Sumardi Sumardi, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
Muamaroh Muamaroh, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta


Information technology-based instruction (e.g. using Edmodo) gains its popularity as it is likely to strengthen the role of teachers, schools, and parents for the sake of optimizing student learning outcomes. Therefore, this study explores how Edmodo was utilized to mediate digital class in English language teaching (ELT); how Edmodo facilitated students' engagement during the class; and how Edmodo mediated teachers to assess students' learning outcomes. A qualitative approach was employed and 286 students from a secondary school voluntarily participated during the study. Interviews, online mini-polling, and document analysis were deployed as data collection methods, and data were validated by triangulation and analyzed by following the interactive model of data analysis. It revealed that Edmodo was an effective mode to mediate digital class in ELT as the students could interact with their teacher, peers, and course contents effectively, both inside and outside the classroom. The students' engagement was also better in comparison to that of the face-to-face classroom. Finally, Edmodo well-mediated teachers to carry out the computer-based test (CBT); it was an accurate mode of assessment as no cheatings were facilitated; the validity, and reliability of the test could be favorably accomplished.


digital class, Edmodo, ELT classroom, language assessment

Full Text:



Ali, Z. (2015). A case study of tertiary students’ experiences using Edmodo in language learning. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 02(2015), 39-48. doi:10.15282/ijleal.v2.462.

Al-Said, K. M. (2015). Students’ perceptions of Edmodo and mobile learning and their real barriers towards them. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 167-180. http://www.tojet.net/articles/v14i3/14313.pdf.

Al-Zumor, A. W. Q., Al-Refaai, I. K., Eddin, E. A. B., & Al-Rahman, F. H. A. (2013). EFL Students' perceptions of a blended learning environment: Advantages, limitations, and suggestions for improvement. English Language Teaching, 6(10), 95-110. doi:10.5539/elt.v6n10p95.

Arkorful, V., & Abaidoo, N. (2014). The role of e-learning, the advantages, and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(12), 397-410. doi:10.4236/jcc.2014.22007.

Bada, S. O. (2015). Constructivism learning theory: A paradigm for teaching and learning. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66-70. doi:10.1080/1743727X.2014.908338.

Bakar, A. Y. A. (2016). “Digital Classroom”: An innovative teaching and learning technique for gifted learners using ICT. Creative Education, 7(1), 55-61. doi:10.4236/ce.2016.71006.

Cakrawati, L. M. (2017). Students' perceptions of the use of online learning Modes in ELT classrooms. English Language Teaching and Technology Journal, 1(1), 22-30. doi:10.17509/elt%20tech.v1i1.9428.

Çelik, S., & Aytın, K. (2014). Teachers’ views on digital educational modes in English language learning: Benefits and challenges in the Turkish context. The Electronic Journal for English as Second Language, 18(2), 1-18. doi:10.18178/ijlll.2017.3.2.108.

Chan, F. M. (2002). ICT in Malaysian schools: Policy and strategies. http://www.share4dev.info/kb/documents/3513.pdf.

Clarke, R. J. (2015). Transforming assessments into the digital domain. In Y. Zhang (Eds). Handbook of mobile teaching and learning. Berlin: Springer, pp. 1-22.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. California, CA: Sage Publication, Inc.

Daiute, C. (2013). Educational uses of the digital world for human development. LEARNing Landscapes, 6(2), 341-360. doi:10.36510/learnland.v6i2.605.

Dick, M., Sheard, J., Bareiss, C., Carter, J., Joyce, D., Harding, T., & Laxer, C. (2002). Addressing student cheating: Definitions and solutions. Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, 6(2), 172-184. doi:10.1145/960568.783000.

Dobson, C. (2012). Effect of academic anxiety on performance students with and without learning disabilities and how students can cope with anxiety at school (Unpublished Master Tesis, Northern Michigan University). https://www.nmu.edu/education/sites/DrupalEducation/files/UserFiles/Dobson_Cassie_MP.pdf.

