Evaluation of Teacher Professional Training (TPT) program in the position of full online learning

Ummu Salamah; Edi Istiyono

doi:10.21831/pep.v26i2.43978

Evaluation of Teacher Professional Training (TPT) program in the position of full online learning

Ummu Salamah, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Edi Istiyono, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/pep.v26i2.43978

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the Teacher Professional Training program (TPT) in first force Makassar State University (UNM) in a science study program in fully online learning. This research is an evaluation research with the CIPP model from Stufflebeam. The data were collected using a questionnaire-based survey method with descriptive statistical analysis. The instrument was distributed via google form to TPT students in positions. The conclusions of the research results are as follows: (1) The context aspect shows that the TPT program helps develop teacher professionalism (2) The input aspect shows that the Educational Personnel Education Institute organizers have good quality in implementing the TPT program (3) The process aspect shows that there is a relevance between the knowledge test material and the performance test on the educational competence and professionalism of teachers. (4) The product aspect shows that the TPT program affects changes in teacher teaching methods even though it is carried out entirely online.

Keywords

program evaluation; CIPP; Teacher Professional Training (TPT) in position

Full Text:

PDF

References

American Psychological Association. (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, and National Council on Measurement in Education.

Arifa, F. N., & Prayitno, U. S. (2019). Peningkatan kualitas pendidikan: Program Pendidikan Profesi Guru Prajabatan dalam pemenuhan kebutuhan guru profesional di Indonesia. Aspirasi: Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Sosial, 10(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.46807/aspirasi.v10i1.1229.

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. (2009). Evaluasi program pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Dalimunthe, M. B., Nugrahadi, E. W., Fitrawaty, & Dalimunthe, R. Z. (2019). Evaluation of Teacher Professional Training program with Contextual, Input, Process, and Product (CIPP) models. Global Conferences Series: Social Sciences, Education and Humanities (GCSSSEH), 3, 168-174. https://series.gci.or.id/article/213/13/icesshum-2019.

Firmansyah, J., Aswita, D., & Rizal, S. (2017). Analisis kompetensi mengajar guru sertifikat (profesional) sebagai dasar peningkatan kompetensi mengajar guru IPA pada SMP negeri di Kabupaten Aceh Besar. Jurnal Ilmiah DIDAKTIKA, 18(1), 32-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.22373/jid.v18i1.3083.

Government Regulation No. 19 of 2005 concerning National Education Standards. (2005).

Kartowagiran, B. (2011). Kinerja guru profesional (guru pasca sertifikasi). Cakrawala Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 3, 463-473. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v3i3.4208.

Kharzimi, M. (2015). Kesulitas siswa sekolah dasar dalam meningkatkan kemampuan literasi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 2(2), 11-21. http://jfkip.umuslim.ac.id/index.php/jupendas/article/view/233.

Kurniawan, M. W., & Zarnita, Y. (2020). Pembelajaran daring dalam pendidikan profesi guru: Dampak dan kendala yang dihadapi. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesi, 1(2), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.22219/jppg.v1i2.12440.

Law No. 20 of 2003 concerning the National Education System. (2003).

Law No. 14 of 2005 concerning Teachers and Lecturers. (2005).

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2020). Program Profesi Guru. In PPG Kemdikbud. Retrieved on November 3, 2020, from https://ppg.kemdikbud.go.id/.

Ministry of Research, Technology, and Higher Education. (2018). Pedoman penyelenggaraan program PPG tahun 2018. Direktorat Jenderal Pembelajaran dan Kemahasiswaan, Kementerian Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi.

Mizikaci, F. (2006). A systems approach to program evaluation model for quality in higher education. Assurance in Education, 14(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880610643601.

Murdiyanto, T. (2020). Persepsi peserta PPG dalam jabatan terhadap pelaksanaan program PPG hybrid learning bidang studi Matematika Universitas Negeri Jakarta tahun 2019. Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah, 4(1), 76-84. https://doi.org/10.21009/jrpms.041.11.

Mustofa, M., Chodzirin, M., Sayekti, L., & Fauzan, R. (2019). Formulasi model perkuliahan daring sebagai upaya menekan disparitas kualitas perguruan tinggi. Walisongo Journal of Information Technology, 1(2), 151-160. https://doi.org/10.21580/wjit.2019.1.2.4067.

Raharjo, S. B. (2012). Evaluasi trend kualitas pendidikan di Indoneisa. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(2), 511-532. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i2.1129.

Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture No. 87 of 2013 concerning the Professional Education Program for Preservice Teachers. (2013).

Regulation of the Minister of National Education No. 16 of 2007 concerning the Academic and Competence Qualification Standard of Teachers. (2007).

Riduwan, R. (2009). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Alfabeta.

Stufflebeam, D., & Shinkfield, A. (1985). Systematic evaluation: A self-instructional guide to theory and practice. Nijhoff.

Suryanto, S., & Djihad, D. (2012). Calon guru dan guru profesional. Multi Pressindo.

Suyanto, S. (2003). Reformasi kebijakan pendidikan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Usman, M. (2006). Menjadi guru profesional. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Wahyuni, W. (2018). Peningkatan kompetensi guru menuju era revolusi industri 4.0. Berkas DPR, 218.

Zulfitri, H., Setiawan, N. P., & Ismaini. (2019). Pendidikan Profesi Guru (PPG) sebagai upaya meningkatkan profesionalisme guru. Lingua, Jurnal Bahasa & Sastra, 19(2), 130-136. https://ejournal.unsri.ac.id/index.php/lingua/article/view/11095.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v26i2.43978