Evaluasi pelaksanaan teaching factory SMK di Surakarta
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v2i3.1040Keywords:
teaching factory, learning, production proccessAbstract
Evaluasi pelaksanaan teaching factory SMK di Surakarta bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana proses pelaksanaan teaching factory SMK di Surakarta. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif dengan pendekatan evaluasi model formatif-sumatif oleh Scriven yang menekankan pada evaluasi formatif. Populasi penelitian adalah semua SMK di Surakarta yang menjalankan teaching factory berjumlah 9 sekolah dan respondennya adalah 81 guru pengampu kompetensi keahlian yang menjalankan teaching factory di sekolah tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pelaksanaan teaching factory SMK di Surakarta ditinjau dari kegiatan pembelajaran dinyatakan sangat baik (17,28%) oleh 14 guru, baik (39,51%) oleh 32 guru, tidak baik (25,93%) oleh 21 guru, dan sangat tidak baik (17,28%) oleh 14 guru. Sedangkan hasil pelaksanaan teaching factory SMK di Surakarta ditinjau dari proses produksi dinyatakan sangat baik (14,81%) oleh 12 guru, baik (27,16%) oleh 22 guru, tidak baik (44,44%) oleh 36 guru, dan sangat tidak baik (13,58%) oleh 11 guru.
AN EVALUATION OF SMK TEACHING FACTORY IN SURAKARTA
An evaluation of the teaching factory implementation in vocational high schools (VHSs) in Surakarta aims to find out he teaching factory implementation process in VHSs in Surakarta. This was a descriptive study with the formative-sumative evaluation model by Scriven emphasizing on the formative evaluation. The population comprised all 9 VHSs in Surakarta carrying out the teaching factory. The respondents were 81 teachers involved in the teaching factory. The results of the evaluation show that the teaching factory in VHSs in Surakarta for the learning activity component is very good (17.28%, 14 respondents), good (39.51%, 32 respondents), poor (25.93%, 21 respondents), and very poor (17.28%, 14 respondents), and for the production proccess component it is very good (14.81%, 12 respondents), good (27.16%, 22 respondents), poor (44.44%, 36 respondents), and very poor (13.58%, 11 respondents).
References
Depdiknas. (2012). Panduan Pelaksanaan, Tahun 2012, tentang Bantuan Pengembangan Kewirausahaan SMK/teaching industry.
Direktorat Pembinaan SMK. (2011). Data Pokok SMK. Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional, p. 1. Retrieved from http://datapokok.ditpsmk.net/index.php?aksi=12&page=3
Dobson, Graeme. (2003). A Guide to Writing Competency Based Training Materials. Melbourne: National Volunteer Skills Centre.
E. Mulyasa. (2006). Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi - Konsep, Karakteristik, dan Implementasi. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Hadlock, H., Wells, S., Hall, J., et al. (2008). From Practice to Entrepreneurship: Rethinking the Learning Factory Approach. Proceedings of The 2008 IAJC-IJME International Conference, ISBN 978-1-60643-379-9.
Herminarto Sofyan. (2008). Optimalisasi Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi pada Pendidikan Kejuruan. Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar, disampaikan pada Rapat Terbuka Senat Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Sabtu 16 Februari 2008.
Iwan Harianton & Agus S. Saefudin. (2010). Alternative Approach to Deliver Competence Higher Skills Technicians from Diploma Program in Indonesian Higher Educations toward Global Competition. Proceedings of the 1st UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training Bandung, Indonesia, 73-81.
Lamancusa, John S., Jorgensen, Jens E., Zayas-Castro, Jose L., et al. (1995). The learning factory–a new approach to integrating design and manufacturing into engineering curricula. ASEE Proceedings, Anaheim, California, 2262.
Lamancusa, John S., Zayas, Jose L., Soyster, Allen L., et al. (2008). The Learning Factory: industry-Partnered Active Learning. Journal of Engineering Education.
Moerwismadhi. (August 2009). Teaching Factory Suatu Pendekatan dalam Pendidikan Vokasi yang Memberikan Pengalaman ke Arah Pengembangan Technopreneurship. Paper presented at Seminar Nasional Technopreneurship Learning For Teaching Factory, Malang Jawa Timur.
Rogers, Glyn, & Badham, Linda. (2005). Evaluation in Schools: Getting Started on Training and Implementation. New York: Routledge.
State Board of Education. (1997). Production Work Handbook: A Handbook for Administering Production Work Activities in Workforce Development Education Programs. North Carolina: State Board of Education.
Sudiyanto, G.S., Yoga, S., Ibnu. (2011). Teaching Factory di SMK ST. Mikael Surakarta. Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Suharsimi Arikunto & Safruddin Abdul Jabar. (2009). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Upon acceptance of the manuscript, the corresponding author will be required to complete and sign the Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Publishing Agreement before the article proceeds to publication.
The Publishing Agreement Form can be downloaded here:
Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Publishing Agreement
The signed agreement should be submitted electronically to the Editorial Office via email:
Authors retain the copyright of their work while granting Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi a non-exclusive license to publish, distribute, and identify itself as the original publisher of the article.
All articles published by Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, adaptation, and reproduction in any medium, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s), a link to the license is provided, and any derivative works are distributed under the same license.
Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpv is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
