Email this article 
Construct of anti-corruption character using exploratory factor analysis (EFA)
Edi Istiyono, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
Widihastuti -, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Agus Dwi Febrianto, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Abstract
Corruption is a very complicated problem in the current global era. One of the government's innovations in the battle against corruption is anti-corruption education. Along with the implementation of anti-corruption education, tools are needed to measure the success of implementing anti-corruption education programs through anti-corruption instruments. This study uses the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) method to demonstrate the construct validity of the anti-corruption character assessment tool. The anti-corruption value consists of nine values consisting of courage, justice, caring, simplicity and independence, hard work, responsibility, honesty, and discipline. This study uses the SPSS application in processing EFA construct validity data. The questionnaire has been tested on 72 junior high school students. The study's findings show that the character evaluation tool satisfies a number of EFA requirements: 1) The criteria for adequacy of the sample with a KMO-MSA value of > 0.5 (0.681) and sig. 0.000 on Bartlett's Test. 2) All items can be carried out by factor analysis because they have an anti-image correlation value > 0.5. 3) There are 8 factors formed from the eigenvalues of factor 1 (6,080), factor 2 (2,066), factor 3 (1,636), factor 4 (1,510), factor 6 (1,360), factor 7 (1,257), and factor 8 (1,085).
Keywords
References
Adjii, K. (2019). Instrumen Penilaian Kedisiplinan Siswa Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Assessment and Research on Education, 1(1), 1–10. https://ejournal.ressi.id/index.php/arisen
Avşar, A. Ş. (2022). Comparing the Automatic Item Selection Procedure and Exploratory Factor Analysis in Determining Factor Structure. Participatory Educational Research, 9(2), 416–436. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.47.9.2
Banjanovic, E., & Osborne, J. (2020). Exploratory Factor Analysis with SAS.
Bruce Thompson. (2004). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (understanding concepts and applications). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-010-0006-9
Caturiyati, K. H. dan. (2013). Validitas Konstruk (construct validity) dalam Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Non-Kognitif. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
Chan, L. L., & Idris, N. (2017). Validity and Reliability of The Instrument Using Exploratory Factor Analysis and Cronbach’™s alpha. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(10), 400–410. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i10/3387
Edi Istiyono. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian dan Analisis Hasil Belajar Fisika dengan Teori Tes Klasik dan Modern. UNY Press.
García-Santillán, A., Rojas-Kramer, C., Moreno-García, E., & Ramos-Hernández, J. (2017). Mathematics test, numerical task and mathematics course as determinants of anxiety toward math on college students. European Journal of Contemporary Education, 6(2), 240–253. https://doi.org/10.13187/ejced.2017.2.240
Garson, G. D. (2012). Testing statistical assumptions. Statistical Associates Publishing.
Handoyo, E. (2013). Pendidikan antikorupsi. In penerbit ombak. https://doi.org/10.24090/insania.v12i2.250
JR, J. F. H., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Person Prentice Hall.
Kemendikbud, & KPK. (2012). Panduan penyelenggaraan pendidikan antikorupsi di satuan pendidikan. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
KPK. (2016). Modul materi integritas untuk umum. In Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. Direktorat Pendidikan dan Pelayanan Masyarakat Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.
Kurniawan, M. W., & Lutfiana, R. F. (2021). Strategi Penanaman Nilai-Nilai Antikorupsi. Bhineka Tunggal Ika: Kajian Teori Dan Praktik Pendidikan PKn, 8(1), 32–39. https://doi.org/10.36706/jbti.v8i1.12336
Noviyanti, C. L., & Pardimin, P. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen pengukuran sikap disiplin peserta didik sekolah menengah pertama. Wiyata Dharma: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 7(2), 196–202.
Ozalp, U., & Cetin, M. (2022). Academic Intellectual Capital Scale: A Validity and Reliability Study. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 9(1), 138–164. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.946530
Pusat Edukasi Antikorupsi. (2022). Menegakkan pendidikan antikorupsi di Indonesia. Pusat Edukasi Antikorupsi. https://aclc.kpk.go.id/action-information/exploration/20220627-null
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian (panduan peneliti, mahasiswa, dan psikometrian) (1st ed.). Parama Publishing.
Retnowati, A. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian sikap tanggung jawab siswa SMP. Wiyata Dharma: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 7(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.30738/wd.v7i1.3591
Sarah, S., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Wilujeng, I. (2019). Development of living values (honesty) assessment instrument in learning process. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 443–458. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12429a
Sari, V. K., Akhwani, A., Hidayat, M. T., & Rahayu, D. W. (2021). Implementasi pendidikan karakter berbasis nilai-nilai antikorupsi melalui ekstrakurikuler dan pembiasaan di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(4), 2106–2115. https://jbasic.org/index.php/basicedu/article/view/1167
Siyoum, M., Teklesilasie, W., Nardos, R., Sirak, B., & Astatkie, A. (2023). Reliability and validity of the Sidaamu Afoo version of the pelvic organ prolapse symptom score questionnaire. BMC Women’s Health, 23(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-023-02478-x
Transparency International. (2022). Transparency international corruption perceptions index 2022. https://www.transparency.org/en/countries/indonesia
UCLA: Statistical Consulting Group. (2021). A practical introduction to factor analysis: exploratory factor analysis. UCLA: Statistical Consulting Group. https://stats.oarc.ucla.edu/spss/seminars/introduction-to-factor-analysis/a-practical-introduction-to-factor-analysis/
Verdian, E. (2019). Analisis faktor yang merupakan intensi perpindahan merek transportasi online di Surabaya. AGORA, 7(1).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v28i2.70730
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Find Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan on:
ISSN 2338-6061 (online) || ISSN 2685-7111 (print)
View Journal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Visitor Statistics