EFFECTIVENESS OF PROJECT-BASED LEARNING AND 5E LEARNING CYCLE INSTRUCTIONAL MODELS

Kijambu John Baptist; D. N. Utami; Bambang Subali; S. Aloysius

doi:10.21831/jk.v4i1.27107

EFFECTIVENESS OF PROJECT-BASED LEARNING AND 5E LEARNING CYCLE INSTRUCTIONAL MODELS

Kijambu John Baptist, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
D. N. Utami, PPs UNY
Bambang Subali, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
S. Aloysius, FMIPA UNY

10.21831/jk.v4i1.27107

Abstract

This study was aimed at determining and comparing the effectiveness of project-based learning and 5E learning cycle instructional models in improving the acquisition of new biological knowledge related to the human immune system. This quasi experiment study with a pretest-posttest non-equivalent control group design was conducted in SMAN 1 and SMAN 8 Yogyakarta, Indonesia during the academic year 2018/2019. A cluster sampling technique was used to select 3 eleventh grade classes of natural science from each school. The criterion referenced essay test was used to measure the students’ learning achievements and the data collected were analyzed using SPSS version 23. The results show that both PjBL and 5E learning instructional models were effective to improve the students’ ability to acquire new biological knowledge related to the human immune system. PjBL model was more effective than 5E learning cycle model in improving the students’ ability to acquire new biological knowledge related to the human immune system.

Keywords

project-based learning, 5E learning cycle, human immune system

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abbott, B. B., & Bordens, K. S. (2011). Research design and methods. A process approach. (8th Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Akar, E. (2005). Effectiveness of 5E learning cycle model on students’ understanding of acid-base concepts (Thesis unpublished report). The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences of Middle East Technical University, Turki.

Avikasari, Rukayah, &Indriayu, M. (2018). The effectiveness of science literacy to improve science achievement.Jurnal Kependidikan, 2(2), 221-234. Retrieved from:https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk/article/view/19167/pdf.

Bender, W. N. (2012). Project-based learning: Differentiating instruction for the 21st century. California: Corwin, A SAGE Company.

Bilgin, I., Karakuyu, Y., & Ay, Y. (2014). The effects of project-based learning on undergraduate students’ achievement and self-efficacy beliefs towards science teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(3), 469-477.

Bishop, J. (2016). Partnership for 21st century skills (P21). Diunduh dari https://www.imls.gov/assets/1/AssetManager/Bishop%20Pre-Con%202.pdf.

Bybee, R. W. (2009). The BSCS 5E instructional model and 21st century skills. Colorado Springs, CO: BSCS.

Bybee, R. W., Taylor, J. A., Gardner, A., Scotter, P. V., Powell, J. C., Westbrook, A. W., & Landes, N. (2006). The BSCS 5E instructional model: Origins and effectiveness. Colorado: BSCS.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education, Inc.

Crider, J. C. (2013). The 5E learning cycle vs. traditional teaching methods and how they affect student achievement, interest, and engagement in a third grade science classroom (Thesis unpublished report). Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana.

Du, X., & Han, J. (2016). A literature review on the definition and process of project-based learning and other relative studies. Creative Education, 7(07), 1079. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.77112.

EI [Education International] & ASCD [Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development]. (2015). The 2030 sustainable development goals and the pursuit of quality education for all: A statement of support from Education International and ASCD.

Fullan, M., & Langworthy, M. (2014). A rich seam: How new pedagogies find deep learning. London: Pearson.

Gronlund, N. E. (1977). Constructing achievement test (2nd ed.). Englewood Clifls, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing change/gain score. American Educational Research Associations Division Measurement and Research Methodology.

Hallermann, S., Larmer, J., & Mergendoller, J. (2011). PBL in the elementary grades:Step-by-step guidance, tools and tips for standards-focused K-5 projects (1st ed.). California: Buck Institute for Education.

Harvard Advanced Leadership Initiative. (20014). Education for the 21st century: Executive summary. Cambridge, MA.

