Analysis of improving innovative work behaviour of vocational high school teachers in terms of servant leadership with knowledge sharing as an intervening variable

Hendro Prasetyono, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia
Sumaryati Tjitrosumarto, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia
J. Sabas Setyohadi, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia
Sri Hapsari, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia
Ira Pratiwi Ramdayana, Universitas Indraprasta PGRI, Indonesia


The purpose of this research is to describe the innovative work behavior of vocational high school teachers in terms of servant leadership which is intervened by knowledge sharing. This research uses a quantitative approach with a survey method. The sampling technique was simple random sampling which came from vocational high school teachers from the provinces of East Java, Central Java, West Java, DKI Jakarta, Banten, Riau Islands, and South Sumatra with a total of 165 teachers. Data analysis techniques using descriptive analysis and path analysis. Results: The dimension of the teacher's innovative work behavior, namely with the intent of benefit to the organization has the highest score and the idea promotion dimension has the lowest score. Servant leadership has a positive and significant influence on knowledge sharing with a contribution of 42.3%. knowledge sharing has a positive and significant influence on innovative work behavior with a contribution of 58.4%. Knowledge sharing cannot be an intervening variable of servant leadership on innovative work behavior because the path analysis results show that servant leadership does not directly affect innovative work behavior through knowledge sharing. The implication is that city or district education offices must further enhance the idea promotion exploration of teachers through training or workshops and maintain that with the intent of benefit to the organization of teachers through servant leadership style and knowledge sharing of teachers and school principals.


Exploration of idea promotion; path analysis; quantitative approach; survey method; vocational schools

Full Text:



Akram, T., Lei, S., Haider, M. J., & Hussain, S. T. (2020). The impact of organizational justice on employee innovative work behavior: Mediating role of knowledge sharing. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(2), 117–129.

Asurakkody, T. A., & Kim, S. H. (2020). Effects of knowledge sharing behavior on innovative work behavior among nursing Students: Mediating role of Self-leadership. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences, 12, 100190.

Blašková, M., Blaško, R., Jankalová, M., & Jankal, R. (2014). Key personality competences of university teacher: Comparison of requirements defined by teachers and/versus defined by students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 466–475.

Burden, K., Kearney, M., Schuck, S., & Hall, T. (2019). Investigating the use of innovative mobile pedagogies for school-aged students: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 138, 83–100.

Colakoglu, S., Chung, Y., & Ceylan, C. (2022). Collaboration-based HR systems and innovative work behaviors: The role of information exchange and HR system strength. European Management Journal, 40(4), 518–531.

Coun, M. J. H., Peters, P., & Blomme, R. J. (2019). ‘Let’s share!’ The mediating role of employees’ self-determination in the relationship between transformational and shared leadership and perceived knowledge sharing among peers. European Management Journal, 37(4), 481–491.

Craig, C. J., Zou, Y., & Curtis, G. (2018). The developing knowledge and identity of an Asian-American teacher: The influence of a China study abroad experience. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 17, 1–20.

Cummings, J. N. (2004). Work groups, structural diversity, and knowledge sharing in a global organization. Management Science, 50(3), 352–364.

Dahiya, R., & Raghuvanshi, J. (2022). Validation of innovative work behaviour scale: Indian apparel manufacturing sector. Asia Pacific Management Review, 27(2), 120–136.

De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010). Measuring innovative work behaviour. Creativity and Innovation Management, 19(1), 23–36.

Dincer, H., Gencer, G., Orhan, N., & Sahinbas, K. (2011). The significance of emotional intelligence on the innovative work behavior of managers as strategic decision-makers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 909–919.

Elrehail, H. (2018). The relationship among leadership, innovation and knowledge sharing: A guidance for analysis. Data in Brief, 19, 128–133.

Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 111–132.

Fraser, S., Beswick, K., & Crowley, S. (2019). Making tacit knowledge visible: Uncovering the knowledge of science and mathematics teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 86, 102907.

Greasley, P. E., & Bocârnea, M. C. (2014). The relationship between personality type and the servant leadership characteristic of empowerment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 124, 11–19.

Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495–513.

Harris, L. (2011). Secondary teachers’ conceptions of student engagement: Engagement in learning or in schooling? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 376–386.

Hou, H.-T., Sung, Y.-T., & Chang, K.-E. (2009). Exploring the behavioral patterns of an online knowledge-sharing discussion activity among teachers with problem-solving strategy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 101–108.

Howell, J. B., & Saye, J. W. (2016). Using lesson study to develop a shared professional teaching knowledge culture among 4th grade social studies teachers. The Journal of Social Studies Research, 40(1), 25–37.

Kakhki, M. K., Hadadian, A., Joyame, E. N., & Asl, N. M. (2020). Understanding librarians’ knowledge sharing behavior: The role of organizational climate, motivational drives and leadership empowerment. Library & Information Science Research, 42(1), 100998.

