The adaptation of scientific reasoning of prospective teachers for primary education in the perspective of civic science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v18i1.36916Keywords:
prospective elementary school teachers, civic science, scientific reasoning, critical thinkingAbstract
This article aims to determine the adaptation of prospective elementary school teachers' scientific reasoning from a civic science perspective through seminar courses on elementary schools' educational problems. The issue of distance learning during the Corona Virus Disease (Covid) 19 pandemic in Indonesia has led to various highlights and analyzes. The learning scheme's quality and learning scheme are among the most popular questions in this learning scheme. This research uses a case study with a qualitative approach with data collection using interviews, observation, documentation, and literature studies. The results showed that the adaptation of the scientific reasoning of prospective elementary school teachers in a civic science perspective through the Seminar on Educational Problems in Primary Schools has several characteristics, that is: 1) educational problems in primary schools captured by dominant students in technological literacy, 2) study of educational problems in schools fundamental relates to the realization of smart and good citizens that reflected in attitudes and behavior in the Covid-19 pandemic situation, and 3) there is character building in the adaptation of scientific reasoning in the civic science perspective. Therefore, the research expects to have implications in developing civic education knowledge, especially in elementary school, which aims to strengthen the study of civic education.
References
Asante, L. A., & Mills, R. O. (2020). Exploring the socio-economic impact of COVID-19 pandemic in marketplaces in urban Ghana. Africa Spectrum, 55(2), 170–181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002039720943612
Bäckstrand, K. (2003). Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 3(4), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1162/152638003322757916
Browder, D. M., Spooner, F., Lo, Y., Saunders, A. F., Root, J. R., Ley Davis, L., & Brosh, C. R. (2018). Teaching students with moderate intellectual disability to solve word problems. The Journal of Special Education, 51(4), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466917721236
Budimansyah, D. (2012). Dimensi-dimensi praktik pendidikan karakter. Widaya Aksara Press.
Bugliarello, G. (2000). Reflections on technological literacy. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 20(2), 83–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046760002000201
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
Dale, C., & Pymm, J. M. (2009). Podagogy: The iPod as learning technology. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10(1), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787408100197
Dhull, I., & Sakhshi, M. (2017). Online learning. International Education & Research Journal, 3(8), 32–34.
Dunbar, K. N., & Fugelsang, J. (2005). Scientific thinking and reasoning. In The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. (hal. 705–725). Cambridge University Press.
Dunbar, K. N., & Klahr, D. (2012). Scientific thinking and reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Ed.), The oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (hal. 701–718). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.013.0035
Fischer, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Sodian, B., Hussmann, H., Pekrun, R., Neuhaus, B., Dorner, B., Pankofer, S., Fischer, M., Strijbos, J.-W., Heene, M., & Eberle, J. (2014). Scientific reasoning and argumentation: Advancing an interdisciplinary research agenda in education. Frontline Learning Research, 2(3), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.14786/flr.v2i2.96
Gars, U., & Skov, H. (2016). The TECS model leads to active use of technology in home care. Nordic Journal of Nursing Research, 37(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057158516662431
Glenn, C. W. (2018). Adding the human touch to asynchronous online learning. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 19(4), 381–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1521025116634104
Huber, C. R., & Kuncel, N. R. (2016). Does college teach critical thinking? A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 431–468. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315605917
Hwang, N., Reyes, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2016). Who holds a fixed mindset and whom does it harm in Mathematics? Youth & Society, 51(2), 247–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X16670058
Lickona, T. (2009). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books.
Lickona, T. (2015). Character matters; Persoalan karakter, bagaimana membantu anak mengembangkan penilaian yang baik, integritas dan kebajikan penting lainnya. Bumi Aksara.
Losch, A. (2018). Appreciating faith and culture in an age of scientific reasoning: On constructive-critical realism. Theology Today, 75(2), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040573618783419
Makuch, K. E., & Aczel, M. R. (2020). Eco-citizen science for social good: Promoting child well-being, environmental justice, and inclusion. Research on Social Work Practice, 30(2), 219–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731519890404
McPhillips, K. (2005). Global violence: Some thoughts on hope and change. Feminist Theology, 14(1), 25–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0966735005057799
Morin, L. L., Watson, S. M. R., Hester, P., & Raver, S. (2017). The use of a bar model drawing to teach word problem solving to students with mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 40(2), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717690116
Mueller, J. F., Taylor, H. K., Brakke, K., Drysdale, M., Kelly, K., Levine, G. M., & Ronquillo-Adachi, J. (2020). Assessment of scientific inquiry and critical thinking: Measuring APA goal 2 student learning outcomes. Teaching of Psychology, 47(4), 274–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320945114
Nagy Kem, G. (2016). Developing problem-solving skills. Mathematics Competitions, 29, 26–40.
Naini, F. B. (2012). Black swans – The basis of scientific reasoning. Journal of Orthodontics, 39(4), 243–244. https://doi.org/10.1179/1465312512Z.00000000048
Roohr, K. C., & Burkander, K. (2020). Exploring critical thinking as an outcome for students enrolled in community colleges. Community College Review, 48(3), 330–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091552120923402
Schiefer, J., Golle, J., Tibus, M., & Oschatz, K. (2019). Scientific reasoning in elementary school children: Assessment of the inquiry cycle. Journal of Advanced Academics, 30(2), 144–177. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18825152
Schrempf-Stirling, J., & Palazzo, G. (2013). Upstream corporate social responsibility: The evolution from contract responsibility to full producer responsibility. Business & Society, 55(4), 491–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650313500233
Shaw, R. D. (2014). How critical is critical thinking? Music Educators Journal, 101(2), 65–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0027432114544376
Somantri, M. N. (2001). Menggagas pembaharuan Pendidikan IPS. Remaja Rosdakarya dan PPs UPI.
Suharwoto, G. (2020, April 11). Pembelajaran online di tengah pandemi Covid-19, tantangan yang mendewasakan| Pusdatin. https://pusdatin.kemdikbud.go.id/pembelajaran-online-di-tengah-pandemi-covid-19-tantangan-yang-mendewasakan/
Svensson, R., Pauwels, L. J. R., Weerman, F. M., & Bruinsma, G. J. N. (2016). Explaining individual changes in moral values and moral emotions among adolescent boys and girls: A fixed-effects analysis. European Journal of Criminology, 14(3), 290–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370816649626
Turner, K. H., & Katic, E. K. (2009). The influence of technological literacy on students’ writing. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(3), 253–270. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.41.3.a
Vila-Henninger, L. (2016). The moral economies of self-interest. Sociological Perspectives, 60(1), 168–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121416629995
Waks, L. J. (2018). Thinking in Dewey’s experimentalist education: The contribution of the internet and digital tools. ECNU Review of Education, 1(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.30926/ecnuroe2018010201
Zimmerman, C. (2000). The development of scientific reasoning skills. Developmental Review, 20(1), 99–149. https://doi.org/10.1006/drev.1999.0497
Zimmerman, C. (2005). The development of scientific reasoning skills: what psychologists contribute to an understanding of elementary science learning. https://www.informalscience.org/development-scientific-reasoning-skills-what-psychologists-contribute-understanding-elementary
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The authors agree to transfer the transfer copyright of the article to The Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan effective if and when the paper is accepted for publication.
Authors and other parties are bound to the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License for the published articles, legal formal aspect of journal publication accessibility refers to Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-SA).