Dodeen, H. M. (2014). Test-taking skills of secondary students: the relationship with motivation, attitudes, anxiety, and attitudes towards tests. South African Journal of Education, 34(2), 1-18. doi:10.15700/201412071153.

Ekmekci, E. (2016). Integrating Edmodo into foreign language classes as an assessment mode. Participatory Educational Research, (Special Issue 2016-I), 1-11. doi:10.17275/per.16.spi.1.1.

Franklyn-Stokes, A, & Newstead, S. E., (1995) Undergraduate cheating: Who does what and why? Studies in Higher Education, 20(2), 159-172. doi:10.1080/03075079512331381673.

Garrett, R. K., & Danziger, J. N. (2008). Disaffection or expected outcomes: Understanding personal Internet use during work. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(4), 937-958. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2008.00425.x.

Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175-191. doi:10.21890/ijres.23596.

Khodary, M. M. (2017). Edmodo use to develop Saudi ELT students' self-directed learning. English Language Teaching, 10(2), 123-135. doi:10.5539/elt.v10n2p123.

Kosar, G. (2016, 14-17 April). A study of EFL instructors’ perceptions of blended learning. Paper presented at International Conference on Teaching and Learning English as an Additional Language (GlobELT), Turkey. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042816313337.

Kuzu, A. (2008). Views of pre-service teachers on blog use for instruction and social interaction. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 8(3), 34-51. doi:10.4304/jltr.4.5.975-985.

Kwok, W. & Kong, S. C. (2016). Exploration of pedagogical use of social learning mode and word processing productivity tool in peer-assessment and self-editing tasks in elementary English writing classrooms. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 53(2), 284-309. doi:10.1177/0735633115597490.

Li, Y. W. (2016). Transforming conventional teaching classroom to learner-centered teaching classroom using multimedia: Mediated learning module. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(2), 105-112. doi:10.7763/IJIET.2016.V6.667.

Liu, W. & Yu, H. (2012). Effectiveness study of English learning in a blended learning environment. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(3), 524-530. doi:10.4304/tpls.2.3.524-530.

Lubis, A. H. (2018). ICT integration in 21st-century Indonesian English language teaching: Myths and realities. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(1), 11-21. doi:10.21831/cp.v37i1.16738.

Ma'azi, H. & Janfeshan, K. (2018). The effect of Edmodo social learning network on Iranian ELT learners writing skills. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1-17. doi:10.1080/2331186X.2018.1536312.

Maming, K. (2019). Activating EFL learners by integrating team-based learning with collaborative strategic reading. Litera, 18(2), 297-311. doi:10.21831/ltr.v18i2.23815.

McCabe, D. L, Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: A decade of research. Ethics & Behaviour, 11(3), 219-232. doi:10.1207/S15327019EB1103_2.

Miles, M., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd Ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.

Mokhtar, F. A. (2016). Rethinking conventional teaching in language learning and proposing Edmodo as intervention: A qualitative analysis. Malaysian Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2), 22-37. https://www.mojet.net/article/rethinking-conventional-teaching-in-language-learning-and-proposing-edmodo-as-intervention.

Mokhtar, F. A, & Dzakiria, H. (2015). Illuminating the potential of edmodo as an interactive virtual learning mode for English language learning and teaching. Malaysian Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 83-98. http://mjde.usm.my/vol17_1_2015/MJDE%2017(1)%202015%20-%20Art.%206(83-98).pdf.

Oduntan, O. E., Ojuawo O. O., & Oduntan E. A., (2015). A comparative analysis of student performance in Paper Pencil Test (PPT) and Computer Based Test (CBT) examination system. Research Journal of Education Studies Review, 1(1), 24-29. http://pearlresearchjournals.org/journals/rjesr/archive/2015/April/Abstract/Oduntan%20et%20al.html.

