Augmented reality: Interactive and fun learning media to improve student learning outcomes

Siti Anisyah; Mohammed Mahmoud Mohammed Imlessh; Selvy Kusumaningrum; Nanik Sri Haryati; Jarot Tri Bowo Santoso

doi:10.21831/jk.v8i2.70167

Augmented reality: Interactive and fun learning media to improve student learning outcomes

Siti Anisyah, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia, Indonesia
Mohammed Mahmoud Mohammed Imlessh, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Selvy Kusumaningrum, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Nanik Sri Haryati, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia
Jarot Tri Bowo Santoso, Universitas Negeri Semarang, Indonesia

10.21831/jk.v8i2.70167

Abstract

Technological developments constantly bring various conveniences to all users, especially in the field of education. In education, technology plays a crucial role in developing innovative, creative, and informative learning methods. This research aims to analyze the role of Augmented Reality (AR) as an interactive and engaging learning medium to enhance student learning outcomes. This research involves experimental studies conducted on 52 accounting education students from the class of 2023 at Semarang State University. Data were collected using tests, questionnaires, and interviews. The data were analyzed using descriptive percentages and t-tests. The results of this research show that (1) AR media can be an effective and enjoyable interactive learning media. (2) Augmented Reality (AR) media has been shown to enhance student learning outcomes, with the average score increasing from 21.08 in the pretest to 70.60. This represents a significant improvement of 49.52 points. In addition, the results of the TAM analysis indicate that AR media is recommended for application in the learning process.

Keywords

Education

References

AH. Sanaky, H. 2013. Media Pembelajaran Interaktif-Inovatif. Yogyakarta: Kaukaban Dipantara

Alfian, A. N., & Tjahjadi, D. (2019). Technology Acceptance Model pada Sistem Pembelajaran E-Learning. Information Management For Educators And Professionals: Journal of Information Management, 4(1), 63–72.

Arsyad , Azhar. 2013. Media Pembelajaran Edisi Revisi, Jakarta: PT. Rajangrafiondo Persada

Azuma, R. Baillot, Y.Behringer, R., Feiner, S., Julier, S., & Maclntyre, B. (2001). Recent advance in augmented reality. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 21(6), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.1109/38.963459

Bacca-Acosta J, Baldiris S, Fabregat R, Graf S, Kinshuk D. Augmented reality trends in education: a systematic review of research and applications. Edutechnol Soc 2014;17:133-49

Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., & Lee, G. (2015). A survey or augmented reality. Foundation and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction,8(2-3), 73-272. https://doi.org/10.1561//1100000049

Budiman, M. R. (2022). Inovasi pendidikan dan urgensinya dalam menghadapi pendidikan di era teknologi informasi. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/ gxws9

Chiu, L.-C., Tsai, F.-C., Hu, H.-C., Chang, C.-H., Hung, C.-Y., Lee, C.-S., Li, S.H., Lin, S.-W., Li, L.-F., Huang, C.-C., Chen, N.-H., Yang, C.-T., Chen, Y.-C., Kao, K.-C., 2015. Survival Predictors in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 99, 243–250. j.athoracsur.2014.07.064Nincarean, D., Alia, M.,

Halim, N., & Rahman,. M. (2013). Mobile Augmented Relity : The Potencial for Education. Journal of social and behavioral sciences, 657-664. https://doi.org/10.1016/

Daryanes, F., & Ririen, D. (2020). Efektivitas penggunaan aplikasi kahoot sebagai alat evaluasi pada mahasiswa. Journal of Natural Science and Integration, 3(2), 172–186. https://doi.org/10.24014/jnsi.v3i2.9283.

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Diptha, K. A. S. (2017). Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Kepuasan Karyawan Dalam Menggunakan Uang Elektronik Kartu Flazz Bca Di Lingkungan Anantara Seminyak Resort-Bali. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Undiksha, 9(1), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpe.v9i1.20002

Integrating motion-capture Augmented Reality technology as an interactive program for children. International conference on universal acces in human computer interacton, 103-111.

Josef Buchner, Michae Kerres. (2023). Media comparison studies dominate comparative research on augmented reality in education. Computer and Education ScienceDirect. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104711

Jundullah, M., Umar, R., & Yudhana, A. (2019). Analisis Penerimaan Sistem ELearning Smk Negeri 4 Kota Sorong Dengan Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Seminar Nasional Teknologi, 1(2), 724.

Karinaningsih. (2010). Studi Komparasi Pembelajaran TIK dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Numbered Heads Together Structure (NHTS) dan Model Pembelajaran AIR untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA. Skripsi Pendidikan Ilmu Komputer UPI. Bandung: Tidak Diterbitkan.

