Post Publication Policy

Post-Publication Discussion and Correction  ·  Jurnal Penelitian Saintek
The conversation continues after publication.
How readers can comment on articles published in Jurnal Penelitian Saintek, and how the journal responds.
01
Policy
Jurnal Penelitian Saintek welcomes scholarly discussion of its published articles. Questions, criticism, and reports of errors help to keep the scholarly record accurate. The journal follows the COPE Core Practice on post-publication discussions and corrections.
02
Ways to take part
Comment to the editors Write to saintek@uny.ac.id with the title and DOI of the article, a clear description of the point, and the evidence.
Letter or commentary A short, argued response to an article. The editors may send it to the authors and to a reviewer. If it is accepted, it is published with a reply from the authors, if they wish to give one.
Report of an error or a concern Errors are handled under Correction, Retraction and Withdrawal. Suspected misconduct is handled under Research Misconduct.
03
Standards for comments
—  Be specific, courteous, and based on evidence. Criticise the work, not the authors.
—  Give your name and affiliation, and declare any competing interest. See Conflict of Interest.
—  Do not make unsupported claims of misconduct.
04
What the journal does
—  The editors read every comment and decide on the right action: a reply, a published comment, a correction, an expression of concern, an investigation, or no action.
—  The authors are given the chance to respond.
—  Corrections and retractions are published as notices linked to the article, and the article is never changed silently.
05
Duties of authors
Authors take part in good faith, share their data when asked and when possible, and correct their own errors promptly. See Research Data and Reproducibility.
06
Related
07
Sources
This policy is based on the guidance of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE):