Developing and implementing an instrument for assessing critical thinking and visual representations in learning Physics materials of Optical Instruments

Dewi Nurulhasni; Eka Ayu Nurbaiti; Rosa Safirotun Nabila; Jumadi Jumadi

doi:10.21831/pep.v27i1.53550

Developing and implementing an instrument for assessing critical thinking and visual representations in learning Physics materials of Optical Instruments

Dewi Nurulhasni, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Eka Ayu Nurbaiti, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Rosa Safirotun Nabila, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Jumadi Jumadi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/pep.v27i1.53550

Abstract

This study aims to develop an assessment instrument to measure students' critical thinking and visual representation abilities in optical instrument material. This research and development (R&D) employed the ADDIE (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation) instructional model. This research develops a test instrument that has more specific stages so the ADDIE development stage is integrated with the development stage of the test instrument developed by Mardapi. The subjects in this study are grade XI students of State Madrasah Aliyah (MAN) 4 Bantul. This study produced a test instrument for measuring students' critical thinking and visual representation abilities, with high validity,and analyzed using Aiken's V. The items for assessing critical thinking and visual representation abilities were analyzed using the QUEST program with the following findings. (1) The analysis results of instrument validation using Aiken's V obtained an average Aiken's Value above 0.4 with high validity and moderate validity criteria so all items are valid. (2) The pre-test analysis on item estimates obtained MNSQ Infit in the range 0.77-1.30 and the value of outfit t ≤ 2 and in the MNSQ Infit case estimates in the range 0.77-1.30, so overall, the items matched to Rasch models. (3) Post-test analysis on item estimates obtained MNSQ Infit in the range 0.77-1.30 and outfit t value ≤ 2 and in case estimates MNSQ Infit in the range 0.77-1.30 so, overall, items are in accordance with Rasch models. (4) The reliability of the pre-test items is 0.92 while the reliability of the post-test items is 0.76. (5) The difficulty level of the items in the pre-test results shows that Question 10 is the most difficult while number 3 is the easiest, and in the post-test results, Question 8 is the most difficult while Question 6 is the easiest.

Keywords

assessment instrument; critical thinking; visual representation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ackerman, G. L. (2010). Brief review of Fadel, C., & Trilling, B. (2009) 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. Jossey-Bass.

Adams, R. J., & Kho, S.-T. (1996). Acer Quest version 2.1. The Australian Council for Educational Research.

Ainiyah, Q., Yuliati, L., & Parno, P. (2020). Analisis penguasaan konsep dan kesulitan belajar materi Alat-Alat Optik pada siswa kelas XI MAN Tuban. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Fisika, 5(1), 24–29. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jrpf/article/view/15904

Asmawati, E. Y. S., Rosidin, U., & Abdurrahman, A. (2018). Efektivitas instrumen asesmen model creative problem solving pada pembelajaran Fisika terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis siswa. JPF (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika) FKIP UM Metro, 6(2), 128-143. https://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/fisika/article/view/1318

Butler, P. J., Dong, C., Snyder, A. J., Jones, A. D., & Sheets, E. D. (2008). Bioengineering and Bioinformatics Summer Institutes: Meeting modern challenges in undergraduate summer research. CBE Life Sci Educ., 7(1), 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.07-08-0064

Disman, D., Kurniawati, S., & Sukamto, R. A. (2020). Peningkatan berpikir kritis melalui metode pembelajaran berbasis masalah dengan animasi analisis grafis. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Indonesia, 2(1), 59-66. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/JPEI/article/view/28345

Frijters, S., ten Dam, G., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2006). Effects of dialogic learning on value loaded critical thinking. Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 66−82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.11.001

Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Kluwer Inc.

Hendryadi, H. (2014). Content validity (Validitas isi). Teorionline Personal Paper, 01, 1–5. https://teorionline.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/010614-content-validity.pdf

Hikmat, H., & Efendi, R. (2011). Representasi momentum dan impuls melalui diagram. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerapan MIPA, pp. 207-211. Retrieved on June 13, 2022, from http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FPMIPA/JUR._PEND._FISIKA/AHMAD_SAMSUDIN/Publikasi/26PFis_Hikmat.pdf

Luthvitasari, N., Made D. P., N., & Linuwih, S. (2012). Implementasi pembelajaran Fisika berbasis proyek terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis, berpikir kreatif, dan kemahiran generik sains. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 1(2), 92-97. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise/article/view/630

Makhrus, M., Ayub, S.,Wahyudi, W., Verawati, N. N. S. P., & Busyairi, A. (2020). Kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa pada materi Optik saat proses pembelajaran dengan CCM-CCA berbantuan eksperimen virtual. Kappa Journal Program Studi Pendidikan Fisika, 4(2), 143-148. https://doi.org/10.29408/kpj.v4i2.2632

Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran penilaian & evaluasi pendidikan. Nuha Medika.

Mukti, T. S., & Istiyono, E. (2018). Instrumen penilaian kemampuan berpikir kritis peserta didik SMA negeri mata pelajaran Biologi kelas X. BIOEDUKASI: Jurrnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(2), 105–110. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/bioedukasi/article/view/21624

Murniati, N., Febyasha, R., & Irwandi, I. (2020). Kemampuan berpikir kritis dan hasil belajar kognitif siswa menggunakan model Pembelajaraan Kooperatif tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) di MAN 2 Kota Bengkulu. Diklabio: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Biologi, 4(1), 94-105. https://doi.org/10.33369/diklabio.4.1.94-105

Nur’asiah, R. R. F., Siahaan, P., & Samsudin, A. (2015). Deskripsi instrumen tes keterampilan berpikir kritis materi Alat Optik. In Simposium Nasional dan Pembelajaran Sains 2015 (SNIPS 2015), pp. 497–500. https://ifory.id/proceedings/2015/z4pZjcJkq/snips_2015_rd._risma_farissa_nurasiah_63ad41e19ce5254d4ee1531011f52977.pdf

Pradana, S. D. S., Parno, P., & Handayanto, S. K. (2017). Pengembangan tes kemampuan berpikir kritis pada materi Optik Geometri untuk mahasiswa Fisika. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v21i1.13139

Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture No. 23 of 2016 concerning the Standard for Educational Assessment. (2016).

Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis kuantitatif instrumen penelitian. Parama Publishing.

Rosengrant, D., Etkina, E., & Van Heuvelen, A. (2007). An overview of recent research on multiple representations. AIP Conference Proceedings, 883(1), 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2508714

Sankey, M. (2005). Multimodal design and the neomillenial learner. In Proceedings of OLT 2005 Conference, Brisbane, Australia, 27 September 2005, pp. 251-259. https://research.usq.edu.au/item/9x99z/multimodal-design-and-the-neomillenial-learner

Sari, D. K. (2020). Analisis instrumen penilaian kemampuan pemodelan matematis pada kelas Fisika menggunakan Rasch model. MEGA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(1), 46–52. https://doi.org/10.59098/mega.v1i1.182

Subali, B., & Suyata, P. (2012). Pengembangan item tes konvergen dan divergen dan penyelidikan validitasnya secara empiris. Diandra Pustaka Indonesia.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v27i1.53550