Krisnawijaya, N.K., & Dewi, I. G. A. A. P. (2019). Evaluasi penerapan Undiknas Mobile: Analisis Technology Aceptance Model. SINTECH (Science and Information Technology) Journal, 2920, 71-80. https;//doi.org/10.31598/sintechjournal.v2i2.319

Lee, S. S., & Wella, W. (2018). Analisis technology acceptance model penggunaan e-learning pada mahasiswa. Ultima InfoSys: Jurnal Ilmu Sistem Informasi, 9(2), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.31937/si.v9i2.913

Maharani, M. R., & Usman, O. (2021). The effect of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use on The Use of E-learning with TAM Model in Faculty of Economics Student of Jakarta State University. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, Perkantoran, Dan Akuntansi-JPEPA, 2(3), 427–438.

Mamonto, N., Umar, F. A. R., & Kadir, H. (2021). Penggunaan Media Kahoot dalam Penilaian Pembelajaran Mengevaluasi Struktur dan Kebahasaan Teks Anekdot pada Siswa Kelas X SMK Negeri 1 Suwawa Jambura. Journal of Linguistics and Literature, 2(1)

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Sage.

Nurzanah, I., & Sosianika, A. (2019). Promosi Penjualan dan Minat Beli: Penerapan Modifikasi Technology Acceptance Model di E-Marketplace Shopee Indonesia. Prosiding Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar, 10(1), 706–714.

Nustini, Y., & Adhinagari, A. H. (2020). Penerapan Technology Acceptance Model Pada Penggunaan E-Money Studi Pada Wilayah Non Perkotaan. Nominal: Barometer Riset Akuntansi Dan Manajemen, 9(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/10.21831/nominal.v9i2.30471

Pasanda, E., & Kusumawati, A. (2020). Technology Accepted Model Pada Penggunaan Teknologi Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Akuntansi. Paulus Journal of Accounting (PJA), 2(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.34207/pja. v2i1.89

Permatasari, C. L., & Prajanti, S. D. W. (2018). Acceptance of financial accounting information system at schools: Technology acceptance model. Journal of Economic Education, 7(2), 109–120.

Rahman, M. H. (2020). Review of digital record management needs for academic libraries. Library Hi Tech News, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1108/LHTN-11- 2019-0083

Raza, S. A., Umer, A., & Shah, N. (2017). New determinants of ease of use and perceived usefulness for mobile banking adoption. International Journal of Electronic Customer Relationship Management, 11(1), 44–65. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJECRM.2017.086751

Saltan F, Arslan. The use of augmented reality in formal education: a scoping review. EURASIA J Math, Sci Technol Edue 2017;13. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00628a

Samar, S., Ghani, M., & Alnaser, F. (2017). Predicting customer’s intentions to use internet banking: the role of technology acceptance model (TAM) in ebanking. Management Science Letters, 7(11), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.msl.2017.8.004

Santoso, J. T. B. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran Akuntansi. Khantil.

Shadish, Cook and Campbell. 2002. Experimental and Quasi Experimental Design

for Generalized Causal Inference. USA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

Sulaiman. 2012. Pengembangan sistem evaluasi. Yogyakarta : Insan Madani.

Sulistyaningsih, I., & Nugraha, J. (2022). The Analisis Penerimaan Pengguna Platform Pembelajaran Virtual Learning Unesa (Vinesa) Menggunakan Task Technology Fit (TTF) Dan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), 10(1). https://doi.org/10.26740/jpap. v10n1.p107-123

Sumardi, D. H., & Andreani, F. (2021). Pengaruh perceived usefulness dan perceived ease of use terhadap usage behavior melalui intention to use pada konsumen online shop sayurbox di Surabaya. Agora, 9(1).

Surendran, P. (2012). Technology acceptance model: A survey of literature. International Journal of Business and Social Research, 2(4), 175–178.

Tjokrosaputro, M., & Cokki, C. (2020). The Role of Social Influence Towards Purchase Intention With Value Perception as Mediator: A Study on Starbucks Coffee as an Environmentally Friendly Product. 8th International Conference of Entrepreneurship and Business Management Untar (ICEBM 2019), 183–189. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.200626.034

Tyas, E. I., & Darma, E. S. (2017). Pengaruh Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Enjoyment, dan Actual Usage Terhadap Penerimaan Teknologi Informasi: Studi Empiris Pada Karyawan Bagian Akuntansi dan Keuangan Baitul Maal Wa Tamwil Wilayah Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Reviu Akuntansi Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 1(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.18196/rab.010103

Widaningsih, S., & Mustikasari, A. (2022). Pengaruh perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use dan perceived enjoyment terhadap penerimaan teknologi informasi web SMB Universitas Telkom. Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 4(12), 5717–5725. https://doi.org/10.32670/fairvalue.v4i12.2020

Wulandari, W., Japarianto, E., & Tandijaya, T. N. B. (2022). Penerapan technology acceptance model (tam) terhadap perilaku konsumen mobile banking di SURABAYA. Jurnal Manajemen Pemasaran, 16(2), 126–132. https://doi.org/10.9744/pemasaran.16.2.126-132.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v8i2.70167