Evaluation of Bidikmisi scholarship program at state Islamic universities in Indonesia

Isra Misra, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangkaraya, Indonesia
Ali Sadikin, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangkaraya, Indonesia
Fadiah Adlina, Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangkaraya, Indonesia


This study raised the theme of evaluating the Bidikmisi scholarship program at State Islamic Universities in Indonesia with the CIPP Model approach. The Bidikmisi scholarship program is the government's flagship program for outstanding students who are less able to meet the costs of higher education. This research is evaluation research focusing on four areas: context, input, process, and product evaluation. The research subjects were one managing director, three universities within the Ministry of Religion of the Republic of Indonesia, and 15 student informants who received the Bidikmisi scholarship. The results of the research on the evaluation of the Bidikmisi scholarship program show that (1) the context of the program is carried out in accordance with the technical instructions issued by the directorate of Islamic higher education related to the evaluation of the Bidikmisi scholarship program. (2) Evaluation of inputs is carried out by meeting the criteria considering starting from setting evaluation goals to the results of program evaluation, and program targets are high school graduates who have academic and non-academic achievements. (3) In the current process, the Bidikmisi scholarship program has been running for ten years with satisfactory results, and the selection is made openly and transparently. (4) The product of this program evaluation is policy improvement and service improvement to prospective scholarship recipients. The program manager must maintain its performance by improving program quality, achievement process, and control. Programs should focus on increasing resources by strengthening program recipients' academic skills and knowledge.


evaluation; Bidikmisi scholarship; Cronbach-Stufflebeam

Full Text:



Agustina, N. Q., & Mukhtaruddin, F. (2019). The CIPP model-based evaluation on Integrated English Learning (IEL) program at language center. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 2(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v2i1.1043

Aksakal, E., Dağdeviren, M., Eraslan, E., & Yüksel, İ. (2013). Personel selection based on talent management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.02.021

Al-Shanawani, H. M. (2019). Evaluation of self-learning curriculum for kindergarten using Stufflebeam’s CIPP model. SAGE Open, 9(1), 215824401882238. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018822380

Aliyyah, R. R., Rosyidi, U., & Yazid, R. (2019). An evaluative study of an education scholarship program (Bidikmisi) for students in Indonesia. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175, 012171. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012171

Amygdalos, C., Bara, N., & Moisiadis, G. (2014). Performance appraisal in Greek public sector. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, 501–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.072

Arikunto, S. (2009). Evaluasi program pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Aziz, S., Mahmood, M., & Rehman, Z. (2018). Implementation of CIPP model for quality evaluation at school level: A case study. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i1.1553

Bowes, L., Moreton, R., Thomas, L., Sheen, J., Birkin, G., & Richards, S. (2016). Evaluation of the national scholarship programme: Year 4 report to HEFCE by CFE research and Edge Hill University. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/25232/1/2016_nspeval_y4.pdf

Csiernik, R., Chaulk, P., & McQuaid, S. (2012). A process evaluation of a Canadian public sector employee assistance program. Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 27(3), 160–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/15555240.2012.701169

Duncan, T. (2005). Principles of advertising & IMC. McGraw-Hill.

Gao, X., Shen, J., Wu, H., & Krenn, H. Y. (2019). Evaluating program effects: Conceptualizing and demonstrating a typology. Evaluation and Program Planning, 72, 88–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.10.008

Gorry, G. A. (2008). Sharing knowledge in the public sector: Two case studies. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 6(2), 105–111. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.kmrp.8500172

Hakan, K., & Seval, F. (2011). CIPP evaluation model scale: Development, reliability, and validity. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 592–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.146

Irawan, S., & Prasetyo, D. (2020). The evaluation of online school examination implementation using CIPP model. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 24(2), 136–145. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v24i2.33032

Mahfoozi, A., Salajegheh, S., Ghorbani, M., & Sheikhi, A. (2018). Developing a talent management model using government evidence from a large-sized city, Iran. Cogent Business & Management, 5(1), 1449290. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2018.1449290

Mahmudi, I. (2011). CIPP: Suatu model evaluasi program pendidikan. At-Ta’dib, 6(1), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.21111/at-tadib.v6i1.551

Ministry of Religion. (2013). Kementerian Agama telah menyalurkan beasiswa Bidikmisi. Diktis Kemenag. http://diktis.kemenag.go.id/v1/berita/kementerian-agama-telah-menyalurkan-beasiswa-bidik-misi

Misra, I., Ragil, M., & Fachreza, M. I. (2021). Manajemen perbankan syariah (Konsep dan praktik perbankan syariah di Indonesia) (S. Syarifudin (ed.)). K-Media.

Mulyatiningsih, E. (2014). Metode penelitian terapan bidang pendidikan. Alfabeta.

Pinnington, A., Alshamsi, A., Karatas-Ozkan, M., Nicolopoulou, K., Ozbilgin, M., Tatli, A., & Vassilopoulou, J. (2015). Early organizational diffusion of contemporary policies: Narratives of sustainability and talent management. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 213, 807–811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.480

Sadikin, A., Misra, I., & Hudin, M. S. (2020). Pengantar manajemen dan bisnis (S. Sardimi (ed.)). K-Media.

Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International handbook of educational evaluation (vol. 9, pp. 31–62). Springer.

Sugiyono, S. (2017). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Sukmadinata, N. S. (2009). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Thatcher, A., & Yeow, P. H. P. (2016). Human factors for a sustainable future. Applied Ergonomics, 57, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2016.05.007

Thomas, N. (2018). An analysis of program evaluation course content in CSHSE–accredited human services baccalaureate programs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.08.001

Tulung, J. M. (2014). Evaluasi program pendidikan dan pelatihan kepemimpinan tingkat IV di Balai Diklat Keagamaan Manado. Acta Diurna Komunikasi, 3(3), 1–16. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/actadiurnakomunikasi/article/view/5812

Unsal, O. (2019). Employee relations and firm risk: Evidence from court rooms. Research in International Business and Finance, 48, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2018.11.003

Webber, A., Rui, N., Garrison-Mogren, R., Olsen, R. B., Gutmann, B., & Bachman, M. (2019). Evaluation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program: Impacts three years after students applied. U.S. Department of Education and Institute of Education Sciences.

Wolf, P., Gutmann, B., Puma, M., Kisida, B., Rizzo, L., & Eissa, N. (2009). The evaluation of the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program: Impacts after three years. U. S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v26i1.45727


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Find Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan on:


ISSN 2338-6061 (online)    ||    ISSN 2685-7111 (print)

View Journal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Visitor Statistics