Critical writing patterns and learning strategies among vocational college students: Evidence from thesis writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v15i2.76100Keywords:
academic literacy, critical thinking, critical writing, thesis writing, vocational educationAbstract
Developing critical writing skills remains a persistent challenge for vocational college students whose learning environments emphasize practical and technical competencies over academic discourse. Research specifically examining how vocational students demonstrate critical thinking in thesis writing is still limited. This study investigates (1) the patterns of critical writing that emerge in students’ thesis reports and (2) students’ perceptions of the strategies they use when engaging in critical writing. A qualitative design combining content analysis and thematic analysis was applied. Data were collected from 22 final thesis reports from 12 study programs and reflective statements and interviews with 10 Diploma-4 students. The analytical framework was adapted from Paul and Elder’s substantive writing skills. The findings show that vocational students demonstrate strengths in explanation and basic analysis; however, more advanced cognitive skills—such as synthesis, evaluation, and argument construction—remain weak. Students rarely develop counterarguments, critically examine opposing views, or integrate sources into coherent reasoning. Thematic analysis further reveals that students perceive critical writing as fulfilling structure and format rather than as a process of reasoning, evaluation, and synthesis. Difficulties are concentrated in topic delimitation, literature review, paraphrasing, and maintaining academic integrity, while supervisor feedback becomes the primary driver of writing progress. Overall, the study highlights a gap between students’ high motivation and their limited epistemic awareness of academic argumentation. These results emphasize the need for explicit instruction, structured scaffolding, and feedback focused on argument development rather than formatting. The study contributes to the literature by offering detailed insights into how critical writing develops within vocational higher education contexts and by proposing practical directions for instructional improvement.
References
Al-Mahrooqi, R., & Denman, C. J. (2020). Assessing students' critical thinking skills in the humanities and sciences colleges of a middle eastern university. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 783–796. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13150a
Alkema, E., Weijen, D. Van, & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2023). Synthesis writing in science orientation classes: An instructional design study. Journal of Writing Research, 15(1), 133–165. https://doi.org/10.17239/JOWR-2023.15.01.06
Ariyanti, A., & Fitriana, R. (2017). EFL Students' difficulties and needs in essay writing. Proceedings of the International Conference on Teacher Training and Education 2017 (ICTTE 2017), 32–42. https://doi.org/10.2991/ictte-17.2017.4
Baker, K. M. (2016). Peer review as a strategy for improving students' writing process. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787416654794
Basori, M. A. (2016). Prinsip kutipan dan parafrasa : Kekokohan pilar-pilar paragraf. 1–17.
Buyuktas Kara, M., Van Steendam, E., Rijlaarsdam, G., & Kuru, H. (2018). The Effect of Two Modes of Instruction: Modeling vs. Presentational. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(2), 460–495.
í‡avdar, G., & Doe, S. (2012). Learning through writing: Teaching critical thinking skills in writing assignments. PS - Political Science and Politics, 45(2), 298–306. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096511002137
í‡elik, S. (2020). Building critical academic writing skills: The impact of instructor feedback on Turkish ELT graduate students. Tesl-Ej, 24(3).
Choy, S. Cp. S. O. (2012). Reflective thinking and teaching practices: A precursor for incorporating critical thinking into the classroom. International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 167–182.
Ciampa, K., & Wolfe, Z. (2019). Preparing for dissertation writing: doctoral education students' perceptions. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 10(2), 86–108. https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-03-2019-0039
Coffin, C., Hewings, A., & North, S. (2012). Arguing as an academic purpose: The role of asynchronous conferencing in supporting argumentative dialogue in school and university. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEAP.2011.11.005
Cí–MERT, M., & KUTLU, í–. (2018). The effect of self-assessment on achievement in writing in english. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 8(1), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.22521/jesr.2018.81.4
Connecting ideas in writing. (n.d.). Retrieved June 26, 2023, from https://students.unimelb.edu.au/academic-skills/resources/developing-an-academic-writing-style/connecting-ideas-in-writing
Creswell, J. W. (2016). Planning, Conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. In Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar (6th ed., Vol. 6, Issue August). Pearson Education, Inc.
