Planning and design evaluation of pedestrian overpass (JPO) facilities in Pidie Regency arterial roads

Authors

  • Cut Nawalul Azka Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1896-2609
  • Rifki Hidayat Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh, Indonesia
  • Nazri Azlani Program Studi Teknik Sipil Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh, Indonesia
  • Deni Iqbal Teknologi Rekayasa Konstruksi Bangunan Gedung Politeknik Negeri Lhokseumawe, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/jps.v31i2.102576

Keywords:

Pedestrian Accessibility, Traffic Flow, Overpass JPO Planning, Level of Service (LOS)

Abstract

Transportation infrastructure on primary arterial roads supports mobility but often creates spatial conflicts with pedestrians at public activity hubs. This study examines the feasibility of planning non-level crossings along a main educational corridor on the Banda Aceh–Medan national highway in Pidie Regency. Current conditions indicate that inadequate crossing facilities in areas with high student activity have increased accident risk and reduced traffic flow efficiency. The research methodology involved surveying vehicle volume and pedestrian density over a full week, with technical analysis based on the PV2 parameter in accordance with the latest guidelines from the Directorate General of Highways. The study found a peak traffic volume of 3,127 vehicles per hour and a pedestrian intensity of 50 people per hour. The PV2 calculation yielded 488,906,450, which significantly exceeded the technical threshold of 2×10⁸. Based on these results, constructing a pedestrian overpass or JPO was deemed highly feasible as a planning solution to separate conflicting traffic flows, ensure student safety, and improve arterial road efficiency in Pidie Regency. This recommendation is expected to minimize traffic conflicts and support public safety and accessibility in Pidie

References

Azka, C. N., Syammaun, T., Amin, J., & Fadlika, M. A. (2024). Analisis kinerja fasilitas penyeberangan jalan Kota Banda Aceh terhadap indikator keselamatan dan efisiensi. Konferensi Nasional Teknik Sipil (KoNTekS), 1(4). https://doi.org/10.62603/konteks.v1i4.70

Chandrappa, A. K., Bhattacharyya, K., & Maitra, B. (2021). Measures for improving pedestrian crossing facilities based on perceptions of urban commuters: An experience in Kolkata. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 9(2), 965–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2021.04.017

Cirianni, F. M. M., Comi, A., & Luongo, A. S. (2022). A sustainable approach for planning of urban pedestrian routes and footpaths in a pandemic scenario. TeMA – Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 15(1), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.6093/1970-9870/8629

Direktorat Jenderal Bina Marga. (2014). Pedoman kapasitas jalan Indonesia (PKJI). Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum.

Gerike, R., Koszowski, C., Schröter, B., Buehler, R., Schepers, P., Weber, J., Wittwer, R., & Jones, P. (2021). Built environment determinants of pedestrian activities and their consideration in urban street design. Sustainability, 13(16), Article 9362. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169362

Hadijah, I., & Setiawan, R. (2025). Perencanaan kebutuhan fasilitas pejalan kaki pada area Pasar Kalirejo Lampung Tengah. TAPAK (Teknologi Aplikasi Konstruksi): Jurnal Program Studi Teknik Sipil, 14(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.24127/tp.v14i2.4188

Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. (2018). Pedoman perencanaan teknis fasilitas pejalan kaki (Surat Edaran Menteri PUPR Nomor 02/SE/M/2018).

Landis, B. W., Vattikuti, V. R., Ottenberg, R. M., McLeod, D. S., & Guttenplan, M. (2001). Modeling the roadside walking environment: Pedestrian level of service. Transportation Research Record, 1773(1), 82–88. https://doi.org/10.3141/1773-10

Mashuri, M., & Ikbal, M. (2011). Studi karakteristik pejalan kaki dan pemilihan jenis fasilitas penyeberangan pejalan kaki di Kota Palu (Studi kasus: Jl. Emmi Saelan depan Mal Tatura Kota Palu). Jurnal Rekayasa dan Manajemen Transportasi, 1(2), 69–79.

Meviana, A. D., Faradhiba, T., & Latifa, E. A. (2023). Analisis fasilitas penyeberangan pada ruas jalan arteri. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Sipil, 4(2), 141–149.

Nugroho, A., & Tanan, N. (2020). Perencanaan fasilitas penyeberangan bagi pejalan kaki berdasarkan kebutuhan di Jalan Raden Patah Jakarta Selatan. Jurnal HPJI (Himpunan Pengembangan Jalan Indonesia), 6(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.26593/jh.v6i2.4053.93-104

Panggalo, H. F. S. L., Saudi, A. I., & Sainuddin. (2025). Analisis aksebilitas trotoar terhadap peningkatan pejalan kaki di Alun-Alun Kota Polewali Mandar. Jurnal Teknik Sipil, 1(1), 42–47. https://doi.org/10.31605/jutsi.v1i1.5081

Ramadhan, R. W., Widodo, S., & Basalim, S. (2022). Kajian penggunaan pelican crossing bagi penyeberang jalan (Studi kasus Jalan Gajah Mada Pontianak Kalimantan Barat). JeLAST: Jurnal Teknik Kelautan, PWK, Sipil, dan Tambang, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.26418/jelast.v9i4.60281

Ristiyanto, H. G., & Supranoto, B. (2024). Dampak pandemi COVID-19 terhadap karakteristik fungsi hambatan perjalanan menuju kawasan pendidikan. Jurnal Ilmiah Teknosains, 10(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.26877/jitek.v10i1/Mei.18917

Roess, R. P., Prassas, E. S., & McShane, W. R. (2011). Traffic engineering (4th ed.). Pearson.

Transportation Research Board. (2016). Highway capacity manual: A guide for multimodal mobility analysis (6th ed.).

World Health Organization. (2013). Pedestrian safety: A road safety manual for decision-makers and practitioners. North Central Texas Council of Governments

Downloads

Published

2026-10-01

How to Cite

Azka, C. N., Hidayat, R., Azlani, N., & Iqbal, D. (2026). Planning and design evaluation of pedestrian overpass (JPO) facilities in Pidie Regency arterial roads. Jurnal Penelitian Saintek, 31(2), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.21831/jps.v31i2.102576

Issue

Section

Articles

Citation Check

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.