Development of CBT Testlet Model for minimum competency assessment of numeracy literacy at elementary school level

Syukrul Hamdi; Yoppy Wahyu Purnomo; Kana Hidayati; Nurul Mu’minin

doi:10.21831/pep.v27i2.67473

Development of CBT Testlet Model for minimum competency assessment of numeracy literacy at elementary school level

Syukrul Hamdi, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Yoppy Wahyu Purnomo, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Kana Hidayati, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Nurul Mu’minin, Sekolah Dasar Negeri Margoyasan, Indonesia

10.21831/pep.v27i2.67473

Abstract

The application and development of accurate and reliable technology-based test instruments to assess aspects of knowledge and attitudes is an innovation teachers need to meet the demands of the National Assessment Policy. This research aims to apply the Computer-Based Test (CBT) Testlet Model with Local Wisdom Context as a New Form of Innovation in Supporting the Implementation of Minimum Competency Assessment and Integrated Character Survey. In addition, this research is a new solution for teachers in learning assessment. This research is development research. This research involved 11 experts, each from media and computer experts, material experts from mathematics education study programs, and measurement experts. The test instrument that has been developed has been proven to be valid using content validity and analyzed using the Aiken formula. In contrast, validity has been proven for the character survey using confirmatory factor analysis and reliability estimation using Cronbach alpha. This research produced a testlet model of CBT and test instruments in the form of a minimum competency assessment and an integrated character survey, which have proven valid and reliable.

Keywords

CBT testlet model; character survey; minimum competency assessment

Full Text:

PDF

References

Cahyanovianty, A. D., & Wahidin, W. Analisis Kemampan Numerasi Peserta Didik Kelas VIII dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM). Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2021; 5(2), 1439-1448.

Dammas, A.H.. Investigate Students’ Attitudes toward Computer Based Test (CBT) at Chemistry Course. Journal Archives of Business Research, 2016; Vol.4,No.6. pp. 58-71.

Fauziah, A., Sobari, E. F. D., & Robandi, B. Analisis Pemahaman Guru Sekolah Menengah Pertama (SMP) Mengenai Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM). Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2021; 3(4), 1550-1558

Gleason NW. Higher education in the era of the fourth industrial revolution. Singapure: Springer Published; 2018.

Ghorbani S, Jafari SEM, & Sharifian F. Learning to be: Teachers’ competences and practical solutions: A step towards sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability. 2018;20(1):20-45.

Hamdi, S.,Kartowagiran, B. & Haryanto. Developing a Testlet Model for Mathematics at Elementary Level. International Journal of Instruction, 2018; 11(3).

Handayu, A. R. Analisis Terhadap Butir Soal Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM) Tingkat SMP Ditinjau Dari Domain Literasi Matematis PISA (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia). 2020

Kamarudin, S.A. Character Education and students social behavior. Journal of Education and Learning. 2012’ Vol.6 (4) pp. 223-230.

Paap, M.C.S., Qiwei He, & Veldkamp, B.P.Selecting testlet features with predictive value for the testlet effect: an empirical study. SAGE Open April-June 2015:1-12

Popkova EG, Ragulina YV, & Bogovic AV. Industry 4.0: Industrial revolution of the 21st Century. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing;2018.

Resti, Y., Zulkarnain, Z., Astuti, A., & Kresnawati, E. S. Peningkatan Kemampuan Numerasi Melalui Pelatihan Dalam Bentuk Tes Untuk Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum Bagi Guru Sdit Auladi Sebrang Ulu Ii Palembang. Applicable Innovation of Engineering and Science Research (AVoER), 2020; 670-673.

Rohim, D. C. Konsep Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Varidika, 2021; 33(1), 54-62.

Rokhim, D. A., Rahayu, B. N., Alfiah, L. N., Peni, R., Wahyudi, B., Wahyudi, A., ... & Widarti, H. R. Analisis kesiapan peserta didik dan guru pada asesmen nasional (asesmen kompetensi minimum, survey karakter, dan survey lingkungan belajar. JAMP: Jurnal Administrasi dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 2021; 4(1), 61-71.

Sabani, D. & Mihardi, D. Improved characters and student learning outcomes through development of character education based general physics learning model. Journal of Education and Practice, 2015; Vol.6, No.21. pp. 162-171

Schinipke, D.L, & Reese, L.M. A Comparison Testlet-Based Test Designs for Computerized Adaptive Testing. Penn Street, Newtown, PA : A Publication of the Law School Admission Council, 1999

Sideridis, G. Tsaousis, I., & Al-Harbi, K. Improving measures via examining the behavior of distractors in multiple-choice tests: assessment and remediation. Educational and Psycological Measurement. 2016; Vol 77(I) 82-103

Van der Kleij, Fabienne Michelle. Computer-based feedback in formative assessment. PhD Thesis University of Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands. – Met een samenvatting in het Nederlands. 2013

Van Hong B, Tuyen T, & Luong NT. Teaching Capacity of Technology Teachers: Applying in the Training Program of Technology Teacher in Vietnam. American Journal of Educational Research. 2018;6(12):1662-1667.

Wainer, H. Precisien and differential item function an a testlet based test: the 1991 law school admission test as an example. Applied Measurement In Education,1995; 8, 157- 186.

Wainer, H, Bradlow, E.T & Wang, X. Testlet response theory and its application. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. 2007

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v27i2.67473