Cumming, A., Lai, C., & Cho, H. (2016). Students' writing from sources for academic purposes: A synthesis of recent research. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 23, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.06.002
Davis, M. (2013). The development of source use by international postgraduate students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2012.11.008
Dewa, I., Made Budhyani, A., & Angendari, D. (2021). Kesulitan dalam menulis karya ilmiah. Mimbar Ilmu, 26(3), 400–407. https://doi.org/10.23887/MI.V26I3.40678
Didiharyono, D., & Qur'ani, B. (2019). Increasing community knowledge through the literacy movement. To Maega | Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 2(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.35914/tomaega.v2i1.235
Din, M. (2020). Evaluating university students' critical thinking ability as reflected in their critical reading skill: A study at bachelor level in Pakistan. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100627. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100627
Emilia, E. (2010). Students' critical thinking in writing a thesis using the transitivity system. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Negeri Malang, 17(2), 108416.
Escorcia, D., Passerault, J. M., Ros, C., & Pylouster, J. (2017). Profiling writers: analysis of writing dynamics among college students. Metacognition and Learning, 12(2), 233–273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-016-9166-6
Felipe, L., Contreras, M., Nussbaum, M., Paredes, R., Gelerstein, D., Alvares, D., & Chiuminatto, P. (2023). Developing critical thinking in technical and vocational education and training. Education Sciences, 13(6). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13060590
Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821125
Heriyudananta, M. (2021). Analisis kompetensi menulis karya tulis ilmiah mahasiswa di Indonesia. Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture, and Social Studies, 1(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.53754/iscs.v1i1.5
Hossain, M. I. (2015). Teaching Productive skills to the students: a secondary level scenario. A Thesis, 1–90. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/74352632.pdf
Huber, M. M., Leach-López, M. A., Lee, E., & Mafi, S. L. (2020). Improving accounting student writing skills using writing circles. Journal of Accounting Education, 53, 100694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2020.100694
Huisman, B., Saab, N., van Driel, J., & van den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: undergraduate students' peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318
Hyland, K. (2013). Writing in the university: Education, knowledge and reputation. Language Teaching, 46(1), 53–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000036
Hyytinen, H., Lí¶fstrí¶m, E., & Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2016). Challenges in argumentation and paraphrasing among beginning students in educational sciences. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1147072, 61(4), 411–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1147072
Imaniah, I. (2022). a Critical review of english essay writing in studies of critical thinking, reading habits, and sentence structure mastery. IEFLJ) Indonesian EFL Journal, 8(1), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v8i1.5588
Inch, E. S., Warnick, B., & Endres, D. (2006). Critical thinking and communication fifth edition: the use of reason in argument. 363. https://books.google.com/books/about/Critical_Thinking_and_Communication.html?id=neQITwEACAAJ
Jabri, U., & Ismail, I. (2021). Dampak peer review dan lecturer corrective feedback pada kinerja penulisan artikel ilmiah mahasiswa. Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(2), 579–592. https://doi.org/10.33487/edumaspul.v5i2.2182
Johns, A. M., & Mayes, P. (1990). An analysis of summary protocols of university ESL students. Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/11.3.253
Keck, C. (2014). Copying, paraphrasing, and academic writing development: A re-examination of L1 and L2 summarization practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 25(1), 4–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.05.005
Kelly, G. J., & Takao, A. (2002). Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing. Science Education, 86(3), 314–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/SCE.10024
