Mathematical problem solving of elementary students based on adversity quotient
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jpip.v17i1.90771Keywords:
Adversity Quotient, Problem Solving, Mathematics, Elementary SchoolAbstract
This study investigates fifth-grade students’ mathematical problem-solving abilities based on their Adversity Quotient (AQ) types and identifies error patterns across Polya’s problem-solving stages. Employing a descriptive qualitative design, the research was conducted at Keputran 2 Elementary School, Yogyakarta, involving 24 purposively selected students. Data were obtained through the Adversity Response Profile (ARP) questionnaire and a mathematical problem-solving test. The AQ results categorized students into four climbers, seven campers, and thirteen quitters. One student from each AQ type was further analyzed through their written responses. Findings revealed that climber-type students successfully completed all stages of Polya’s framework, demonstrating perseverance and accuracy yet showing limited reflective evaluation. Camper-type students completed all stages inconsistently, particularly in verifying their results. Quitter-type students were unable to complete the stages, displaying conceptual and procedural misconceptions. The study concludes that differentiated instructional strategies are essential: quitters benefit from contextualized tasks and extrinsic motivation; campers require scaffolded feedback; and climbers need challenging problems to foster deeper reflection. These insights emphasize the pedagogical importance of integrating AQ-based differentiation to enhance mathematical problem-solving competence among elementary students.
References
Acosta-Gonzaga, E., & Ramirez-Arellano, A. (2022). Scaffolding Matters? Investigating Its Role in Motivation, Engagement and Learning Achievements in Higher Education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013419
Anwar, L., Sa'dijah, C., Murtafiah, W., & Huljannah, M. (2024). Adversity quotient of Indonesian prospective mathematics teachers in solving geometry higher-order thinking skills problems. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(1), 79–98. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i1.pp79-98
Apriyani, Y., & Uyun, M. (2023). The Role of Self-Resilience and Self-Efficacy to Increase Adversity Quotient. Psikoborneo: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 11(2), 162–162. https://doi.org/10.30872/psikoborneo.v11i2.10988
Bakar, M. A. A., & Ismail, N. (2020). Express students' problem solving skills from metacognitive skills perspective on effective mathematics learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1404–1412. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080433
Bolstad, O. H. (2023). Lower secondary students’ encounters with mathematical literacy. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 35(1), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00386-7
Chang, I. (2023). Early numeracy and literacy skills and their influences on fourth-grade mathematics achievement: a moderated mediation model. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-023-00168-6
Djatmika, E. T., & Astutik, P. P. (2023). Learning Profile Mapping for Differentiated Instruction Implementation. International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, 10(7), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0381.1007006
Fahrudin, D., Mardiyana, & Pramudya, I. (2019). The analysis of mathematic problem solving ability by polya steps on material trigonometric reviewed from self-regulated learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1254(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1254/1/012076
Fauziah, M., Marmoah, S., Murwaningsih, T., & Saddhono, K. (2020). The effect of thinking actively in a social context and creative problem-solving learning models on divergent-thinking skills viewed from adversity quotient. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 537–568. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.2.537
Hakim, F., & Murtafiah, M. (2020). Adversity Quotient and Resilience in Mathematical Proof Problem-Solving Ability. MaPan: Jurnal Matematika dan Pembelajaran, 8(1), 87–87. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2020v8n1a7
Ika Putri Wulandari, R., & Sugianto. (2019). Critical Thinking Ability in terms of Adversity Quotient on DAPIC Problem Solving Learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 8(1), 2019–2052.
Istiqomah, S. N., Suyitno, H., & Safa'atullah, M. F. (2021). Mathematical problem solving ability of 8th grade students in terms of adversity quotient using discovery learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(2), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v10i2.31699
Juwita, H. R., Roemintoyo, & Usodo, B. (2020). The Role of Adversity Quotient in the Field of Education: A Review of the Literature on Educational Development. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 6(3), 507–515. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.6.3.507
Kania, N., Juandi, D., & Fitriyani, D. (2022). Implementasi Teori Pemecahan Masalah Polya dalam Pembelajaran Matematika ( Yuhani et al ., 2018 ). Dalam pembelajaran matematika masalah bukan hanya dalam pembelajaran dan pola pikir kritisnya . Pembelajaran yang diberikan kepada siswa dalam seseorang . M. Progressive of Cognitive and Ability, 1(1), 42–49.
