Cognitive domain analysis (LOTS and HOTS) assessment instruments made by primary school teachers

Puji Hartini; Hari Setiadi; Ernawati Ernawati

doi:10.21831/pep.v25i1.34411

Cognitive domain analysis (LOTS and HOTS) assessment instruments made by primary school teachers

Puji Hartini, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Indonesia
Hari Setiadi, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Indonesia
Ernawati Ernawati, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka, Indonesia

10.21831/pep.v25i1.34411

Abstract

This research aims to qualitatively analyze the validity of items and the suitability of cognitive domains (LOTS and HOTS) assessment instruments on natural science subjects made by elementary school teachers in East Jakarta. The method used is descriptive qualitative method with analysis of observations, documents in the form of teacher-made assessment instruments, interviews, and results of expert validation which are analyzed by comparison analysis techniques. The observation results show that all schools use the questions that are available in textbooks owned by students for assessment and the results of analysis of teacher-made assessment instruments validated by experts, there are 81.25% items included in the LOTS category, while 18.75% are included in the HOTS category, so it can be concluded that: (1) the instruments used by elementary school teachers in East Jakarta have fulfilled the content validity, (2) the cognitive domain (LOTS & HOTS) on the instruments used by elementary school teachers are proportional, (3) the quality of assessments conducted by elementary school teachers in East Jakarta is good with a record of improvement, (4) the implementation of assessments conducted by elementary school teachers in East Jakarta has followed the assessment standards provided by the government.

Keywords

cognitive domain analysis; assessment instruments; science

Full Text:

PDF

References

Amirono, A., & Daryanto, D. (2016). Evaluasi dan penilaian pembelajaran Kurikulum 2013. Pustaka Pelajar.

Arikunto, S. (2011). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals (B. S. Bloom (ed.)). Longman.

Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How to assess higher-order thinking skills in your classroom. ASCD.

Cahyono, B., & Adilah, N. (2016). Analisis soal dalam buku siswa Matematika Kurikulum 2013 kelas VIII semester I berdasarkan dimensi kognitif dari TIMSS. Jurnal Review Pembelajaran Matematika, 1(1), 86–98. https://doi.org/10.15642/jrpm.2016.1.1.86-98

Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology, 29(2), 75–91. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30219811

Hartuti, M., & Handayani, D. E. (2019). Analisis penilaian kognitif Kurikulum 2013 kelas rendah MI Sabilul Ulum Mayong Jepara. El-Ibtidaiy:Journal of Primary Education, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24014/ejpe.v2i1.7370

Himmah, W. I. (2019). Analisis soal penilaian akhir semester mata pelajaran Matematika berdasarkan level berpikir. Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 3(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v3i1.698

Khaerudin, K. (2015). Kualitas instrumen tes hasil belajar. Jurnal Ilmiah Madaniyah, 5(2), 212–235. https://journal.stitpemalang.ac.id/index.php/madaniyah/article/view/26

Kurniasih, I., & Berlin, S. (2016). Revisi kurikulum 2013: Implementasi dan konsep penerapan. Kata Pena.

Maolani, R. A., & Cahyana, U. (2015). Metodologi penelitian pendidikan. Rajawali Pers.

Muklis, Y. M., & Oktora, S. R. (2015). Analisis deskriptif soal-soal dalam buku siswa Kurikulum 2013 (edisi revisi) dan BSE pelajaran Matematika SMP kelas VII ditinjau dari domain kognitif TIMSS 2011. Prosiding Sempoa: Seminar Nasional, Pameran Alat Peraga, Dan Olimpiade Matematika 1 2015, 71–78. https://publikasiilmiah.ums.ac.id/handle/11617/6132

Mulyasa, M. (2017). Pengembangan dan implementasi Kurikulum 2013. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nugroho, R. A. (2018). HOTS: Higher order thinking skill. PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Nurani, H., Artharina, F. P., & Kiswoyo, K. (2019). Analisis pelaksanaan penilaian kognitif berbasis kurikulum 2013 Sabiul Ulum Mayonglor Kabupaten Jepara. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Review, 2(2), 172–181. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/IJERR/article/view/17625

Pi’i, P. (2016). Mengembangkan pembelajaran dan penilaian berpikir tingkat tinggi pada mata pelajaran Sejarah SMA. Sejarah Dan Budaya: Jurnal Sejarah, Budaya, Dan Pengajarannya, 10(2), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.17977/um020v10i22016p197

Prasetya, T. I. (2012). Meningkatkan keterampilan menyusun instrumen hasil belajar berbasis modul interaktif bagi guru-guru IPA SMP N Kota Magelang. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 1(2), 106–112. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/article/view/873

Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture No. 104 of 2014 on the Learning Outcome Assessment by Educators in Primary and Secondary Education Levels, (2014).

Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture No. 20 of 2017 on the Team of Performance Assessor in the Ministry of Education and Culture, (2017).

Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture No. 21 of 2016 on the Content Standard of Primary and Secondary Education, (2016).

Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture No. 23 of 2016 on Educational Assessment Standard, (2016).

Samosir, A., Hasruddin, H., & Dongoran, H. (2019). Analisis kuantitas dan kualitas pertanyaan guru Biologi dan siswa materi Sistem Eksresi. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 7(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v7i1.10523

Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173

Setiawati, W., Asmira, O., Ariyana, Y., Bestary, R., & Pudjiastuti, A. (2019). Buku penilaian berorientasi higher order thinking skills. Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan, Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Situmorang, J. (2018). Higher order thinking skills: Pengembangan keterampilan berfikir tingkat tinggi. MDP Media.

Sudrajat, H. (2018). Analisis alat evaluasi pada mata pelajaran IPA di kelas V Sekolah Dasar Negeri 3 Nyerot Kecamatan Jonggat Lombok Tengah [Graduate thesis, Universitas Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang]. http://etheses.uin-malang.ac.id/11101/1/15761011.pdf

Suryanto, B., & Sutinah, S. (2011). Metode penelitian sosial. Kencana Media Group.

Wachyudi, I., Sukestiyarno, S., & Waluya, B. (2015). Pengembangan instrumen penilaian unjuk kerja pada pembelajaran dengan model problem solving berbasis TIK. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 4(1), 20–27. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jere/article/view/6928

Wardhani, D. F., & Putra, A. P. (2016). Pengembangan instrumen tes standar kognitif pada mata pelajaran IPA kelas 7 SMP di Kabupaten Banjar. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 75–82. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/5658

Wijayanto, P. A., Allifah, A., & Amirrudin, A. (2016). Evaluasi kualitas instrumen tes dalam pembelajaran Geografi di MAN 2 Kota Batu. Jurnal Geografi, 13(2), 101–113. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JG/article/view/7969/5523

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian kuantitatif. Jurnal Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v7i1.2100

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i1.34411