Kuswandari, A. H. (2018). Kontribusi kemampuan berpikir kritis sebagai konstruksi peningkatan keterampilan menulis esai. Gramatika STKIP PGRI Sumatera Barat, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2018.v4i1.2410
Kuyyogsuy, S. (2019). Promoting peer feedback in developing students' english writing ability in L2 writing class. International Education Studies, 12(9), 76. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v12n9p76
Lam, Y. W., Hew, K. F., & Chiu, K. F. (2018). Improving argumentative writing: Effects of a blended learning approach and gamification. Language Learning and Technology, 22(1), 97–118. https://dx.doi.org/10125/44583
Lee, M. K. (2015). Peer feedback in second language writing: Investigating junior secondary students' perspectives on inter-feedback and intra-feedback. System, 55, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.08.003
Leití£o, S. (2003). Evaluating and selecting counterarguments. Written Communication, 20(3), 269–306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088303257507
Lestari, D., Haryani, S., & Sumarti, S. S. (2020). Analysis of critical thinking skills in vocational high school automotive engineering students. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 9(1), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.15294/JISE.V8I3.32379
Lestari, F. A., & Wijayanti, P. H. (2021). Mengapa menulis skripsi itu sulit. Proceeding Pendidikan, 5(1), 200. http://jerman.sastra.um.ac.id/selasar/index.php/prosiding-2021/
Liao, M., & Tseng, C. (2010). Students' behaviors and views of paraphrasing and inappropriate textual borrowing in an EFL academic setting. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 187–211.
Linderholm, T., Therriault, D. J., & Kwon, H. (2014). Multiple science text processing: Building comprehension skills for college student readers. Reading Psychology, 35(4), 332–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2012.726696
Liu, F., Du, J., Zhou, D. Q., & Huang, B. (2021). Exploiting the potential of peer feedback: The combined use of face-to-face feedback and e-feedback in doctoral writing groups. Assessing Writing, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100482
Liu, F., & Stapleton, P. (2014). Counterargumentation and the cultivation of critical thinking in argumentative writing: Investigating washback from a high-stakes test. System, 45(1), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.05.005
Loh, Y. L. (2013). Errors in paraphrasing and strategies in overcoming them. Journal of Creative Practices in Language Learning and Teaching (CPLT), 1(1), 4–17.
Martínez, I., Mateos, M., Martín, E., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2015). Learning history by composing synthesis texts: Effects of an instructional programme on learning, reading and writing processes, and text quality. Journal of Writing Research, 7(2), 275–302. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.07.02.03
Mateos, M., Martín, E., Cuevas, I., Villalón, R., Martínez, I., & González-Lamas, J. (2018). Improving written argumentative synthesis by teaching the integration of conflicting information from multiple sources. Cognition and Instruction, 36(2), 119–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/07370008.2018.1425300
Mateos, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., Martín, E., Cuevas, I., Van den Bergh, H., & Solari, M. (2020). Learning paths in synthesis writing: Which learning path contributes most to which learning outcome? Instructional Science, 48(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09508-3
Mateos, M., & Solé, I. (2009). Synthesising information from various texts: A study of procedures and products at different educational levels. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24(4), 435–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03178760
McMillan, L. R., & Raines, K. (2011). Using the "write" resources: Nursing student evaluation of an interdisciplinary collaboration using a professional writing assignment. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(12), 697–702. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20110930-01
Michael Nussbaum, E. (2008). Collaborative discourse, argumentation, and learning: Preface and literature review. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(3), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.06.001
Mostert, L. A., & Townsend, R. (2018). Embedding the teaching of academic writing into anthropology lectures. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 55(1), 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1231619
