The effectiveness of Polya’s problem-solving strategy in enhancing mathematical word problem comprehension among fifth-grade students

Authors

  • Evi Fitriani Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/jpip.v18i2.93790

Keywords:

Polya’s problem-solving strategy, mathematical word problems, conceptual understanding, elementary mathematics education, heuristic learning

Abstract

Despite its importance, students' difficulty in comprehending and solving mathematical word problems persists in elementary education. This quasi-experimental study examines the effectiveness of Polya’s four-step problem-solving strategy in improving this competency. Fifth-grade students (N=45) from SD Negeri 7 Buntok were assigned to an experimental group (taught using Polya’s strategy) and a control group (conventional instruction). A pretest-posttest design with a mathematical word problem test, scored via an analytic rubric, measured competency in problem understanding, solution process, accuracy, and answer correctness. Results showed a significantly greater improvement in the experimental group (pretest M=58.2, posttest M=78.6) compared to the control group (pretest M=56.9, posttest M=65.3). Statistical analysis (independent samples t-test) confirmed a significant difference between the groups' posttest scores (p < 0.05). The findings demonstrate that explicitly teaching Polya's strategy significantly enhances students' systematic problem-solving skills and conceptual understanding of word problems. This study provides empirical evidence for integrating structured heuristic strategies into primary mathematics curricula to build foundational problem-solving proficiency.

References

Alvesya, I., Gigir, C., Kurnia Tumalun, N., & Pakpahan, R. (2025). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Soal Cerita Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel Berdasarkan Langkah Polya. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 14(1).

Anugraheni, I., Gufron, A., & Purnomo, Y. W. (2025). The impact of realistic problem-based learning on mathematical connection abilities: evidence from elementary schools in Indonesia. Cogent Education, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2523078

Dookurong, I. D., Dissuo Arthor, Y., & Akwerty, E. (2025). A Systematic Review of the Integration of Collaborative Learning and Polya’s Problem-Solving Strategy for Enhancing Pre-service Teachers’ Critical Thinking. International Journal of Studies in Education and Science, 6(4), 395–428. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijses.5520

Gjoneska, B., Potenza, M. N., Jones, J., Sales, C. M., Hranov, G., & Demetrovics, Z. (2022). Problematic use of the Internet in low- and middle-income countries before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101208

Govender, R., Adendorff, S. A., & Rawoot, S. (2024). Preferred problem-solving methods employed by Grade 4 learners for measurement word problems. South African Journal of Childhood Education, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/sajce.v14i1.1571

Guntur, M., & Purnomo, Y. W. (2024). A Meta-Analysis of Self-Regulated Learning Interventions Studies on Learning Outcomes in Online and Blended Environments. Online Learning Journal, 28(3), 563–584. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i3.4025

Ismail, S. N., Busthami Nur, A. H., Raman, A., & Purnomo, Y. W. (2019). A mixed-method study of the epistemological teacher-beliefs towards educational research in classroom teaching practices. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12426a

Istikomah, E., Dewi, N. Y., & Azzahra, S. A. (2025). Description of the Expertise of Mathematics Education Lecturers at Riau Islamic University Based on Publication Works: Systematic Literature Review. Mathematics Research and Education Journal, 9(2), 27–41.

Li, D., Osman, S., & Alhassora, N. S. A. (2025). Unlocking Spatial Wisdom: A Polya-Inspired Approach to Strengthening Year 5 Students’ Higher-Order Thinking Skills. International Journal of Instruction, 18(2), 593–614. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.18232a

Lindström, M., Johansson, S., & Borger, L. (2025). Does formal teacher competence matter for students’ mathematics achievement? Results from Swedish TIMSS 2019. Educational Research and Evaluation, 30(1–2), 137–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2024.2367486

Polya, G. (1945). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton University Press.

Powell, S. R., & Fuchs, L. S. (2018). Effective Word-Problem Instruction: Using Schemas to Facilitate Mathematical Reasoning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 51(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059918777250

Pramudiani, P., Oktafiani, A. F., Aziz, T. A., & Purnomo, Y. W. (2017). Enhancing Conceptual Knowledge about Shape through Realistic Mathematics Education. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dasar.

Purnomo, Y. W., Pramudiani, P., Aziz, T. A., Kaur, A., Ismail, S. N., & Nuriadin, I. (2020). Indonesian Teachers’ Beliefs on the Gap Between Educational Research and Practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(12), 24–42. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.202v45n12.2

Purnomo, Y. W., Prananto, I. W., Fitriya, Y., & Kaur, A. (2024). The Role of Self-Regulation in the Relationship Between Adaptability and Engagement: A Case of Online Mathematics Learning for Elementary School Students. Online Learning Journal, 28(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i1.3849

Putri, M. M., & Toyib, M. (2025). Cracking sletv mysteries: Enhancing 8th graders problem-solving abilities through Polya’s approach, reviewed by initial math proficiency. Desimal: Jurnal Matematika, 8(3), 495–506. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v8i3.202529096

Sariev, H., & Savov, M. (2025). Sufficientness postulates for measure-valued Pólya urn sequences. Journal of Applied Probability, 62(3), 925–949. https://doi.org/10.1017/jpr.2024.109

Suryadi, D., Herman, T., & Prabawanto, S. P. (2024). Problem-solving Ability of Fifth-graders in Mathematical Word Problem. KnE Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i8.15625

Tsao, Y.-L. (2024). Enhancing Student’s Ability to Solve Mathematical Word Problems. US-China Education Review A, 14(8). https://doi.org/10.17265/2161-623x/2024.08.001

Vicente, S., Sánchez, R., & Verschaffel, L. (2020). Word problem solving approaches in mathematics textbooks: a comparison between Singapore and Spain. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(3), 567–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-019-00447-3

Vilianti, Y. C., Pratama, F. Y., & Mampouw, H. L. (2018). Reviewed from the Polya Stage. International Journal of Active Learning, 3(1).

Voskoglou, M. G. (2011). Problem-solving from Polya to nowadays: A review and future perspectives. In Progress in Education (Vol. 22, pp. 65–82). Nova Science Publishers.

Yang, X., & Kaiser, G. (2022). The impact of mathematics teachers’ professional competence on instructional quality and students’ mathematics learning outcomes. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101225

Downloads

Published

2025-11-17

How to Cite

Evi Fitriani. (2025). The effectiveness of Polya’s problem-solving strategy in enhancing mathematical word problem comprehension among fifth-grade students. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 18(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpip.v18i2.93790

Citation Check

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.