Development of integrative thematic environment-based learning materials

Tiok Wijanarko

doi:10.21831/jk.v8i2.45269

Development of integrative thematic environment-based learning materials

Tiok Wijanarko, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/jk.v8i2.45269

Abstract

This study aimed to develop integrative thematic learning materials based on the surrounding environment and evaluate their effectiveness in improving students' environmental awareness and learning autonomy. Utilizing the Borg & Gall development model, the research followed a systematic process including interviews, observations, and surveys. Validation by curriculum and subject matter experts rated the developed materials as highly suitable. The materials were implemented and assessed through limited and operational trials with elementary school students. Findings indicated significant improvements in both environmental awareness and learning autonomy, supported by paired sample t-test results showing a significance level of 0.000. Key components of the developed materials included contextually relevant syllabi, lesson plans, instructional content, and student worksheets that integrated the surrounding environment as a learning medium. These materials facilitated experiential learning, encouraging direct interaction with real-world environmental challenges. This approach not only fostered positive attitudes toward environmental care but also promoted independent learning, enhancing students’ ability to manage and evaluate their own learning processes.

Keywords: thematic learning, environmental integration, environmental awareness, learning autonomy, instructional materials development

References

Amri, S. (2015). Implementasi Pembelajaran Aktif dalam kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Prestasi Pustakarya.

Azka, R., & Santoso, R. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran kalkulus untuk mencapai ketuntasan dan kemandirian belajar siswa. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 78 - 91.

Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and researching autonomy. New York: Routledge.

Bilton, H. (2010). Outdoor learning in the early years: management and

Cooper, B. (2004). Empathy, Interaction and Caring: Teachers' Roles in a Constrained Environment. Pastoral Care In Education, 22(3), 12-21. doi:10.1111/j.0264-3944.2004.00299.x

Cooper, G. (2012). Outdoor learning, environment and sustainability. Environmental Education, 10028-31.

Douglass, C., & Morris, S, R. (2014). Student perspectives on self-directed learning. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(1), 13-25. doi: 10.14434/josotl.v14i1.3202

Ernst, J., & Tornabene, L. (2012). Preservice early childhood educators’ perceptions of outdoor settings as learning environments. Environmental Education Research, 18(5), 643-664.

Erviana, V. (2016). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran berbasis sosiokultural bagi siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 4(2), 222-232.

Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: personal, polotical, and global. New York: Oxford University Press.

Holm, D. (2012). Exploring environmental empathy in action with children's books. Reading Improvement, 49(4), 134-139.

Johnson. E. B (2014). CTL: Contextual Teaching & Learning menjadikan kegiatan belajar mengajar mengasyikkan dan bermakna. (Terjemahan Ibnu Setiawan). California: Corwin Press. (Buku asli diterbitkan tahun 2002)

Majid, A. & Rochman, C. (2014). Pendekatan ilmiah dalam implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Mukminan, Nursa’ban, M., & Suparmini. (2013). Assessing Students’ Learning Autonomy According to Seven Jumps Technique in Higher Education. American Journal of Educational Research, 1(7), 263–266. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-1-7-8

Purwandari, S., & Suardiman, S. (2013). Pengaruh penerapan students team achievement divisions untuk mengembangkan sikap ramah lingkungan di sd sendangadi 1. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 1(1), 103-112. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v1i1.2332

Reinders, H., & Balcikanli, C. (2011). Learning to foster autonomy: The role of teacher education materials Studies in Self-Access Learning Journal, 2 (1), 15-25.

Siswoyo, D. Et al. (2008). Ilmu pendidikan. Yogyakarta: UNY Press

Swarat, S. (2008). What makes a topic interesting? A conceptual and methodological exploration of the underlying dimensions of topic interest. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(2).

Tivani, I., & Paidi, P. (2016). Pengembangan LKS biologi berbasis masalah untuk meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah dan karakter peduli lingkungan. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(1), 35-45. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i1.8804

Warger, T. (2009). Learning environments. Where space, technology, and culture converge. Educause Learning Initiative Paper, 1.

Waridah, W., & Aman, A. (2015). Pengembangan perangkat pembelajaran tematik-integratif tema menghargai jasa pahlawan berbasis sosiokultural di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 3(2), 213 - 226.

Wirth, S., & Rosenow, N. (2012). Supporting Whole-Child Learning in Nature-Filled Outdoor Classrooms. YC: Young Children, 67(1), 42-48

Winch, C. (2006). Graduate attributes and changing conceptions of learn-ing. Dalam Hager, P. & Holland, S., Graduate attributes, learning and employability, (pp. 67-90). Dordrecht: Springer.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v8i2.45269