Analyzing public sentiment on implementing the presidential threshold in Indonesia's presidential election system
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v20i1.57295Keywords:
presidential election presidential threshold, sentiment analysisAbstract
The threshold Limits for presidential and vice presidential candidates have been a prominent topic since the introduction of direct presidential elections. Initially, the presidential threshold aimed to determine the candidates competing in the presidential election. However, over time, it has become a subject of prolonged debate, as it was perceived to undermine the rights of individuals in government and impede the principle of equality in democracy. This study utilizes qualitative research methods to gauge public sentiment regarding implementing the presidential threshold in Indonesia's presidential election system after the 2019 election. The research collected data through the Nvivo 12 Plus, utilizing sources such as Twitter (with the hashtag #presidentialthreshold) and online news media outlets, including Kompas, Detik, Tempo, Republika, and TribunNews. The study findings indicate that the percentage requirement is the most frequently discussed topic regarding the presidential threshold. Tempo is the online news media outlet that prominently highlights the issue. The analysis reveals that negative sentiment prevails in public opinion, comprising 63% of responses, while positive sentiment constitutes 37%. Tempo primarily represents positive sentiment, while Republika reflects negative sentiment. Positive public sentiment focuses on parliamentary support, while negative sentiment centers around candidates' opportunities.
References
Anggara, V. (2019). Dinamika presidential threshold di Indonesia. Jurnal Transformative, 5(2), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.transformative.2019.005.02.2
Ansari, A. N., Syamsu, S., & Ekawaty, D. (2022). Relevansi Parliamentary Threshold dan Sistem Kepartaian di Indonesia. Palita: Journal of Social Religion Research, 7(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.24256/pal.v7i1.2851
Armia, M. S., Nafrizal, Fitriadi, M. D., & Maulana, I. (2016). Penghapusan presidential threshold sebagai upaya pemulihan hak-hak konstitutional. PETITA: JURNAL KAJIAN ILMU HUKUM DAN SYARIAH, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.22373/petita.v1i2.83
Brandão, C. (2015). P. Bazeley and K. Jackson, qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). Qualitative Research in Psychology, 12(4), 492–494. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.992750
Diniyanto, A. (2018). Measuring the impact of implementing the presidential threshold in the 2019 concurrent elections. Indonesian State Law Review (ISLRev), 1(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.15294/islrev.v1i1.26941
Fuqoha, F. (2018). Pengisian jabatan presiden dan presidential threshold dalam demokrasi konstitusional di Indonesia. Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v1i2.495
Ghoffar, A. (2018). Problematika presidential threshold: Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dan pengalaman di negara lain. Jurnal Konstitusi, 15(3), 480–501. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1532
Hasti, I., Nurmandi, A., Muallidin, I., Kurniawan, D., & Salahudin. (2022). Pros and cons of vaccine program in Indonesia (Social media analysis on Twitter). In T. Ahram & R. Taiar (Eds.), Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Systems V (pp. 100–107). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85540-6_13
Maftuh, M. A. (2020). Parliamentary threshold in constitutional election in 2019 (Philosophical review of the principles of people sovereignty). JIL : Journal of Indonesian Law, 1(2), 200–213. https://doi.org/10.18326/jil.v1i2.200-213
Mausili, D. R. (2019). Presidential threshold anomaly in Indonesian government system: parlementer reduction in Indonesian presidential system. Bappenas Working Papers, 2(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.47266/bwp.v2i1.28
Mukhtarrija, M., Handayani, I. G. A. K. R., & Riwanto, A. (2017). Inefektifitas pengaturan presidential threshold dalam undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 24(4), 644–662. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol24.iss4.art7
Nurhadi, A. (2012). Implementasi algoritma naive bayes classifier berbasis particle swarm optimization (PSO) untuk klasifikasi konten berita digital bahasa Indonesia. Sari, 2(3), 48–56. https://ijns.org/journal/index.php/speed/article/view/1081
Nurhuda, F., Widya Sihwi, S., & Doewes, A. (2016). Analisis sentimen masyarakat terhadap calon presiden Indonesia 2014 berdasarkan opini dari Twitter menggunakan metode Naive Bayes Classifier. Jurnal Teknologi & Informasi ITSmart, 2(2), 35–42. https://doi.org/10.20961/its.v2i2.630
Pratama, E. E., & Atmi, R. L. (2020). A text mining implementation based on Twitter data to analyse information regarding Corona Virus in Indonesia. Journal of Computers for Society, 1(1), 91–100. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/JCS/article/view/25502
Prawira, A. (2020). Pilpres dua pasang lagi, cebong dan kampret kembali muncul. https://nasional.sindonews.com/read/66406/12/pilpres-dua-pasang-lagi-cebong-dan-kampret-kembali-muncul-1591866363
Septia, E., & Suswanta, S. (2022). The volunteers phenomenon of presidential election in Indonesia. Journal of Governance, 7(2), 452–460. https://doi.org/10.31506/jog.v7i2.14820
Syahuri, T., & Fahrozi, M. H. (2020). Konstitusionalitas Pasal 222 UU Nomor 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilu (presidential treshold). Al Wasath Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 1(1), 25–34. http://repository.umsu.ac.id/handle/123456789/11224
Wahyuni, A. C. (2018). Bingkai berita WNI (Warga Negara Indonesia) dalam kasus pembunuhan Kim Jong-Nam (Analisis Framing pada portal Berita BBC Indonesia (bbc. com/indonesia) dan Utusan Malaysia (utusan. com. my) Periode Februari-Oktober 2017) [Undergradute Thesis, Universitas Indonesia]. https://dspace.uii.ac.id/handle/123456789/12753
Widyana, M. R. (2022). Strategi Partai Gelora sebagai Partai baru menuju Pemilu 2024 untuk Memenuhi Parliamentary Threshold. Jurnal PolGov, 4(1), 125–168. https://doi.org/10.22146/polgov.v4i1.3861
Wijaya, A., Rosmini, & Poppilea Erwinta. (2020). Problematika hukum penerapan presidential threshold dalam pemilihan umum di Indonesia. Risalah Hukum, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.30872/risalah.v16i1.316
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors agree to transfer the transfer copyright of the article to The Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan effective if and when the paper is accepted for publication.
Authors and other parties are bound to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License for the published articles, legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA).
