Vocational education reform across the Taiwan Strait: A comparative analysis of governance scale and institutional ecology

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v16i1.97938

Keywords:

comparative education, governance scale, institutional ecology, Mainland China, vocational education

Abstract

This study compares vocational education reform in Taiwan and Mainland China to explain why similar reform goals are translated into different institutional practices. Previous cross-strait studies have often examined the two systems separately or compared individual policy measures, while paying limited attention to the institutional logic linking governance scale, institutional ecology, and industrial transition pathways. Using qualitative empirical document analysis within a comparative case-study design, the study analysed 35 core policy, legal, statistical, institutional, and academic sources. Documentary evidence was coded using an integrated  covering governance structure, system scale and institutional composition, curriculum and major adjustment, industry–education cooperation, teacher development, and digital transformation. The findings reveal convergence in the shared emphasis on applied talent cultivation, practical learning, and stronger industry linkages, but divergence in the institutional mechanisms through which these objectives are implemented. Taiwan’s relatively smaller and more diversified technical and vocational education system promotes flexible learning pathways, private institutional participation, and industry–academia collaboration, whereas Mainland China’s large-scale system emphasizes national coordination, strategic programme restructuring, school–enterprise cooperation, and workforce development aligned with industrial upgrading. The study contributes an integrated six-dimensional comparative framework for analysing vocational education reform in culturally connected yet institutionally distinct contexts and provides practical insights for context-sensitive policy learning and vocational education reform.

References

Antonietti, C., Cattaneo, A., & Amenduni, F. (2022). Can teachers’ digital competence influence technology acceptance in vocational education? Computers in Human Behavior, 132, 107266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107266

Bailey, W., Lavender, K., Youde, A., & Jiao, J. (2024). Experiences from great vocational education policy change in China - a teacher perspective. International Journal of Training Research, 22(1), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2024.2332350

Billett, S. (2011). Vocational education. Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1954-5

Bray, M., Adamson, B., & Mason, M. (2014). Comparative education research (M. Bray, B. Adamson, & M. Mason (eds.); Vol. 19). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05594-7

Cattaneo, A. A. P., Antonietti, C., & Rauseo, M. (2022). How digitalised are vocational teachers? Assessing digital competence in vocational education and looking at its underlying factors. Computers & Education, 176, 104358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104358

Cattaneo, A. A. P., Antonietti, C., & Rauseo, M. (2025). How do vocational teachers use technology? The role of perceived digital competence and perceived usefulness in technology use across different teaching profiles. Vocations and Learning, 18(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-025-09359-4

Deschênes, M., Dionne, L., & Parent, S. (2024). Supporting digital competency development for vocational education student teachers in distance education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1452445. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1452445

Fuller, A., & Unwin, L. (2003). Learning as apprentices in the contemporary UK workplace: creating and managing expansive and restrictive participation. Journal of Education and Work, 16(4), 407–426. https://doi.org/10.1080/1363908032000093012

Greinert, W.-D. (2005). Mass vocational education and training in Europe: Classical models of the 19th century and training in England, France and Germany during the first half of the 20th (Vol. 118). Nicholson. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/5157_en.pdf

Hu, X., Ke, S., & Han, G. (2018). The characteristics of vocational education in Taiwan and its enlightenment to Mainland China. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Humanities (ICCESSH 2018), 476–480. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccessh-18.2018.106

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355

Luo, T., Ma, H., & Wei, Z. (2026). A cross-strait perspective: A study on the development of new-generation vocational education teacher training and faculty team building — a comparative analysis between Mainland China and Taiwan, China. Global Education Development Study, 2(1), 14–23. https://ojs.bbwpublisher.com/index.php/GEDS/article/view/14431

Mende, C., Oswald-Egg, M. E., & Caves, K. (2025). Vocational education and training (VET) system governance: A systematic literature review. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 77(5), 1419–1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2025.2461586

Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2022). The National Vocational Education Smart Education Platform officially launched. https://www.moe.gov.cn/fbh/live/2022/54324/mtbd/202203/t20220329_611906.html

Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. (2024). Educational statistics in 2023. https://en.moe.gov.cn/documents/statistics/2023/national/

Ministry of Education of the Republic of China. (2026). Guidelines for technical and vocational education policies. https://english.moe.gov.tw/fp-10-20555-03d82-1.html

Ministry of Education of the Republic of China (Taiwan). (2011). Technological and vocational education in Taiwan, ROC. Ministry of Education. https://gpi.culture.tw/books/2010002059

Ministry of Education of the Republic of China (Taiwan). (2024). Education in Taiwan 2024/2025. https://english.moe.gov.tw/fp-127-39682-8de98-1.html

National People’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China. (2022). Vocational education law of the People’s Republic of China. http://en.npc.gov.cn.cdurl.cn/2022-04/20/c_909970.htm

OECD. (2023). Education at a Glance 2023. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en

Phillips, D., & Ochs, K. (2004). Researching policy borrowing: Some methodological challenges in comparative education. British Educational Research Journal, 30(6), 773–784. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192042000279495

Pilz, M. (2016). Typologies in comparative vocational education: Existing models and a new approach. Vocations and Learning, 9(3), 295–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12186-016-9154-7

Rahmawati, S., Prestridge, S., Abdullah, A. G., & Widiaty, I. (2025). Unpacking the digital competence challenge in vocational education: A case from Indonesia. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101803

Rauner, F., & Maclean, R. (2008). Handbook of technical and vocational education and training research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8347-1

Reich, A., Rooney, D., & Lizier, A. L. (2021). Using technology integration frameworks in vocational education and training. International Journal of Training Research, 19(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2020.1864447

Roll, M. J. J., & Ifenthaler, D. (2021). Multidisciplinary digital competencies of pre-service vocational teachers. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 13(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-021-00112-4

Subrahmanyam, G. (2020). UNESCO-UNEVOC study on the trends shaping the future of TVET teaching. https://doi.org/10.54675/MMQE7367

Subrahmanyam, G. (2022). Trends mapping study: Digital skills development in TVET teacher training. UNESCO–a global leader in education. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380899

The State Council of the People’s Republic of China. (2026). China’s vocational education changes amid push for new quality productive forces. https://english.www.gov.cn/news/202411/23/content_WS6741110cc6d0868f4e8ed56d.html

UNESCO. (2016). Recommendation concerning Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET), 2015. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000245178

Weltbank. (2020). Demand-driven skills training and results-based contracting. World Bank, Washington, DC. https://doi.org/10.1596/33556

World Bank. (2018). Technical and vocational education and training: Lessons from China. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2018/10/30/technical-and-vocational-education-and-training-lessons-from-china

Yu, B., Li, R., Zhang, S., Mao, P., Xu, C., Shi, J., & Wu, G. (2025). Constraints, mechanisms, and strategies for industry-education integration in vocational education: An empirical study. PLOS One, 20(12), e0339158. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0339158

Zhao, D., & Selvaratnam, D. P. (2024). A systematic literature review on the reform of vocational education in China. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2343525

Zhou, Y., & Xu, G. (2023). Vocational School–Enterprise Cooperation in China: A Review of Policy Reforms, 1978–2022. ECNU Review of Education, 6(3), 433–450. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231167895

Downloads

Published

2026-06-29

How to Cite

Zheng, X., Liu, K., Yao, Y., & Cai, K. (2026). Vocational education reform across the Taiwan Strait: A comparative analysis of governance scale and institutional ecology. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 16(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v16i1.97938

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.