Kizkapan, O., & Bektas, O. (2017). The effect of project-based learning on seventh grade students’ academic achievement. International Journal of Instruction, 10(1). 37-54. doi: 10.12973/iji.2017.1013a.

Landis, J. R., & Koch G. G. (1997). The measurement of the observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, International Biometric Society, 33(1), 159-174. Retrieved from httpp://www.jstor.org/stable/2529310.

McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. ICT: Providing Choices for Learners and Learning. Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 2007 (pp. 664-675).

Ministry of Education and Culture Republic of Indonesia (2012). Curriculum Document 2013. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.

Ministry of Education and Culture Republic of Indonesia. (2014). Concept and Implementation of Curriculum 2013. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.

Ministry of Education and Culture Republic of Indonesia. (2015). Strategic Plan for the 2015-2019. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.

Ministry of Education and Culture Republic of Indonesia. (2017). Press Conference for Middle School National Examination year 2017: To monitor, encourage and improve the quality of learning. Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.

Murti, P. R., Aminah, N. S., & Harjana. (2018). The analysis of high school students’ science literacy based on nature of science literacy test (NOSLiT). Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1097, 012003. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1097/1/012003.

Novaristiana R, N., Rinanto, Y., & Ramli, M. (2019). Scientific literacy profile in biological science of high school students. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(1), 9-16. doi: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v5i1.7080.

NYC Department of Education. (2009). Project-based learning: Inspiring middle school students to engage in deep and active learning. New York: NYC Department of Education.

OECD & ADB. (2015), Education in Indonesia: Rising to the challenge. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264230750-en.

OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Vol. I): Excellence and equity in education. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264266490-en.

OECD [Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]. (2016). PISA 2015 results in focus.

Patton, A., & Robin, J. (2012). Work that matters: The teacher’s guide to project-based learning. The Paul Hamlyn Foundation.

Purwani, L. D., Sudargo, F. & Surakusumah, W. (2019). Analysis of student’s scientific literacy skills through socio scientific issue’s test on biodiversity topics. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series, 1013, 012019. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012019.

Rasmawan, R. (2018). Developing student worksheet for inquiry-based chemistry to improve scientific process skills. Jurnal Kependidikan, 2(1), 98-115. Retrieved from https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk/article/view/11034/pdf.

Sam, C. K., Owusu, K. A., & Krueger, C. A. (2018). Effectiveness of 3E, 5E and conventional approaches of teaching on students’ achievement in high school biology. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 76-82. doi: 10.12691/education-6-1-12.

Scott, C. L. (2015). The futures of learning 3: what kind of pedagogies for the 21st century? Education Research and Foresigh: Working Paper, No. 15.

Siddiqui, U. (2016). Effectiveness of 5E learning cycle model of con-structivist approach on ninth-grade students’ understanding of colloids. PARIPEX- Indian Journal of Researh, 5(1), 171-174. Retrieved from https://www.worldwidejournals.com/paripex/file.php?val=March_2016_1459421513_56.pdf.

Subkoviak, M. J. (1988). A practitioner’s guide to computation and interpre-tation of reliability indices for mastery tests. Journal of Educatio-nal Measurement, 25(1), 47-55. doi:10.1111/j.1745-3984.1988.tb00290.x.

The Ontario Public Service. (2016). The towards defining 21st century com-petencies. The foundation document for discussion. Ontario, Canada.

TIMSS. (2015). Science–fourth grade: International science achievement. IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study. Retrieved from http://timss2015.org/download-center/.

Tuckman, B. W. (1993). The essay test: A look at the advantages and disadvantages. Nassp Bulletin, 77(555), 20-26.

Widiana, I. W., Suarjana, I. M., & Dewi, N. P. I. C. (2019). Optimizing project-based try activity to improve the dimension of students’ cognitive process. Jurnal Kependidikan, 3(1), 15-27. Retrieved from https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/jk/article/view/14422

World Economic Forum. (2019). The global risks report 2019. Insight report (14th ed.). Geneva: World Economic Forum.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v4i1.27107