Na, C. Do, & Nhat Chi Mai, N. X. (2017). Paraphrasing in Academic Writing: a case study of vietnamese learners of english. Language Education in Asia, 8(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.5746/LEIA/17/V8/I1/A02/NA_MAI
Nisa, K., Syafitri, E., Saragih, S. R. D., Aryni, Y., & Rahmadani, E. (2022). Penggunaan Aplikasi parafrasa untuk menurunkan plagiarisme pada mahasiswa FKIP Universitas Asahan dalam Menyelesaikan Skripsi. Jurnal Warta Pengabdian Andalas, 29(1), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.25077/jwa.29.1.55-60.2022
Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., Bayat, A., van Ginkel, S., Biemans, H. J. A., & Mulder, M. (2020). Students' online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: does gender matter? In Interactive Learning Environments (Vol. 28, Issue 6, pp. 698–712). https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1543200
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Nurcaya, N. (2021). Berpikir kritis dalam skripsi mahasiswa. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 7(1), 106–111. https://doi.org/10.30605/onoma.v7i1.572
Nussbaum, E. M., & Kardash, C. M. (2005). The effects of goal instructions and text on the generation of counterarguments during writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 157–169. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.157
O'Brien, S. P., Marken, D., & Petrey, K. B. (2016). Student perceptions of scholarly writing. The Open Journal of Occupational Therapy, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.15453/2168-6408.1253
Pashler, H., Mcdaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2009). Learning Styles Concepts and Evidence. www.learningstyles.net
Pu, S., & Evans, M. (2019). Critical thinking in the context of Chinese postgraduate students' thesis writing: a positioning theory perspective. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 32(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/07908318.2018.1442473
Rowley, J. (2012). Conducting research interviews. Management Research Review, 35(3–4), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211210154/FULL/PDF
S, S., I, I., & M, M. (2021). Kemampuan menulis karya ilmiah mahasiswa calon guru sekolah dasar melalui penerapan metode drill. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 7(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v7i1.2301
Safitri, I. N., Lestari, P. Y., & Kartikasari, P. B. (2022). Students ' perception on the use of ' writing 3 ' materials to prepare final project. 11(2), 336–345. https://doi.org/10.31571/bahasa.v11i2.4529
Safriyani, R., Laras, A. M., Nur, H. M., & Wichda, E. F. (2020). Critical thinking in english academic essay: Indonesian teacher's voices. 139–142. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200427.028
SANTI, L. S. (2021). Students ' perception of the writing community in terms of improving their ( A Study at English Study Program of IAIN Curup ). State Islamic Institute Of Curup.
Segev-Miller, R. (2007). Cognitive processes in discourse synthesis: The case of intertextual processing strategies. In G. Rijlaarsdam, M. Torrance, L. Waes, & D. Galbraith (Eds.), Studies in Writing (Vol. 20, pp. 231–250). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1572-6304(2007)0000020016
Shi, L., Fazel, I., & Kowkabi, N. (2018). Paraphrasing to transform knowledge in advanced graduate student writing. English for Specific Purposes, 51, 31–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.03.001
Siregar, S. P. E., Sari, F., Sudjoko, S., & Yundayani, A. (2022). Dealing with english writing skills: Through the eyes of vocational students. Eureka: Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.56773/ejer.v1i1.3
Solé, I., Miras, M., Castells, N., Espino, S., & Minguela, M. (2013). Integrating information: An analysis of the processes involved and the products generated in a written synthesis task. Written Communication, 30(1), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312466532
Stapleton, P., & Wu, Y. (Amy). (2015). Assessing the quality of arguments in students' persuasive writing: A case study analyzing the relationship between surface structure and substance. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 17, 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEAP.2014.11.006
Suhartoyo, E. (2017). The importance of critical thinking competence: An investigation of students' writing experiences. International Seminar on Language, Education, and Culture, October, 34–42.
