Item analysis test of science, Indonesian language, and mathematics using the rasch model in elementary schools
Rini Yaumi Habibah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Indonesia
Nur Syarifah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Indonesia
Firmansyah Firmansyah, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Indonesia
Has'ad Rahman Attamimi, STIKES Griya Husada, Sumbawa, Indonesia
Abstract
Assessment of learning outcomes is an important component in the learning process to measure student learning achievements and assist teachers in determining appropriate learning strategies. This study aims to evaluate the quality of test items and student ability levels in Science, Indonesian Language, and Mathematics subjects using the Rasch model. The evaluation includes item reliability, person reliability, and the overall fit of the test items to the model. The research was conducted with 187 students from four public elementary schools in West Jakarta, using a quantitative method with a descriptive design. Data collection involved administering tests to the students, which consisted of 12 items in Science, eight items in Indonesian Language, and 10 items in Mathematics. The data were analyzed using the Quest software to provide comprehensive Rasch analysis results. The findings revealed that the consistency of student responses was weak, but the quality of the test items was good, as evidenced by high item reliability and low person reliability. In terms of model fit, all Science items met the Rasch model criteria, while in the Indonesian Language, one item (item 19) did not fit, and in Mathematics, three items (items 21, 27, and 28) failed to meet the criteria. The analysis of item difficulty levels showed a predominance of medium difficulty. The validity results indicated that 26 items were valid, and four items (1 in Indonesian Language and 3 in Mathematics) were invalid. Most students fell into the medium ability category across all subjects, indicating the need for further tutoring and personalized learning strategies to improve student performance.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Allen, M. J., & Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. Brooks/Cole.
Adams, R. J., & Khoo, S.-T. (1996). Acer Quest: The Interactive Test Analysis System. In L. J. P. Service (Ed.), Australian Council for Educational Research. The Australian Council for Educational Research.
Anggraini, D., & Suyata, P. (2014). Karakteristik soal UASBN mata pelajaran bahasa indonesia di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta pada tahun pelajaran 2008/2009. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 2(1), 57–65. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpe/article/view/2644/2199
Awaluddin, T., Wahyuni, L. D., & Afriadi, B. (2023). Konstruksi Alat Ukur dalam Pendidikan. UNJ Press.
Azizah, I., & Supahar. (2023). Analisis kualitas butir soal penilaian harian bersama Ifisika kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Patikraja. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 10(02), 90–104. https://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/pfisika/index
Azizah, N., Suseno, M., & Hayat, B. (2021). Item Analysis of the Rasch Model Items in the Final Semester Exam Indonesian Language Lesson. World Journal of English Language, 12(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v12n1p15
Dewi, H. H., Damio, S. M., & Sukarno, S. (2023). Item analysis of reading comprehension questions for English proficiency test using Rasch model. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 9(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v9i1.53514
Ernawati, E., Manik, F. Y., Trisnawati, R. D., Emiliana, E., & Yuliawati, S. (2022). Understanding and quality of minimum competency assessment (AKM) questions made by Integrated Science teachers in junior high schools. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 26(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v26i2.48670
Hanna, W. F., & Retnawati, H. (2022). Analisis kualitas butir soal matematika menggunakan model rasch dengan bantuan software QUEST. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(4), 3695. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i4.5908
Hartini, P., Setiadi, H., & Ernawati, E. (2021). Cognitive domain analysis (LOTS and HOTS) assessment instruments made by primary school teachers. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i1.34411
Isitiyono, E., Setiawan, R., & Harun. (2020). Pelatihan Penyusunan Instrumen Tes dan Analisisnya Secara Modern Bagi Guru-Guru IPA SMP Training of Test Instrument Development and Its Analysis for Modern Teachers of SMP. J. Pengabdian Masyarakat MIPA Dan Pendidikan MIPA, 4(1), 102–108. http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpmmp
Kunandar. (2015). Penilaian Autentik (Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013) : Suatu Pendekatan Praktis Disertai dengan Contoh. Rajawali Press.
Malonisio, M. O., & Malonisio, C. C. (2023). Validation of the teacher education institution’s entrance test using the Rasch model. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 6(3), 644–655. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v6i3.1726
Mardapi, D. (2012). Pengukuran Penilaian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Nuha Medika.
