Community policy model in preventing pedophilia crimes in the community on an ongoing basis from the perspective of community citizenship policy

Authors

  • Bayu Suseno Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian, Indonesia
  • M Mustofa Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian, Indonesia
  • Puspitasari Puspitasari Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian, Indonesia
  • Ricardi S. Adnan Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Kepolisian, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v23i1.95958

Keywords:

criminal profiling, child protection, pedophilia

Abstract

This study was prompted by the alarming prevalence of sexual violence against children in Indonesia and the continued dominance of repressive approaches in dealing with pedophilia crimes. Historically, public policy responses have focused excessively on criminalisation and law enforcement, with the police as the main actor. This study uses a qualitative approach based on a literature review, utilising the interactive analysis model includes data reduction, conceptual data display, and conclusion drawing through cross-source verification. The findings indicate that addressing the multidimensional complexity of pedophilia requires a preventive governance structure involving six key sectors ( hexahelix model): the government acts as a regulator and legal supervisor; academics providing an evidence-based foundation through empirical research; the business sector contributing with technological innovations for protection and corporate social responsibility (CSR); the media shaping public opinion and conducting educational campaigns; communities acting as agents of daily social supervision and early detection; and civil society organizations (CSOs) focusing on policy advocacy and victim mediation. Optimising this cross-sector collaboration effectively builds a strong social ecosystem grounded in citizen responsibility, the core values of Pancasila, and the strengthening of participatory social control. In addition, this study proposes a practical, operational syntax structured into five integrated stages to ensure the systematic implementation and sustainability of the model. This research contributes to the conceptual and practical development of civic education as a preventive public policy tool, grounded in active citizen participation, to create an environment that protects children.

References

Bestari, P. (2020). The essence of public policies in learning for civic education. Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2019), 243–246. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200320.047

Brodny, J., & Tutak, M. (2025). Towards a sixfold helix model for green smart cities? A conceptual exploration of stakeholder collaboration, interaction mechanisms, and role allocation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 11(4), 100681. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2025.100681

Dinasty, P. A., Priyanto, H., & Hentika, N. P. (2025). Perlindungan perempuan bawah umur dari perilaku pedofilia: Suatu penerapan model kolaborasi pentahelix. Nusantara Hasana Journal, 3(10), 40–50. https://nusantarahasanajournal.com/index.php/nhj/article/view/1385

Fahmi, R., & Suryadi, K. (2024). The relationship between well-being, social engagement, and the role of the state in realizing civic happiness. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 21(2), 182–190. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v21i2.70840

Hambali, A. R., & Arief, A. (2025). Reformulasi kebijakan pencegahan pedofilia berbasis komunitas: Perspektif hukum pidana dan perlindungan anak di Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 8(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v8i1.7948

Herrenkohl, T. I., Leeb, R. T., & Higgins, D. (2016). The public health model of child maltreatment prevention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 17(4), 363–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016661034

Kusnadi, K. (2024). Filantropi berbasis pendidikan kewarganegaraan: pembelajaran untuk memperkuat karakter kepedulian sosial warga negara. Jurnal Civic Hukum, 9(2), 166-181. https://doi.org/10.22219/jch.v9i2.32108

Lase, F., & Lase, B. (2025). Pemberdayaan masyarakat melalui pendidikan kewarganegaraan dalam meningkatkan partisipasi sosial. JIIP – Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 8(8), 9852–9857. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v8i8.9079

McVeigh, M. J., & Heward-Belle, S. (2024). Analysing the scientific literature on policing approaches to disrupt child sexual exploitation. Policing: A Journal of Policy and Practice, 18. https://doi.org/10.1093/POLICE/PAAE088

Nanggala, A. (2025). Model pendidikan kewarganegaraan berbasis community civic untuk memperkuat civic competence mahasiswa dan memberdayakan masyarakat. Tekmulogi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 5(2), 119–128. https://doi.org/10.17509/tmg.v5i2.90419

Park, J., & Hong, A. J. (2025). Development and validation of civic engagement scale. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 1483. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-05837-1

Ramadhanti, D. N. (2021). The role of citizens education in improving students’ legal awareness. Social and Philosophical Foundation.

Vani, R.S.,  Zulyani, E. P., Saputra, D., & Ikhsan, M. (2024). The revolution of helix theory: Transforming public policy. Jurnal Administrasi Politik Dan Sosial, 5(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.46730/japs.v5i1.131

Ruiz-Casares, M., Collins, T. M., Tisdall, E. K. M., & Grover, S. (2017). Children’s rights to participation and protection in international development and humanitarian interventions: nurturing a dialogue. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1262520

Tantivess, S., & Walt, G. (2008). The role of state and non-state actors in the policy process: the contribution of policy networks to the scale-up of antiretroviral therapy in Thailand. Health Policy and Planning, 23(5), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czn023

Voets, J., Brandsen, T., Koliba, C., & Verschuere, B. (2021). Collaborative governance. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1419

Wang, H., & Ran, B. (2023). Network governance and collaborative governance: a thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements. Public Management Review, 25(6), 1187–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2011389

Zhu, N., Vornanen, R., Toikko, T., & Zhao, F. (2025). Research-policy-practice in developing a systems approach to child protection: a county-level case in China. Children and Youth Services Review, 177, 108462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2025.108462

Downloads

Published

2026-04-02

How to Cite

Suseno, B., Mustofa, M., Puspitasari, P., & Adnan, R. S. (2026). Community policy model in preventing pedophilia crimes in the community on an ongoing basis from the perspective of community citizenship policy . Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 23(1), 455–467. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v23i1.95958

Issue

Section

Systematic Literature Review (SLR) / Bibliometrics Article

Citation Check