Psychometric development of an independence scale for students with mild intellectual disabilities

Authors

  • Andi Prabowo Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Edi Istiyono Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Farida Agus Setiawati Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21831/jpip.v17i2.91832

Keywords:

Student Independence, Mild Intellectual Disability, Psychometric Validity, Reliability, Adaptive Behavior

Abstract

Measuring the independence of students with mild intellectual disabilities requires a well-validated and culturally appropriate instrument as a foundation for designing effective educational interventions. However, in Indonesia, such tools remain limited. This study aimed to develop a non-cognitive Independence Scale for students with mild intellectual disabilities and to evaluate its psychometric properties, including validity, reliability, item difficulty, and discrimination. A 30-item Likert-scale instrument, rated by teachers, was constructed to measure three domains: Personal, Social, and Academic Independence. The scale was pilot tested on 100 students with mild intellectual disabilities at SLB Negeri Manggar. Quantitative analyses using R Studio included tests of item validity (corrected item–total correlations), internal consistency (Cronbach’s α), item discrimination (upper–lower group method), item difficulty indices, and normality of total scores (Shapiro–Wilk and Kolmogorov–Smirnov tests). All 30 items demonstrated acceptable validity (r ≥ 0.39) and high internal consistency (Cronbach’s α = 0.919). Item discrimination indices were satisfactory (D ≥ 0.30). Seventeen items (57%) were categorized as “Easy” (p > 0.70), while the rest showed moderate difficulty levels, and no items were too difficult (p < 0.30). The total scores were normally distributed (p > 0.05). Overall, the Independence Scale exhibited strong psychometric properties, indicating its suitability for assessing the independence of students. Future revisions are recommended to refine items that were identified as Easy to enhance discrimination among higher-performing students.

References

Adrien, J.-L., Courcy, A., Haelewyck, M.-C., & Seron, X. (2025). Profile and development of adaptive behavior in adults with autism and intellectual disability. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1166214

Andaru, M., Sari, M. A., & Handayani, T. (2022). Uji normalitas data menggunakan metode empirical distribution function dengan memanfaatkan MATLAB dan Minitab 19. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 4(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.30998/semnasristek.v7i1.6238

Arbiatin, E., & Mulabbiyah, I. (2020). Analisis kelayakan butir soal tes penilaian akhir semester mata pelajaran Matematika kelas VI di SDN 19 Ampenan tahun pelajaran 2019/2020. El-Midad: Jurnal PGMI, 12(2), 146–171. https://doi.org/10.20414/elmidad.v12i2.2627

Belcher, T., Sparkman-Key, N., Augustine, B., & Borden, N. (2023). ePortfolio: Advancing Human Services Education through Technology. International Journal of EPortfolio, 13(1), 69–82.

Creswell, John W & Creswell, J. D. (2023). RESEARCH DESIGN Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches Sixth Edition (Sixth Edit). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications Inc. file:///C:/Users/L13 Yoga/AppData/Local/Mendeley Ltd./Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Creswell, Poth - 2018 - Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design Choosing Among Five Approaches.pdf

Davison, M. L., Weiss, D. J., DeWeese, J. N., Ersan, O., Biancarosa, G., & Kennedy, P. C. (2023). A Diagnostic Tree Model for Adaptive Assessment of Complex Cognitive Processes Using Multidimensional Response Options. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 48(6), 914–941. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986231158301

DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downing, S. M., & Haladyna, T. M. (2006). Handbook of Test Development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers. http://www.ebookstore.tandf.co.uk

Drijver, H. E., Didden, R., & Schuengel, C. (2025). Reliability and Validity of the Diagnostic Instrument on Adaptive Behaviour. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 38(6). https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.70150

Embretson, S. E., & Reise, S. P. (2013). Item response theory for psychologists. Item Response Theory for Psychologists, 1–371. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410605269

Esteras, G., Carbajal, A. B., Chávez-Ventura, G., & Zegarra-López, A. (2024). Challenges in adaptive behavior assessment for intellectual disabilities: A Latin American perspective. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 70(1), 23–35.

Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of Convenience Sampling and Purposive Sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

García-Pintor, B., Guàrdia-Olmos, J., & Sánchez-Busqués, S. (2024). Attentional resources and independence in basic and instrumental activities of daily living in individuals with mild intellectual disability. Healthcare, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12020126

Garvin, A. D., & Ebel, R. L. (1991). Essentials of Educational Measurement. In Educational Researcher (5th ed.). prentice-Hall, Inc, Englevrcod Clifh, NJ. https://doi.org/10.2307/1175572

Ghalib, M. E. (2024). The level of daily life skills among individuals with mild intellectual disabilities and its relation to demographic variables in Central Sudan – Gezira State. Migration Letters, 21(S1), 512–528.

