Evaluating vocational education policy in a disadvantaged region: Evidence from a CIPP-based study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v15i3.95734

Keywords:

CIPP evaluation model, Disadvantaged regions, Stakeholder satisfaction, Vocational education policy, Workload management

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of vocational education policy at SMK Maharati, a vocational high school located in a disadvantaged (3T: frontier, outermost, and underdeveloped) region of Indonesia, using the Context–Input–Process–Product (CIPP) evaluation model. This study employed an evaluative mixed-methods approach and analyzed secondary data from four institutional stakeholder satisfaction reports involving educators, educational staff, students, parents, and industry partners (IDUKA) during the 2024/2025 academic year. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, one-sample t-tests, Pearson correlation analysis, and regression analysis, while qualitative data were analyzed using thematic content analysis. The findings reveal a clear dichotomy between external and internal stakeholder satisfaction. Parents, students, and industry partners consistently reported high levels of satisfaction, particularly regarding student character, work ethic, and industry-relevant competencies. In contrast, educators and educational staff reported only moderate levels of satisfaction, with compensation and workload emerging as the primary sources of dissatisfaction. Statistical analysis confirmed a significant negative relationship between perceived workload and salary satisfaction, indicating structural weaknesses in human resource management. The study concluded that vocational education policy at SMK Maharati is externally effective yet internally fragile, relying heavily on the goodwill of educators rather than sustainable institutional systems. Integrated reforms in human resource management, workload management, and internal coordination are essential to ensure long-term sustainability of vocational education quality in disadvantaged regions.

References

Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In Motivation and work behavior (pp. 267–299). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60108-2

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cedefop. (2020). Vocational education and training in Europe, 1995–2035: Scenarios for European vocational education and training in the 21st century. Cedefop Reference Series, 114. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/3083_en.pdf

Cedefop. (2023). Microcredentials for labour market education and training: Microcredentials and evolving qualifications systems. Publications Office of the European Union. https://www.cedefop.europa.eu/files/5589_en.pdf

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publication. https://www.google.co.id/books/edition/Designing_and_Conducting_Mixed_Methods_R/6tYNo0UpEqkC?hl=en&gbpv=0

Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203847909

Frye, A. W., & Hemmer, P. A. (2012). Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE Guide No. 67. Medical Teacher, 34(5), e288–e299. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.668637

Grollmann, P., & Rauner, F. (2007). International perspectives on teachers and lecturers in technical and vocational education (P. Grollmann & F. Rauner (eds.)). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5704-5

Harvey, L., & Williams, J. (2010). Fifteen years of quality in higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 16(1), 3–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538321003679457

Lincoln, Y., & Guba., E. (1985). Establishing trustworthiness. Naturalistic inquiry. CA: Sage. https://ethnographyworkshop.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/lincoln-guba-1985-establishing-trustworthiness-naturalistic-inquiry.pdf

McGrath, S., Mulder, M., Papier, J., & Suart, R. (2019). Handbook of vocational education and training (S. McGrath, M. Mulder, J. Papier, & R. Suart (eds.)). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94532-3

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2023). Education at a glance 2023. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/e13bef63-en

Pradipta, B. Q., Hirawan, F. B., & Ragamustari, S. K. (2021). Evaluation of policy in the vocational education system revitalization in Indonesia: Examining the teaching factory readiness of the industry. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 11(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v11i1.37693

Ratnaya, G., Indriaswuri, R., Widayanthi, D. G. C., Atmaja, I. M. P. D., & Dalem, A. A. G. P. K. P. (2022). CIPP evaluation model for vocational education: A critical review. Education Quarterly Reviews, 5(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.05.03.519

Reznikova, L., Labanino, R., & Mathews, D. M. (2024). Pooling our strengths (316th ed., OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers). https://doi.org/10.1787/b73697cb-en

Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher self-efficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.006

Squicciarini, M., & Nachtigall, H. (2021). Demand for AI skills in jobs: Evidence from online job postings. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (2012). Systematic evaluation: A self-instructional guide to theory and practice. Springer Science & Business Media.

Stufflebeam, Daniel L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications. John Wiley & Sons.

Tikly, L., & Barrett, A. M. (2013). Education quality and social justice in the global south. Education Quality and Social Justice in the Global South. Challenges for Policy, Practice and Research, 11–24. https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/books/mono/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324/9780203817650&type=googlepdf

UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre for Technical and Vocational Education and Training. (2020). Innovating technical and vocational education and training: A framework for institutions. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization and UNESCO-UNEVOC International Centre for Technical and Vocational Education and Training. https://unevoc.unesco.org/pub/innovating_tvet_framework.pdf

Utami, P., Fajaryati, N., Sudira, P., Ismail, M. E., Maneetien, N., & Felestin, F. (2024). The role of teacher in industry 5.0, technology, and social capital in for vocational high school graduates in school-to-work transitions. Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education), 9(1), 113–133. https://doi.org/10.21831/elinvo.v9i1.72485

Wheelahan, L. (2021). Doctoral theses abstracts in vocational education. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 73(4), 607–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2021.2023042

Wulandari, H. T., Susanto, H., Muhibbin, A., & Susilo, A. (2025). Evaluasi pendidikan vokasi di era revolusi industri 4.0 dan society 5.0. Paedagogie, 20(2), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.31603/paedagogie.v20i2.15010

Zhou, S., Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A. (2024). Factors associated with teacher wellbeing: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 36(2), 63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09886-x

Downloads

Published

2025-08-25

How to Cite

Dianto, A., Ghufron, A., Hakim, S. R., Setiana, D. S., & Boriboon, G. (2025). Evaluating vocational education policy in a disadvantaged region: Evidence from a CIPP-based study. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 15(3), 309–321. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v15i3.95734

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.