Fostering argumentation skills through project of STEM-Engineering Design process

Remanda Arya Wisutama; Nurul Fitriyah Sulaeman; Pramudya Dwi Aristya Putra

doi:10.21831/jk.v8i1.65673

Fostering argumentation skills through project of STEM-Engineering Design process

Remanda Arya Wisutama, Mulawarman University, Indonesia
Nurul Fitriyah Sulaeman, Mulawarman University, Indonesia
Pramudya Dwi Aristya Putra, University of Jember, Indonesia

10.21831/jk.v8i1.65673

Abstract

This study aims to explore students' ability to form argumentation patterns based on aspects of Toulmin's Argument Pattern (TAP) in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM)-based learning. Data collection was carried out through STEM-based worksheet which has 12 argumentation items that are in accordance with the Engineering Design Process (EDP) stages. The data was then analyzed qualitatively. This research was conducted at one of the junior high schools in Samarinda City in the even semester of the 2022/2023 academic year. The population in this study were all students of grade VII totaling 9 classes with a sample of grade VII-F consisting of 32 students. The results showed that the students' argumentation patterns consisted of several patterns, namely, Claim & Data (C-D); Claims, Data, & Warrants (C-D-W); Claims, Data, Warrants, & Backing (C-D-W-B); Claim, Data, Warrant, Backing, and Rebuttal (C-D-W-B-R) with the C-D pattern is the most common argumentation pattern. Students still need to be facilitated with learning that can guide students in forming more complex arguments so that an argumentation pattern is formed that includes warrant, backing, and rebuttal aspects.

Keywords

STEM learning; Argumentation Skill; Toulmin’s Argument Pattern; Climate Change

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abduh, N. K., & Sastromiharjo, A. (2019). Pola argumentasi pada genre teks eksposisi karangan siswa sma. RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 12(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v12i1.7372

Admoko, S., Suprapto, N., Suliyanah, Deta, U. A., Achmadi, H. R., Hariyono, E., & Madlazim. (2021). Using toulmin ’ s argument pattern approach to identify infodemics in the covid-19 pandemic era using toulmin ’ s argument pattern approach to identify infodemics in the covid-19 pandemic era. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1805(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1805/1/012011

Aviyanti, L. (2020). An investigation into indonesian pre-service physics teachers ’ scientific thinking and conceptual understanding of physics doctor of philosophy ( phd ).

Bozkurt, A., Ucar, H., Durak, G., & Idin, S. (2019). The current state of the art in STEM research: A systematic review study. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 14(3), 374–383. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v14i3.3447

Bravo-Torija, B., & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.-P. (2017). Developing an initial learning progression for the use of evidence in decision-making contexts. Int J of Sci and Math Educ, 16(4), 619–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9803-9

Castro, W. F., Durango-urrego, J. H., & Pino-fan, L. R. (2021). Preservice teachers ’ argumentation and some relationships to didactic-mathematical knowledge features. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(9), 1–20.

Faize, F. A., Husain, W., & Nisar, F. (2018). A critical review of scientific argumentation in science education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 475–483. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/80353

Fakhriyah, F., Rusilowati, A., Nugroho, S. E., Saptono, S., Ridlo, S., Mindyarto, B., & Susilaningsih, E. (2022). The scientific argumentative skill analysis reviewed from the science literacy aspect of pre-service teacher. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(4), 2129–2139. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i4.22847

Gülen, S., & Yaman, S. (2019). The effect of integration of stem disciplines into toulmin’s argumentation model on students’ academic achievement, reflective thinking, and psychomotor skills. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 16(2), 216–230. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10276a

Handayani, P., & Sardianto, M. S. (2015). Analisis argumentasi peserta didik kelas x sma muhammadiyah 1 palembang dengan menggunakan model argumentasi toulmin. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 2(1), 60–68.

Hasanah, F., Putra, P. D. A., & Rusdianto. (2022). Identifikasi kemampuan siswa smp dalam berargumentasi melalui pendekatan pembelajaran science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (stem). Jurnal Literasi Pendidikan Fisika (JLPF), 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.30872/jlpf.v3i1.974

Hasnunidah, N., Susilo, H., Irawati, M. H., & Suwono, H. (2022). Student conceptual and epistemic quality improvement argumenation with scaffolding on argument-driven inquiry. Jurnal Kependidikan Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 6(2), 189–199. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v6i2.48183

Hidayatullah, Z., Wilujeng, I., Nurhasanah, Gusemanto, T. G., & Makhrus, M. (2021). Synthesis of the 21 st century skills ( 4c ) based physics education research in indonesia. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 6(1), 88–97.

Indarwati, Syamsurijal, & Firdaus. (2021). Implementasi pendekatan stem pada mata pelajaran komputer dan jaringan dasar untuk meningktakan hasil belajar siswa smk negeri 2 baras mamuju utara. Jurnal MediaTIK, 4(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.26858/jmtik.v4i1.19725

Krajcik, J., & Delen, I. (2017). How to support learners in developing usable and lasting knowledge of stem. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.18404/ijemst.16863

Lobczowski, N. G., Allen, E. M., Firetto, C. M., Greene, J. A., & Murphy, P. K. (2020). An exploration of social regulation of learning during scientific argumentation discourse. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101925

Maulyda, M. A., Septiadi, D., Radha, R., Budiharjo, A., & Wulandari, N. P. (2021). Argumentation patterns of toulmin students during online lectures in the pandemic. Kajian Linguistik Dan Sastra, 6(1), 72–83. https://doi.org/10.23917/kls.v6i1.12018

Noviyanti, N. I., Mukti, W. R., Yuliskurniawati, I. D., Mahanal, S., & Zubaidah, S. (2019). Students’ scientific argumentation skills based on differences in academic ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1241(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1241/1/012034

Octaviyani, I., Kusumah, Y. S., & Hasanah. (2020). Peningkatan kemampuan berpikir kreatif matematis siswa melalui model project-based learning dengan pendekatan stem. Journal on Mathematics Education Research, 1(1), 10–14.