Maryani, I., Prasetyo, Z. K., Wilujeng, I., Purwanti, S., & Fitrianawati, M. (2021). HOTs Multiple Choice and Essay Questions: A Validated Instrument to Measure Higher-order Thinking Skills of Prospective Teachers. Turkish Journal of Science Education, 18(4), 674–690. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.97
Maulana, S., Rusilowati, A., Nugroho, S. E., & Susilaningsih, E. (2023). Implementasi Rasch Model dalam Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Diagnostik. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Semarang, 748–757. http://pps.unnes.ac.id/pps2/prodi/prosiding-pascasarjana-unnes748
Menteri Pendidikan Kebudayaan Riset dan Teknologi. (2022). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah. https://jdih.kemdikbud.go.id/detail_peraturan?main=3104
Mutakin, T. Z., Tola, B., & Hayat, B. (2022). Rasch model to analyze item quality and ability of fourth elementary school students. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 16(2), 2022. https://www.ijicc.net/images/Vol_16/Iss2/16172_Mutakin_2022_E1_R.pdf
Ngadi. (2023). Analisis model rasch untuk mengukur kompetensi pengetahuan siswa SMKN 1 Kalianget pada mata pelajaran perawatan sistem kelistrikan sepeda motor. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Otomotif, 6(1), 1–20. https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jpvo/article/view/63479
Pratama, D. (2020). Analisis kualitas tes buatan guru melalui pendekatan item response theory (IRT) Model Rasch. Tarbawy : Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.32923/tarbawy.v7i1.1187
Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan. (2019). Panduan penilaian tes tertulis. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/18344/1/PANDUAN%20PENILAIAN%20TERTULIS%202019.pdf
Rahmayani, A., Tiurlina, & Alfarisa, F. (2022). Analisis kualitas butir soal ulangan harian matematika di kelas IV MI Al-Islamiyah menggunakan Rasch Model. Jurnal PERSEDA, V(3), 170–177. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37150/perseda.v5i3.1716
Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori Respons Butir dan Penerapannya : Untuk Peneliti, Praktisi Pengukuran dan Pengujian Mahasiswa dan Pascasarjana. Nuha Medika.
Retnawati, H. (2016). Analisis Kuantitatif Instrumen Penelitian (Panduan Penelitian, Mahasiswa, dan Psikometrian). Parama Publishing.
Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173
Setyawarno, D. (2017). Upaya Peningkatan Kualitas Butir Soal dengan Analisis Aplikasi QUEST. https://www.scribd.com/document/619903922/PPM-Panduan-Quest
Sumardi. (2020). Teknik Pengukuran dan Penilaian. Deepublishing.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial (B. Trim (ed.)). Tri Komunikata Publishing House.
Suseno, E., & Sasongko, P. (2021). Mengukur Validitas Tes (E. Suseno (ed.)). Pemeral Edukreatif.
Suyata, P., Hidayanto, N., & Widyantoro, A. (2014). Standarisasi instrumen integrated assessment hasil belajar bahasa dengan program QUEST. LITERA, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v13i2.2588
Taylor, R. T., Bishop, P. R., Lenhart, S., Gross, L. J., & Sturner, K. (2020). Development of the BioCalculus Assessment (BCA). CBE—Life Sciences Education, 19(1), ar6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-10-0216
Tennant, A., & Conaghan, P. G. (2007). The Rasch measurement model in rheumatology: What is it and why use it? When should it be applied, and what should one look for in a Rasch paper? Arthritis Care & Research, 57(8), 1358–1362. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.23108
Tim Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan. (2019). Panduan Penilaian Tertulis. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan. https://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/18344/
van de Grift, W. J. C. M., Houtveen, T. A. M., van den Hurk, H. T. G., & Terpstra, O. (2019). Measuring teaching skills in elementary education using the Rasch model. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(4), 455–486. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2019.1577743
Wolfs, Z. G., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (Els). (2023). Assessing tonal abilities in elementary school children: testing reliability and validity of the implicit tonal ability test using rasch measurement model. SAGE Open, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231199041
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v28i2.75448
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Find Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan on:
ISSN 2338-6061 (online) || ISSN 2685-7111 (print)
View Journal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Visitor Statistics