The process and role of the judiciary in election administration dispute resolution in Indonesia

Eny Kusadarini, Program Studi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Anang Priyanto, Program Studi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Sri Hartini, Program Studi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia


Election administrative violations occur at the time of the implementation of the general election by election organizers and contestants. Sometimes, they do not realize that they have committed a violation. Since the general election during the reformation period after the fall of the New Order in Indonesia, there have been frequent violations of election administration resolved through administrative courts through the State Administrative Court. The dispute resolution was carried out after complaints were made through Bawaslu and DKPP as administrative dispute resolution (ADR) institutions and did not bring results.  This administrative violation is considered detrimental to the candidate contesting the election, causing a dispute between the candidate contesting the election and the organizers of the general election. This article examines the process of resolving electoral administrative disputes in Indonesia and the judiciary's role in resolving electoral administrative disputes. Several examples of cases of election administration violations that occurred and their causes obtained through empirical studies using the technique of documenting judges' decisions that have permanent legal force at the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia were analyzed using inductive logic.


case settlement; general election administration; justice court proceeding

Full Text:



Amarini, I., & Hidayah, A. N. (2019). Judicial activism resolving administrative disputes in Indonesia. 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW), 358, 322–326.

Amsler, L. B. (2010). The next generation of administrative law: building the legal infrastructure for collaborative governance. In next generation of administrative law: building the legal infrastructure for collaborative governance (No. 2010-07–04; School of Public and Environmental Affairs Research Paper Series, Vol. 2010).

Butt, S., Crouch, M., & Dixon, R. (2016). Special issue: The first decade of indonesia’s constitutional court. Australian Journal of Asian Law, 16(2), 113-12-.

Cahill-Ripley, A. (2014). Foregrounding socio-economic rights in transitional justice: Realising justice for violations of economic and social rights. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 32(2), 183–213.

Eilo Wing-Yat Yu. (2011). Electoral fraud and governance: The 2009 legislative direct election in Macao. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 10(1), 90–128.

Hegre, H., & Nygård, H. M. (2015). Governance and conflict relapse. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59(6), 984–1016.

Kelliher, C., Isra, S., Daulay, Z., Tegnan, H., & Amsari, F. (2019). Unconstitutional authority of Indonesia’s constitutional court: The resolution of Pilkada result disputes. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 18(3), 297–308.

Liddle, R. W., & Mujani, S. (2007). Leadership, party, and religion: explaining voting behavior in Indonesia. Comparative Political Studies, 40(7), 832–857.

Lupu, N., & Riedl, R. B. (2012). Political parties and uncertainty in developing democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 46(11), 1339–1365.

Malatesta, D., Amsler, L. B., & Foxworthy, S. (2017). Disputant preferences for mediated or adjudicated processes in administrative agencies: the occupational safety and health review commission settlement part program (1315 E. 10th St.; School of Public and Environemental Affairs).

McCafferty, S. (2009). Social justice and public policy: Seeking fairness in diverse societies. Health & Social Care in the Community, 18(1), 110–111.

Mirbahar, H. N. (2019). Flawed laws, flawed elections: local elections in Pakistan. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 18(1), 1–15.

Norris, P., Frank, R. W., & Coma, F. M. i. (2013). Assessing the quality of elections. Journal of Democracy, 24(4), 124–135.

Pal, M. (2017). Canadian election administration on trial: ‘Robocalls’, opitz and disputed elections in the courts. King’s Law Journal, 28(2), 324–342.

Pamungkas, C. (2017). Noken electoral system in Papua deliberative democracy in Papuan tradition. Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya, 19(2), 219–236.

Peerenboom, R., & He, X. (2008). Dispute Resolution in China: Patterns, Causes and Prognosis. In La Trobe Law School Legal Studies Research (No. 9).

Slater, D., & Simmons, E. (2013). Coping by colluding: Political uncertainty and promiscuous powersharing in Indonesia and Bolivia. Comparative Political Studies, 46(11), 1366–1393.

Ufen, A. (2008a). From aliran to dealignment: Political parties in post-Suharto Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 16(1), 5–41.

Ufen, A. (2008b). Political party and party system institutionalization in Southeast Asia: lessons for democratic consolidation in Indonesia, the Philippines and Thailand. The Pacific Review, 21(3), 327–350.

Ufen, A. (2010). Electoral campaigning in indonesia: The professionalization and commercialization after 1998. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 29(4), 11–37.

Wise, C. R. (2001). Election administration in crisis: an early look at lessons from Bush versus Gore. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 131–139.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Our journal indexed by:


Supported by:

RJI Main logo


Jurnal Civics Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan is published Univesitas Negeri Yogyakarta in collaboration with Indonesia Association Profession of Pancasila and Civic Education/Asosiasi Profesi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan (AP3KnI).

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Civics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


j.civics stat