Karan, E., & Brown, L. (2022). Enhancing Student’s Problem -solving Skills through Project-based Learning Ebrahim Karan and Lisa Brown *. Journal of Problem Based Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 74–87. https://doi.org/10.54337/ojs.jpblhe.v10i1.6887
Kusuma, J. W., Hamidah, Mahuda, I., Sukandar, R. S., Santoso, E., & Jatisunda, M. G. (2021). Project-based learning with LMS moodle to promote mathematical problem solving and self-regulated learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1764(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1764/1/012135
Mafugu, T. (2024). Influences on Mathematics Achievement in Rural Schools: A Nested Study of Underprivileged Learners. Interchange, 56, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10780-024-09533-y
Musna, R. R., Juandi, D., & Jupri, A. (2021). A meta-analysis study of the effect of Problem-Based Learning model on students' mathematical problem solving skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1882(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1882/1/012090
Mutaqin, E. J., Asyari, L., Tetep, T., & Hamdani, N. A. (2021). Mathematical learning trajectory in primary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1987(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1987/1/012032
Nasution, I. Y. L. U., Mulyono, & Surya, E. (2024). Development of Mathematics Learning Tools Using Problem Based Learning Model to Improve Problem Solving Skills and Learning Motivation. Jurnal Perspektif, 8(2), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.15575/jp.v8i2.306
Niss, M., & Højgaard, T. (2020). Mathematical Competencies Revisited. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102, 9–28.
Nurkaeti, N. (2018). Polya’S Strategy: an Analysis of Mathematical Problem Solving Difficulty in 5Th Grade Elementary School. EduHumaniora | Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru, 10(2), 140–140. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v10i2.10868
Omiralievna, M. B. (2024). Development and Cultivation of Mathematical Literacy: A Pedagogical Perspective. Eurasian Science Review, 2(2), 94–99. https://doi.org/10.63034/esr-55
Ortiz, E. (2016). The Problem-Solving Process in a Mathematics Classroom. Transformations, 1(1), 4–4.
Padliadi, Marwan, & Zubainur, C. M. (2020). The thinking process of quitter students in solving open-ended mathematical problems. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012007
Poçan, S., Altay, B., & Yaşaroğlu, C. (2023). The Effects of Mobile Technology on Learning Performance and Motivation in Mathematics Education. Education and Information Technologies, 28(1), 683–712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11166-6
Polya, G. (1945). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton University Press.
Rahmayantri, A., & Priatna, N. (2022). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Kelas VII Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Aritmatika Sosial Berdasarkan Tipe Adversity Quotient. EduMatSains: Jurnal Pendidikan, Matematika dan Sains, 7(1), 197–208.
Rakhmawati, Y., & Mustadi, A. (2022). The circumstances of literacy numeracy skill: Between notion and fact from elementary school students. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 10(1), 9–18. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v10i1.36427
Rasyid, A., Rinto, R., & Susanti, M. (2023). Project-Based Learning through the STEM Approach in Elementary Schools: How to Improve Problem-Solving Ability. Journal of Education For Sustainable Innovation, 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.56916/jesi.v1i1.477
Saxena, S., & Rathore, B. (2025). Adversity Quotient as Determining Factor of Mental Health and Professional Quality of Life Among Healthcare Professionals: A Systematic Review. Annals of Neurosciences, 31(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531241231055
Siregar, R. N., Suryadi, D., Prabawanto, S., & Mujib, A. (2022). Cognitive Flexibility of Students in Solving Mathematical Problems: A Phenomenology Study. Kreano: Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 13(2), 354–369.
Smith, K., Maynard, N., Berry, A., Stephenson, T., Spiteri, T., Corrigan, D., Mansfield, J., Ellerton, P., & Smith, T. (2022). Principles of Problem-Based Learning (PBL) in STEM Education: Using Expert Wisdom and Research to Frame Educational Practice. Education Sciences, 12(10). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100728
Stoltz, P. G. (1997). Adversity quotient: Turning obstacles into opportunities. John Wiley & Sons.
Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(23), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310113
Tanjung, H., Sinaga, B., & Mansyur, A. (2021). Analysis of Student's Spatial Ability in terms of Van Hiele's Thinking Stages in Problem Based Learning. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 4(1), 470–485. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1675
Yuniara, R., Saminan, S., Abidin, Z., & Johar, R. (2023). Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability Based on The Steps of Ideal Problem Solving Viewed From Adversity Quotient (AQ). Al Khawarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 7(1), 36–36. https://doi.org/10.22373/jppm.v7i1.18211
Yustiana, Y., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2021). Mathematical problem solving ability of vocational high school students based on adversity quotient. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012092
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Siti Munawwarah, Aprilia Tina Lidyasari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
![Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License](/index.php/jpip/manager/setup/<a%20rel="license"%20href="http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/"><img%20alt="Lisensi%20Creative%20Commons"%20style="border-width:0"%20src="https:/i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png"%20/></a><br%20/>Ciptaan%20disebarluaskan%20di%20bawah%20<a%20rel="license"%20href="http:/creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/">Lisensi%20Creative%20Commons%20Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa%204.0%20Internasional</a>.){kind=link}