Kırkgöz, Y. (2008). A case study of teachers’ implementation of curriculum innovation in English language teaching in Turkish primary education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1859–1875.

Korzilius, H., Bücker, J. J. L. E., & Beerlage, S. (2017). Multiculturalism and innovative work behavior: The mediating role of cultural intelligence. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 56, 13–24.

Kuril, S., Maun, D., & Chand, V. S. (2023). Measuring teacher innovative behavior: A validated multidimensional inventory for use with public school teachers. International Journal of Educational Management, 37(2), 393–416.

Kwon, K., & Kim, T. (2020). An integrative literature review of employee engagement and innovative behavior: Revisiting the JD-R model. Human Resource Management Review, 30(2), 100704.

Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161–177.

Lin, F., Lin, S., & Huang, T. (2008). Knowledge sharing and creation in a teachers’ professional virtual community. Computers & Education, 50(3), 742–756.

Mâţă, L., & Suciu, A. I. (2011). Curricular innovative model focused on developing pedagogical competences of teachers of language and communication. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 274–282.

Mphahlele, L. K., & Rampa, S. H. (2014). Cluster system: An innovative network for teacher development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 3131–3134.

Nasongkhla, J., & Sujiva, S. (2015). Teacher competency development: Teaching with tablet technology through Classroom Innovative Action Research (CIAR) coaching process. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 992–999.

Nguyen, D., Pietsch, M., & Gümüş, S. (2021). Collective teacher innovativeness in 48 countries: Effects of teacher autonomy, collaborative culture, and professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106, 103463.

Örnek, A. Ş., & Ayas, S. (2015). The relationship between intellectual capital, innovative work behavior and business performance reflection. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1387–1395.

Pastore, S., & Andrade, H. L. (2019). Teacher assessment literacy: A three-dimensional model. Teaching and Teacher Education, 84, 128–138.

Prasetyono, H., Abdillah, A., & Fitria, D. (2018). Academic supervision toward teacher’s performance through motivation as intervening variable. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 12(2), 188–197.

Prasetyono, H., Abdillah, A., Widiarto, T., & Sriyono, H. (2018). Improving student’s affective competencies (minimizing hoax) through the implementation of character-based economic learning and teacher’s reinforcement. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(3), 426–435.

PytlikZillig, L. M., Horn, C. A., Bruning, R., Bell, S., Liu, X., Siwatu, K. O., Bodvarsson, M. C., Kim, D., & Carlson, D. (2011). Face-to-face versus computer-mediated discussion of teaching cases: Impacts on preservice teachers’ engagement, critical analyses, and self-efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 302–312.

Rachmawati, A. W., & Lantu, D. C. (2014). Servant leadership theory development & measurement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 115, 387–393.

Ramdayana, I. P., & Prasetyono, H. (2022). Innovative work behavior guru sekolah menengah kejuruan. JUPEIS : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Sosial, 1(1), 60–69.

Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., van der Heijden, B. I. J. M., & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67–77.

Spanuth, T., & Wald, A. (2017). How to unleash the innovative work behavior of project staff? The role of affective and performance-based factors. International Journal of Project Management, 35(7), 1302–1311.

Sriratanaviriyakul, N., & El-Den, J. (2017). Motivational factors for knowledge sharing using pedagogical discussion cases: students, educators, and environmental factors. Procedia Computer Science, 124, 287–299.

Sriratanaviriyakul, N., & El-Den, J. (2019). Pedagogical discussion cases in higher education: The role of knowledge sharing in students’ learning. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 215–225.

Subramaniam, K. (2020). A place-based education analysis of prospective teachers’ prior knowledge of science instruction in informal settings. International Journal of Educational Research, 99, 101497.

Sudibjo, N., & Prameswari, R. K. (2021). The effects of knowledge sharing and person–organization fit on the relationship between transformational leadership on innovative work behavior. Heliyon, 7(6), e07334.

Suleimanova, S. (2013). Innovative activity of the teacher: In the course of his professional formation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81, 395–399.

Taştan, S. B., & Davoudi, S. M. M. (2015). An examination of the relationship between leader-member exchange and innovative work behavior with the moderating role of trust in leader: A study in the Turkish context. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 23–32.

van Bommel, J., Randahl, A.-C., Liljekvist, Y., & Ruthven, K. (2020). Tracing teachers’ transformation of knowledge in social media. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 102958.

Wijayanto, A. D., Fajriah, S. N., & Anita, I. W. (2018). Analisis kemampuan komunikasi matematis siswa SMP ada materi segitiga dan segiempat. Jurnal Cendekia : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 97–104.

Yassin, F., Salim, J., & Ashaari, N. S. (2013). The influence of organizational factors on knowledge sharing using ICT among teachers. Procedia Technology, 11, 272–280.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Our journal indexed by:

ISSN 2088-2866 (print) || ISSN 2476-9401 (online)

View Journal Visitor Stats