Paramita, A. K., Yahmin, & Dasna, I. W. (2020). Pembelajaran Inkuiri terbimbing dengan pendekatan stem ( science , technology , engineering , mathematics ) untuk pemahaman konsep dan keterampilan argumentasi siswa sma pada materi laju reaksi. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(1), 1652–1663.

Putra, P. D. A., Ahmad, N., Budiarso, A. S., Indrawati, & Lestari, E. A. (2023a). Development of argumentation tools based on the engineering design process to improve students ’ argumentation skills. The New Educational Review, 71(1), 114–125. https://doi.org/10.15804/tner.2023.71.1.09

Putra, P. D. A., Sulaeman, N. F., Lesmono, A. D., Kumano, Y., & Fadzil, H. B. M. (2023b). Gender roles in engineering design process activity: A small group exploration through collaborative argumentation. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 44, 251–256. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.34044/j.kjss.2023.44.1.28

Putra, P. D. A., Sulaeman, N. F., Supeno, & Wahyuni, S. (2021). Exploring students’ critical thinking skills using the engineering design process in a physics classroom. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 32, 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00640-3

Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan keterampilan abad ke-21 dalam pembelajaran kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1), 2239–2253.

Riwayani, R., Perdana, R., Sari, R., Jumadi, J., & Kuswanto, H. (2019). Analisis kemampuan argumentasi ilmiah siswa pada materi optik: Problem-based learning berbantuan edu-media simulation. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 5(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v5i1.22548

Roja, F. F. M., Yuliati, L., & Suyudi, A. (2020). Kemampuan argumentasi dan penguasaan konsep dinamika rotasi dengan pembelajaran inkuiri untuk pendidikan stem pada siswa kelas xi sman 2 malang. JRPF (Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika), 5(2), 129–133. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jrpf/

Santoso, A. M., & Arif, S. (2021). Efektivitas model inquiry dengan pendekatan stem education terhadap kemampuan berfikir kritis peserta didik. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 1(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.21154/jtii.v1i2.123

Suartha, I. N., Setiawan, I. G. A. N., & Sudiatmika, A. A. R. (2020). Pola argumentasi toulmin pada proses pembelajaran ipa smp. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 1–11.

Sulaeman, N. F., Putra, P. D. A., Mineta, I., Hakamada, H., Takahashi, M., Ide, Y., & Kumano, Y. (2021). Exploring student engagement in stem education through the engineering design process. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v7i1.10455

Suroto. (2021). Penerapan metode stem berbasis proyek untuk meningkatkan hasil dan keaktifan belajar mata pelajaran sistem kontrol terprogram. Jurnal Edukasi Elektro, 05(2), 120–130.

Syerliana, L., Muslim, & Setiawan, W. (2018). Argumentation skill profile using “toulmin argumentation pattern” analysis of high school student at subang on topic hydrostatic pressure. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012031

Ulum, M. B., Putra, P. D. A., & Nuraini, L. (2021). Identifikasi penggunaan edp (engineering design process) dalam berpikir engineer siswa sma melalui lembar kerja siswa (lks). Jurnal Riset Dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 8(2), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.12928/jrkpf.v8i2.20753

Utomo, Y. S., Ashadi, & Sarwanto. (2019). Argumentation skills profile on 8th grade students using toulmin’s argument pattern on controversial topic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012095

Wahyuni, N. P. (2021). Penerapan model pembelajaran berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar ipa. Journal of Education Action Research, 5(1), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v2i3.19293

Widhi, M. T. W., Hakim, A. R., Wulansari, N. I., Solahuddin, M. I., & Admoko, S. (2021). Analisis keterampilan argumentasi ilmiah peserta didik pada model pembelajaran berbasis toulmin’s argumentation pattern (tap) dalam memahami konsep fisika dengan metode library research. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 5(1), 79–91. https://doi.org/10.33369/pendipa.5.1.79-91

Widianawatia, S., & Sulisworo, D. (2020). Perancangan lembar kerja peserta didik berbasis stem pada materi elastisitas dan hukum hooke. Berkala Fisika Indonesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Fisika, Pembelajaran Dan Aplikasinya, 11(2), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.12928/bfi-jifpa.v11i2.20335

Widiyanti, I., Putra, P. D. A., & Anggraeni, F. K. A. (2021). Pengembangan ukbm dengan pendekatan engineering design process ( edp ) untuk meningkatkan literasi stem. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 10(3), 83–89.

Wind, S. A., Alemdar, M., Lingle, J. A., Moore, R., & Asilkalkan, A. (2019). Exploring student understanding of the engineering design process using distractor analysis. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0156-x

Zairina, S., & Hidayati, S. N. (2022). Analisis keterampilan argumentasi siswa smp berbantuan socio-scientific issue pemanasan global. Pensa E-Jurnal: Pendidikan Sains, 10(1), 37–43. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v8i1.65673