Pardede, P. (2019). Pre-service ELT teachers’ perception of blended learning. Journal of English Teaching, 5(1), 1-14. doi:10.33541/jet.v5i1.955.

Polat, E., Cagiltay, K., & Karasu, N. (2019). Tangible objects and mobile technology: Interactive learning environments for students with learning disabilities. In Y. Zhang & D. Cristol (Eds.). Handbook of mobile teaching and learning. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 2-21.

Purnawarman, P., Susilawati, S., & Sundayana, W. (2016). The use of Edmodo in teaching writing in a blended learning setting. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 5(2), 242-252. doi:10.17509/ijal.v5i2.1348.

Qomariyah, S., Gunarhadi, G., & Rejekiningsih, T. (2019). Edmodo in blended learning to increase language learners’ understanding of learning grammar for TOELT. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(1), 82-87. doi:10.24331/ijere.486653.

Rauschenberg, S. (2016). Connection for classrooms grant program annual report. https://gosa.georgia.gov/document/publication/2016-connections-classrooms-annual-report-december-2016/download.

Relan, A., & Gillani, B. J. (1997). Web-based instruction and the traditional classroom: similarities and differences. In B. Khan (Ed.). Web-based instruction. New Jersey, NJ: Educational Technology Publications, pp. 25-37.

Riasati, M. J., Allahyar, N., & Tan, K. (2012). Technology in language education: Benefits and barriers. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(5), 25-30. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.051.

Rock, T. C. & Wilson, C. (2005). Improving teaching through lesson study. Teacher Education Quarterly, 3(2), 77-92. doi:10.1108/20468251211224163.

Santikarn, B. & Wichadee, S. (2018). Flipping the classroom for English language learners: A study of learning performance and perceptions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 13(9), 123-135. doi:10.3991/ijet.v13i09.7792.

Shams-Abadi, B. B., Ahmadi, S. D., & Mehrdad, A. G. (2015). The effects of Edmodo on ELT learners’ writing performance. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 2(2), 88-97. doi:10.20961/ijpte.v1i2.5038.

Sutopo, H. B. (2002). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif: Dasar teori dan penerapannya dalam penelitian. [Qualitative research methodology: Basic theory and its application in research]. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret Press.

Thibaut, P. (2015). Social network sites with learning purposes: exploring new spaces for literacy and learning in the primary classroom. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 38(2), 83-94. https://www.alea.edu.au/documents/item/1174.

Trifoni, A., & Shahini, M. (2011). How does exam anxiety affect the performance of university students? Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 93-100.

Tsiakyroudi, M. (2018). Exploring the effectiveness of Edmodo on Greek ELT B1 learners' motivation to write. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 9(1), 96-112. https://rpltl.eap.gr/images/2018/RPLTL_9_full.pdf.

Ulloa, T. F. (2013, 22-23 February). Teaching with social networks: Facebook, Twitter, and Edmodo. Paper presented at The 16th Annual CSU Teaching Symposium, The California Maritime Academy, Vallejo CA. https://www.csum.edu/c/document_library/get_file?uuid= 281671e5-79fa-419b-8420-8f4e12344d4b&groupId=72269.

Yadav, R. (2016). Role of constructivism in learning. International Journal of Educational Studies, 3(3), 93-97. https://journals.esciencepress.net/index.php/IJES/article/view/1591.

Zakana, M. E.& Fomsi, E. F. (2019). Effect of social networking sites on students’ engagement and motivation in computer science in Bayelsa State, Nigeria. European Scientific Journal, 15(5), 1857-7431. doi:10.19044/esj.2019.v15n5p132.

Zuhdi, D., & Nurhadi. (2019). Culture based teaching and learning for Indonesian as a foreign language in Yogyakarta. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 465-476. doi:10.21831/cp.v38i3.26297.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i2.30065


  • There are currently no refbacks.


Social Media:



 Creative Commons License
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.

View Our Stats

Flag Counter