Hernández-Hernández, S., García-Gómez, A., & López-Ruiz, V. (2025). Assessing pragmatic skills in people with intellectual disability: A systematic review. Behavioral Sciences, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15010012

Kildahl, A. N., Hellerud, J. M. A., Halvorsen, M. B., & Helverschou, S. B. (2025). The Aberrant Behavior Checklist in a clinical sample of autistic individuals with intellectual disabilities and co-occurring mental health problems: Psychometric properties, factor structure, and longitudinal measurement invariance. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-024-06697-5

Kummeling, J., Vermeulen-Kalk, K., Souverein, V., van Dongen, L. C. M., Oomens, W., Janzing, J. G. E., Pop-Purceleanu, M., Kleefstra, T., & Egger, J. I. M. (2023). Measuring Adaptive Behavior in Patients With Mendelian Neurodevelopmental Disorders. Comparison of Abas-3 and Dutch Vineland Scales. Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 20(5), 453–461. https://doi.org/10.36131/cnfioritieditore20230507

Kummeling, J., de Vaan, M., & van Rijn, R. (2023). Measuring adaptive behavior in patients with Mendelian neurodevelopmental disorders: Comparison of ABAS-3 and Dutch Vineland Scales. Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s11689-023-09459-2

Losada-Puente, L., & Baña, M. T. (2022a). Assessment of Adaptive Behavior in People with Autism Spectrum Disorders through the ICAP. Behavioral Sciences, 12(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/bs12090333

Losada-Puente, L., & Baña, M. T. (2022b). Predicting adaptive behaviors in individuals on the autism spectrum as assessed by teachers and parents: An analysis based on ABAS-3. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 11(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11247607

Marianti, S., Rufaida, A., Hasanah, N., & Nuryanti, S. (2023). Comparing item-total correlation and item-theta correlation in test item selection: A simulation and empirical study. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 27(2), 133–145. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v27i2.61477

Matson, J., & Matson, M. (2011). Research in Developmental Disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(4), CO2. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-4222(11)00176-4

Meng, M., Peter, D., Mattner, F., Igel, C., & Kugler, C. (2018). Development and psychometric pilot-testing of a questionnaire for the evaluation of satisfaction with continuing education in infection control nurses. Nurse Education in Practice, 31(April), 77–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.05.003

Reeve, B. B., Hays, R. D., Bjorner, J. B., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Teresi, J. A., Thissen, D., Revicki, D. A., Weiss, D. J., Hambleton, R. K., Liu, H., Gershon, R., Reise, S. P., Lai, J. S., & Cella, D. (2007). Psychometric evaluation and calibration of health-related quality of life item banks: Plans for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Medical Care, 45(5 SUPPL. 1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlr.0000250483.85507.04

Sajewicz-Radtke, U., & Radtke, B. (2024). The Functional Social Maturity Scale (FSMS): Development and application. Psychiatria Polska, 58(Online First). https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/144

Saleh, N., Gamal, O., Eldosoky, M. A. A., & Shaaban, A. R. (2024). An integrative approach to medical laboratory equipment risk management. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54334-z

Santrock, J. W. (2011). Perkembangan masa hidup (13th ed., Vol. 2). Erlangga.

Scior, K., Patel, M., Goldsmith-Sumner, A., Hayden, N., Lee, J. Y., Lunsky, Y., Osborne, M., Richardson, L., Stewart-Brown, S., & Hastings, R. P. (2023). Development and initial psychometric properties of the Warwick–Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale – Intellectual Disability version. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 67(9), 893–900. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13039

Tassé, M. J., Schalock, R. L., Thissen, D., Balboni, G., Bersani, H. H., Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Spreat, S., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, D., & Navas, P. (2016). Development and standardization of the diagnostic adaptive behavior scale: Application of item response theory to the assessment of adaptive behavior. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121(2), 79–94. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-121.2.79

Yusuf, A. M., & Nurihsan, J. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas: Sebuah tinjauan komprehensif. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Indonesia, 8(1), 1–15.

Zorzi, S., Dalmonego, C., De Vreese, L. P., & Gomiero, T. (2023). Adult Independence Living Measurement Scale: Psychometric validation of a scale to estimate personal skills for independent living in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 67(6), 560–572. https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.13028

Downloads

Published

2025-11-26

How to Cite

Prabowo, A., Istiyono, E., & Setiawati, F. A. (2025). Psychometric development of an independence scale for students with mild intellectual disabilities. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 17(2), 175 – 186. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpip.v17i2.91832

Citation Check

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.