poian, A. T. (2010). Teaching energy metabolisme using scientific articles. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 38(2), 97-103. doi:10.1002/bmb.20386.

Fortner, R. W. (1999). Using cooperative learning to introduce undergraduates to professional literature. Journal of College Science Teaching, 28(4), 261-265.

Gegner, J. A., Mackay, D. H., & Mayer, R. E. (2009). Computer-suported aids to maing sense of scientific articles: Cagnitive, motivational, and attitudinal effects. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 79-97.

Glazer, F. S. (2000). Journal clubs—a successful vehicle to science literacy: reversing roles in the classroom with student-led discussions of primary literature. Journal of College Science Teaching, 29(5), 320-324.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain scores. American Educational Research Association’s Division D, Measurement and Research Methodology.

Hartman, A. K., Borchardt, J. N., & Bozer, A. L. (2017). Making primary literature come alive in the classroom. The Journal of Undergraduate Neuro-science Education, 15(2), R24-R28.

Houde, A. (2000). Student symposia on primary research articles: A window into the world of scientific. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(3), 184-187.

Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1998). Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 30(4), 26-35. doi:10.1080/00091389809602629.

Kozeracki, C. A., Carey, M. F., Colicelli, J., & Levis-Fitzgerald, M. (2006). An intensive primary-literature–based teaching program directly benefits undergraduate science majors and facilitates their transition to doctoral programs. CBE Life Sciences Education, 5(4), 340-347. doi:10.1187/cbe.06-02-0144.

Krebs, H. A., Camb., M. A., & Hamburg, M. D. (1937). The intermediate metabolism of carbohydrate. The Lacet, 736-738.

Levine, E. (2001). Reading your way to scientific literacy: Interpreting scientific articles through small-group discussions. Journal of College Science Teaching, 31(2), 122-125.

Mulnix, A. B. (2003). Investigations of protein structure and function using the scientific literature: An assignment for an undergraduate cell physiology course. Cell Biology Education, 2(4), 248-255.doi:10.1187/cbe.03-06-0025.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.

Rahayu, R., & Laksono, E. W. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajar-an IPA berbasis problem-based learning di SMP. Jurnal Kependidikan, 45(1), 29-43. doi: 10.21831/jk.v45i1.7184.

Roberts, J. (2009). An undergraduate journal club experience: A lesson in critical thinking. Journal of College Science Teaching, 38(3), 28-31.

Roecker, L. (2007). Introducing students to the scientific literature. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(8), 1380-1384. doi:10.1021/ed084p1380.

Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2004). Foundation of problem-based learning. Open University Press.

Se, A. B., Passos, R. M., Ono, H. A., & Hermes-Lima, M. (2008). The use of multiples tools for teaching medical biochemistry. Advances in Physiology Education, 32, 188-192.

Uden, L., & Beaimont, C. (2006). Technology ang problem-based learn-ing. Information Science Publishing.

Ullrich, L. E., Krafnick, A. J., Dumanis, S. B., & Forcelli, P. A. (2012). Drugs, the brain, and behavior: A graduate student-run comprehensive course in neuroscience. The Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 10(2), A105-A112.

Walczak, M. M., & Jackson, P. T. (2007). Incorporating information literacy skills into analytical chemistry: an evolutionary step. Journal of Chemical Education, 84(8), 1385-1390. doi:10.1021/ed084p1385.

White, H. B. (2002). Why does my cruorine change color? Journal of College Science Teaching, 31, 106-111.

Willard, A. M., & Brasier, D. J. (2014). Controversies in neuroscience: a literature-based course for first year undergraduates that improves scientific confidence while teaching concepts. The Journal of Undergraduate Neuro-science Education, 12(2), A159-A166

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v5i1.29847