Engineering the development of democratic citizenship education curriculum in the global era: A few perspectives from theoretical frameworks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v20i1.59915Keywords:
curriculum frameworks, democratic education, Deweyan perspectiveAbstract
There are weaknesses both from the perspective and effectiveness of Citizenship Education (CE) which are too oriented towards domestic problems in the context of facing global challenges and problems. Today it is necessary to change the orientation of the Civics curriculum which is globally oriented. In other words, it is necessary to engineer the Civics curriculum development. This paper attempts to present theoretical frameworks for engineering the development of a democratic and globally oriented Civics curriculum. There are at least six theoretical frameworks, namely the Birdcage Theory, Crystal Theory, Tree Theory, DNA Theory, Mushroom Theory, and Amoeba Theory. The six theories have different views, implications, and recommendations in curriculum engineering, including the Civics curriculum. This paper ends with the author's recommendations after considering both the strengths and weaknesses of the six theoretical frameworks.
References
Benavot, A., & Resh, N. (2003). Educational governance, school autonomy, and curriculum implementation: A comparative study of Arab and Jewish schools in Israel. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(2), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027022000022856
Blaug, R., & Schwarzmantel, J. (2016). Democracy: A reader. Edinburgh University Press.
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic Life. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Culp, J. (2019). Democratic education in a globalized world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367136550
Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. Penguin.
Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A. (1977). Research on curriculum and instruction implementation. Review of Educational Research, 47(2), 335–397. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543047002335
Huntington, S. P. (2003). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon & Schuster.
Jorgensen, C. G. (2017). Discovering John Dewey in the twenty-first century. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-58950-7
Kalidjernih, F. K. (2005). Post-colonial citizenship education : a critical study of the production and reproduction of the Indonesian civic ideal [Dissertation]. University of Tasmania.
Kincheloe, J. L., & Steinberg, S. R. (1997). Changing multiculturalism. Open University Press.
Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (2001). Hegemony and socialist strategy: Towards a radical democratic politics. Verso.
McKenna, E. (2007). Pluralism and democracy: individualism by another name. In Education for a Democratic Society (pp. 143–153). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203999_015
Miller, C. R. (2020). Living under post-democracy. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429317446
Resh, N., & Benavot, A. (2009). Educational governance, school autonomy, and curriculum implementation: diversity and uniformity in knowledge offerings to Israeli pupils. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 41(1), 67–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220270802446826
Rivero, C. M. (2007). John Dewey and the necessity of a democratic civic education. In Education for a democratic society (pp. 11–19). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401203999_003
Steinberg, S. R., Kincheloe, J. L., & Hinchey, P. H. (1999). The post-formal reader cognition and education. Psychology Press.
Waghid, Y. (2013). African philosophy of education reconsidered. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203538166
Waghid, Y. (2014). Philosophical remarks on Nelson Mandela’s education legacy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(1), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.874625
Wang, L. (2019). John Dewey’s Democratic education and its Influence on pedagogy in China 1917-1937. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27568-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
- Authors certify that the work reported here has not been published before and contains no materials the publication of which would violate any copyright or other personal or proprietary right of any person or entity.
- Authors transfer or license the copyright of publishing to Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan to publish the article in any media format, to share, to disseminate, to index, and to maximize the impact of the article in any databases.
- Authors hereby agree to transfer a copyright for publishing to Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraanas a Publisher of the manuscript.
- Authors reserve the following:
- all proprietary rights other than copyright such as patent rights;
- the right to use all or part of this article in future works of our own such as in books and lectures;
- use for presentation in a meeting or conference and distributing copies to attendees;
- use for internal training by author's company;
- distribution to colleagues for their research use;
- use in a subsequent compilation of the author's works;
- inclusion in a thesis or dissertation;
- reuse of portions or extracts from the article in other works (with full acknowledgement of final article);
- preparation of derivative works (other than commercial purposes) (with full acknowledgement of final article); and
- voluntary posting on open web sites operated by author or author's institution for scholarly purposes, but it should follow the open access license of Creative Common CC BY-NC-SA License.