Integrating Krathwohl’s taxonomy into digital self-assessment: Psychometric validation of a civic affective scale for secondary education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v23i2.96277Keywords:
affective domain, civic education, digital self-assessment, Krathwohl taxonomy, psychometric validationAbstract
This study develops and evaluates a digital self-assessment tool to measure students' affective domain in Civics Education at the senior high school level. The research addresses the lack of measurement of affective outcomes in civic and character education. Although the affective dimension is an important part of the curriculum, most teachers lack reliable tools to document students' value internalisation. Using a Research and Development design with the ADDIE framework, the tool was built on Krathwohl's taxonomy of the affective domain and supported by attitude theory, social cognitive theory, and the concepts of global citizenship and character education. Content validity was assessed using Aiken's V with five experts, followed by empirical testing with 182 participants in the pilot test and 498 participants in the field test. Item-total correlation and Cronbach's alpha were used to assess item performance and internal consistency, with reliability coefficients between 0.706 and 0.804. EFA revealed a general affective factor while retaining five theoretically relevant factors: receiving, responding, valuing, organisation, and characterisation. CFA proved that the measurement model is acceptable (CMIN/df = 2.545; CFI = 0.927; TLI = 0.916; RMSEA = 0.056); however, AGFI slightly failed the strict 0.90 criterion. This research contributes both a context-relevant yet globally applicable civic affective scale and an illustration of digital self-assessment for evidence-based affective assessment, while addressing issues such as social desirability and cross-cultural validity.
References
Aiken, L. R. (1985). Three coefficients for analyzing the reliability and validity of ratings. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45(1), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164485451012
Allen, K., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Waters, L. (2017). School belonging and the role of social and emotional competencies in fostering an adolescent’s sense of connectedness to their school. In E. Frydenberg, A. J. Martin, & R. J. Collie (Eds.), Social and emotional learning in Australia and the Asia-Pacific: Perspectives, programs and approaches (pp. 83–99). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3394-0_5
Andrade, H. L. (2019). A critical review of research on student self-assessment. Frontiers in Education, 4, Article 87. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00087
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-L
Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2014). Research-based fundamentals of the effective promotion of character development in schools. In L. Nucci, D. Narvaez, & T. Krettenauer (Eds.), Handbook of moral and character education(2nd ed., pp. 248–260). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203114896.ch14
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838020
Huang, Z., Zhang, J., & Yuan, Z. (2024). What matters for students’ learning? The roles of social and emotional skills and the factors affecting these skills. ECNU Review of Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241227453
Immordino-Yang, M. H., & Damasio, A. (2007). We feel, therefore we learn: The relevance of affective and social neuroscience to education. Mind, Brain, and Education, 1(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228X.2007.00004.x
Jose, P. E., Ryan, N., & Pryor, J. (2012). Does social connectedness promote a greater sense of well-being in adolescence over time? Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2012.00783.x
Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: Affective domain. David McKay.
Lavidas, K., Papadakis, S., Manesis, D., Grigoriadou, A. S., & Gialamas, V. (2022). The effects of social desirability on students’ self-reports in two social contexts: Lectures vs. lectures and lab classes. Information, 13(10), Article 491. https://doi.org/10.3390/info13100491
Mahoney, J. L., Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2018). An update on social and emotional learning outcome research. Phi Delta Kappan, 100(4), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0031721718815668
Mahoney, J. L., Weissberg, R. P., Greenberg, M. T., Dusenbury, L., Jagers, R. J., Niemi, K., Schlinger, M., Schlund, J., Shriver, T. P., VanAusdal, K., & Yoder, N. (2021). Systemic social and emotional learning: Promoting educational success for all preschool to high school students. American Psychologist, 76(7), 1128–1142. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000701
Memon, M. A., Ting, H., Cheah, J.-H., Ramayah, T., Chuah, F., & Cham, T. H. (2020). Sample size for survey research: Review and recommendations. Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling, 4(2), i–xx. https://doi.org/10.47263/JASEM.4(2)01
Nucci, L., Narvaez, D., & Krettenauer, T. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of moral and character education (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203114896
OECD. (2021). Beyond academic learning: First results from the Survey of Social and Emotional Skills. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/92a11084-en
Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2006). The content validity index: Are you sure you know what’s being reported? Critique and recommendations. Research in Nursing & Health, 29(5), 489–497. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20147
Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1116
Setiawati, F. A., Widyastuti, T., Fathiyah, K. N., & Nabila, T. S. (2024). Minimizing social desirability in questionnaires of non-cognitive measurements. European Journal of Psychology and Educational Research, 7(1), 33–43. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejper.7.1.33
Trentini, C., Tambelli, R., Maiorani, S., & Lauriola, M. (2022). Gender differences in empathy during adolescence: Does emotional self-awareness matter? Psychological Reports, 125(2), 913–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120976631
UNESCO. (2015). Global citizenship education: Topics and learning objectives. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000232993
Yan, Z., & Carless, D. (2022). Self-assessment is about more than self: The enabling role of feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(7), 1118–1128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.2001431
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors agree to transfer the transfer copyright of the article to The Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan effective if and when the paper is accepted for publication.
Authors and other parties are bound to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License for the published articles, legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA).