Sun, Y. C. (2013). Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detection software to uncover matching text across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12(4), 264–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEAP.2013.07.002
Sun, Y. C., & Yang, F. Y. (2015). Uncovering published authors' text-borrowing practices: Paraphrasing strategies, sources, and self-plagiarism. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 20, 224–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JEAP.2015.05.003
Susetyo, S., & Noermanzah, N. (2020). Kemampuan dan kesulitan mahasiswa program studi pendidikan bahasa indonesia Universitas Bengkulu dalam Menulis Proposal Penelitian Skripsi. Silampari Bisa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Daerah, Dan Asing, 3(2), 182–201. https://doi.org/10.31540/silamparibisa.v3i2.1071
Sutherland, A., & Incera, S. (2021). Critical reading: What do faculty think students should do? Journal of College Reading and Learning, 51(4), 267–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2021.1887777
Vandermeulen, N., Steendam, E. Van, De Maeyer, S., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2022). Writing Process feedback based on keystroke logging and comparison with exemplars: Effects on the quality and process of synthesis texts. 40(1), 90–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883221127998
Vinet, L., & Zhedanov, A. (2011). A "missing" family of classical orthogonal polynomials. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical, 44(8), 178–186. https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201
Wahyuni, S. E., & Inayati, N. (2020). The problems of generating ideas faced by english language students in research proposal writing. PIONEER: Journal of Language and Literature, 12(2), 88. https://doi.org/10.36841/pioneer.v12i2.633
Wan Mohd Yunus, W. N. M. (2020). Written corrective feedback in English compositions: Teachers' practices and students' expectations. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(2), 95. https://doi.org/10.12928/eltej.v3i2.2255
Widarsih, S., & Suherdi, D. (2019). Analisis umpan balik tertulis guru pada tulisan siswa dalam teks recount. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 19(3), 434–444. https://doi.org/10.17509/jpp.v19i3.22336
Widiowati, T., Faqihuddin Putera, Z., & Shofiah, N. (2023). Penerapan metode inkuiri dalam pemilihan topik tulisan akademik. PRASI, 18(01), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.23887/PRASI.V18I01.60389
Widodo, A., Kadir Jaelani, A., Novitasari, S., Sutisna, D., & Erfan, Mu. (2020). Anlisis Kemampuan menulis makalah mahasiswa Baru PGSD Universitas Mataram. Jurnal Didika: Wahana Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 6(1), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.29408/didika.v6i1.1946
Widowati, T., Faqihuddin Putera, Z., Shofiah, N., & Putri Ramadhani, R. (2023). Kemampuan mengolah bahan Bacaan pada Penyusunan Proposal Skripsi Mahasiswa. Konstruktivisme : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 15(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.35457/KONSTRUK.V15I1.2612
Wolfe, C. R. (2012). Individual Differences in the "Myside Bias" in reasoning and written argumentation. Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.1177/0741088312457909, 29(4), 477–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088312457909
Wolfe, C. R., & Britt, M. A. (2008). The locus of the myside bias in written argumentation. Thinking and Reasoning, 14(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780701527674
Wolfe, C. R., Britt, M. A., & Butler, J. A. (2009). Argumentation schema and the myside bias in written argumentation. Written Communication, 26(2), 183–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088309333019
Yahia, I. A. (2020). How university-level English language learners learn to paraphrase [Washington State University]. https://hdl.handle.net/2376/107801
Yamin, M., & Purwati, O. (2020). Enhancing critical writing towards undergraduate students in conducting research Proposal. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3649250
Zuriati, D. (2017). Kesulitan menulis proposal oleh mahasiswa STIBA Persada Bunda Pekanbaru. Menara Ilmu, IX(74), 7–18. https://doi.org/10.33559/MI.V11I74.71
지난ì˜. (2012). Modes of paraphrasing attempted by Korean L2 Writers. English Teaching, 67(4), 131–178. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.67.4.201212.131
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors submitting a manuscript to this journal agree that, if accepted for publication, copyright publishing of the submission shall be assigned to Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi. However, even though the journal asks for a copyright transfer, the authors retain (or are granted back) significant scholarly rights.
The copyright transfer agreement form can be downloaded here: [JPV Copyright Transfer Agreement Form]
The copyright form should be signed originally and sent to the Editorial Office through email to jpvokasi@uny.ac.id
Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpv is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
