Evaluasi program diklat karya tulis ilmiah untuk widyaiswara Pusbangtendik Kemdikbud

Riyan Arthur

doi:10.21831/pep.v22i1.16749

Evaluasi program diklat karya tulis ilmiah untuk widyaiswara Pusbangtendik Kemdikbud

Riyan Arthur, State University of Jakarta, Indonesia

10.21831/pep.v22i1.16749

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengevaluasi program Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Karya Tulis Ilmiah (Diklat KTI) untuk widyaiswara yang diselenggarakan Pusbangtendik Kemdikbud. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode evaluatif, model Kirkpatrick. Penelitian ini melibatkan 32 widyaiswara. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menyebarkan kuesioner, observasi, studi dokumentasi dan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, Pertama; hanya ada tiga level Diklat KTI yang dilaksanakan sesuai peraturan, perencanaan serta memenuhi kriteria evaluasi, yaitu: level reaksi, pembelajaran dan perilaku. Kedua; Diklat KTI yang diselenggarakan Pusbangtendik Kemdikbud masih belum berdampak terhadap individu dan unit kerja. Rekomendasi atas Program Diklat KTI adalah dilanjutkan dengan perbaikan pada level dampak Diklat KTI.

Kata kunci: evaluasi, Diklat KTI, widyaiswara

THE EVALUATION OF SCIENTIFIC PAPER TRAINING PROGRAM FOR PUSBANGTENDIK KEMDIKBUD TRAINERS

Abtract

This research is aimed at evaluating the programs of education and training of scientific papers (KTI training) for trainers in Pusbangtendik Kemdikbud. This research used an evaluative method of Kirkpatrick model. This study involved 32 trainers. Data were collected by distributing questionnaires, observation, documentation study, and interview. The result shows that, first, there are only three levels of KTI Training implemented according to the regulation, plans and fulfillment of the evaluation criteria’; the three levels are reaction, learning, and behaviour levels. Second, KTI Training held by Pusbangtendik Kemdikbud still has not significantly showed any impact towards the individual and work units. Therefore, it is recommended for KTI Training program to continue with the improvement efforts on the impact level of KTI Training.

Kata kunci: evaluation, KTI training, trainer

Keywords

evaluasi; Diklat KTI; widyaiswara

Full Text:

Fulltext PDF

References

Alie, M. (2015). Motivasi Widyaiswara dalam penulisan karya tulis ilmiah (studi kasus pada peserta diklat karya tulis ilmiah di LAN). Irfani, 11(1), 96–107.

Amaddin, S., Fitriyah, N., & Irawan, B. (2015). Pendidikan dan pelatihan tot dalam meningkatkan kinerja pegawai widyaiswara di badan pendidikan dan pelatihan provinsi kalimantan timur. Jurnal Administrative Reform, 3(1), 148–160.

Anisah, Sukmawati, A., & Made, S. I. (2015). Pengaruh pelatihan terhadap kompetensi dan kinerja peneliti. http://repository.ipb.ac.id/handle/123456789/79084. Jakarta.

Arikunto, S., & Jabar, C. S. abdul. (2014). Evaluasi program pendidikan (2nd ed.). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arthur, R. (2015). Learning approach of problem solving for increase learning achievement of the civil engineering evaluation program. American Journal of Educational Research, 3(8), 964–967. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-3-8-3

Arthur, W., Bennett, W., Edens, P. S., & Bell, S. T. (2003). Effectiveness of training in organizations: A meta-analysis of design and evaluation features. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(2), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.2.234

Badu, syamsu Q. (2012). Implementasi evaluasi model Kirkpatrick pada perkuliahan masalah nilai awal dan syarat batas. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16, 102–129.

Bates, R. (2004). A critical analysis of evaluation practice: The Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27(3), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.04.011

Farjad, S. (2012). The evaluation effectiveness of training courses in university by Kirkpatrick model (case study: Islamshahr University). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2837–2841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.573

Hidayat, A. I., & Sa’ud, U. S. (2015). Model pendidikan dan pelatihan berbasis kompetesni bagi widyaiswara muda. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, xxii(2), 23–38.

Kirkpatrick, D. L., & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006). Evaluating training programs. San Francisco: Berret-Koehler Publisher, Inc.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif. Jakarta: UI Press.

Paita, S., Tewal, B., & Sendow, G. M. (2015). Pengaruh kompensasi dan lingkungan kerja terhadap kinerja pegawai melalui motivasi kerja pada Balai Pendidikan dan Pelatihan Keagamaan Manado. Jurnal EMBA, 3(3), 683–694.

Prywes, Y. (2012). Cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes of a coaching program. The International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching, X(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0278364914543793

Pusbangtendik. (2015). Laporan penyelenggaraan diklat kewidyaiswaraan penyusunan karya tulis Ilmiah. Depok.

Saad, M. A., & Mat, N. B. (2013). Evaluation of Effectiveness of Training and Development: The Kirkpatrick Model. Asian Journal of Business and Management Sciences, 2(11), 14–24.

Srivastava, E., & Agarwal, N. (2012). Evaluation of training Program. International Journal of Applied Research & Studies, I(III), 1–13.

Wijaya, A., & Sumarno. (2017). Evaluasi dampak pendidikan dan pelatihan pengembangan keprofesian berkelanjutan guru matematika di PPPPTK matematika Yogyakarta. Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v21i2.10113

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i1.16749