Analysis of mathematics test items quality for high school

Budi Manfaat; Ayu Nurazizah; Muhamad Ali Misri

doi:10.21831/pep.v25i1.39174

Analysis of mathematics test items quality for high school

Budi Manfaat, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia
Ayu Nurazizah, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia
Muhamad Ali Misri, IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia

10.21831/pep.v25i1.39174

Abstract

This study aims to determine the quality of the mathematics test items at high school in terms of validity, reliability, differentiation, difficulty level, and distractor effectiveness. This study is an evaluation type of research with a quantitative approach. The subjects in this study were 44 class XII students of SMKN 3 Kuningan and 39 class XII students of SMAN 1 Jalaksana. The results show that the majority (96.67%) of the items are declared valid in content by the experts. The test has very high reliability (0.90). The items have the ideal difficulty level. Most of the questions (70%) have medium difficulty, a few questions (6.67%) are very easy, and a few questions (20%) are difficult, and (3.3%) are very difficult. Most of the items (83.33%) have good discriminating power, and only a few questions (16.67%) have poor discriminating power. Most (90%) of the questions have a well-functioning answer choice, and only a few questions (10%) have the answer choice not functioning properly. Overall, this study can be concluded that the Mathematics Test Questions at SMKN 3 Kuningan are of good quality.

Keywords

item analysis; quality test; mathematics test

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arifin, Z. (2013). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pembelajaran (2nd ed.). Bumi Aksara.

Azwar, S. (2019). Reliabilitas dan validitas (4th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.

Baskoro, E. P. (2018). Perencanaan pelaksanaan dan evaluasi pembelajaran. Eduvision.

Hamimi, L., Zamharirah, R., & Rusydy, R. (2020). Analisis butir soal ujian Matematika kelas VII semester ganjil tahun pelajaran 2017/2018. Mathema: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.33365/jm.v2i1.459

Hartati, N., & Yogi, H. P. S. (2019). Item analysis for a better quality test. English Language in Focus (ELIF), 2(1), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.24853/elif.2.1.59-70

Iskandar, A., & Rizal, M. (2018). Analisis kualitas soal di perguruan tinggi berbasis aplikasi TAP. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i1.15609

Jannah, R., Hidayat, D. N., Husna, N., & Khasbani, I. (2021). An item analysis on multiple-choice questions: A case of a junior high school English try-out test in Indonesia. Leksika: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pengajarannya, 15(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.30595/lks.v15i1.8768

Kusaeri, K. (2014). Acuan dan teknik penilaian proses dan hasil belajar dalam kurikulum 2013. Ar Ruzz Media.

Kusaeri, K., & Suprananto, S. (2012). Pengukuran dan penilaian pendidikan. Graha Ilmu.

Kusumawati, M., & Hadi, S. (2018). An analysis of multiple choice questions (MCQs): Item and test statistics from mathematics assessments in senior high school. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 4(1), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v4i1.20202

Maryanes, F., Fitriati, F., & Salmina, M. (2018). Analisis kualitas butir soal ujian akhir semester mata pelajaran Matematika kurikulum 2013 kelas VII SMP Negeri 8 Banda Aceh. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Dasar 2018, 576–580. https://repository.bbg.ac.id/handle/737

Rahayu, R., & Djazari, M. (2016). Analisis kualitas soal pra ujian nasional mata pelajaran Ekonomi Akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 14(1), 84–94. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v14i1.11370

Rahmat, I., Masi, L., & Anggo, M. (2020). Analisis butir soal Ujian Akhir Semester (UAS) di masa pandemi pada mata pelajaran Matematika untuk tahun ajaran 2019/2020 kelas VII SMPIT Bina Insan Mandiri Al-Masrur Kendari. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 8(3), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.36709/jpp.v8i3.16624

Ratnawulan, E., & Rusdiana, A. (2015). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Pustaka Setia.

Setiawan, D. F. (2018). Prosedur evaluasi dalam pembelajaran. Deepublish.

Suharman, S. (2018). Tes sebagai alat ukur prestasi akademik. , . Retrieved from. At-Ta’dib: Jurnal Ilmiah Prodi Pendidikan Agama Islam, 10(1), 93–115. https://ejournal.staindirundeng.ac.id/index.php/tadib/article/view/138

Sukanti, S. (2011). Penilaian afektif dalam pembelajaran Akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Indonesia, 9(1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpai.v9i1.960

Sumiati, A., Widiastuti, U., & Suhud, U. (2018). Workshop teknik menganalisis butir soal dalam meningkatkan kompetensi guru di SMK Cileungsi Bogor. Jurnal Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Madani (JPMM), 2(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPMM.002.1.10

Supriadi, W. O. S., Rahim, U., & Zamsir, Z. (2019). Kualitas tes sumatif mata pelajaran Matematika kelas VIII semester genap SMP Negeri 20 Kendari tahun pembelajaran 2016/2017. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 85. https://doi.org/10.36709/jppm.v6i3.9142

Tilaar, A. L. F., & Hasriyanti, H. (2019). Analisis butir soal semester ganjil mata pelajaran Matematika pada sekolah menengah pertama. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia (JP3I), 8(1), 57–68. https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v8i1.13068

Wijayanti, P. S. (2020). Item quality analysis for measuring mathematical problem-solving skills. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(4), 1223–1234. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i4.3036

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100

Zein, M., & Darto, D. (2012). Evaluasi pembelajaran matematika. Daulat Riau.

Zuhera, Y., Habibah, S., & Mislinawati, M. (2017). Kendala guru dalam memberikan penilaian terhadap sikap siswa dalam proses pembelajaran berdasarkan kurikulum 2013 di SD Negeri 14 Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 2(1), 73–87. http://www.jim.unsyiah.ac.id/pgsd/article/view/2534

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i1.39174