How reviewers are selected. Reviewers are chosen at random on the basis of their expertise: for each manuscript, the editors identify scholars whose research and publications match its topic and method, and select reviewers at random among those who meet the criteria set by Jurnal Civics, namely relevant expertise, no conflict of interest with the authors, and availability to review within the deadline. Each manuscript is reviewed double-anonymously. See Reviewer Selection.

Jurnal Civics thanks the following scholars for their time, expertise, and constructive feedback in reviewing manuscripts submitted to the journal. This list acknowledges every reviewer who has reviewed a manuscript for Jurnal Civics, whether the article was eventually accepted or rejected. Reviews follow the Peer Review Process and are double-anonymous: reviewers are never linked to the manuscripts they reviewed.

Scholars in civic education, citizenship, and related fields are invited to apply. See Become a Reviewer  ·  Peer Review Process  ·  Editorial Team