The evaluation of facilities and infrastructure standards achievement of vocational high school in the Special Region of Yogyakarta

Sugiyono Sugiyono, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

Abstract


The objectives of the study are to determine (1) the achievement of standard facilities and infrastructure for vocational high school in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, (2) the supporting factors for achieving the standard of facilities and infrastructure, and (3) the inhibiting factors for achieving the standard of facilities and infrastructure. This study employed an evaluation research method with a survey approach. The research sample was six vocational high schools in the Special Region of Yogyakarta, which was chosen through purposive sampling, taking into Cluster 1, Cluster 2, and Cluster 3. Data collection techniques used were Focused Group Discussion techniques, questionnaires, documents, observations, and interviews. The validity of the questionnaire instrument used expert validation. Analysis of quantitative data was conducted through descriptive analysis techniques and qualitative data with interactive analysis models. The results of the study show that (1) the standard of facilities shows that the average school data has met facilities and infrastructure standards, (2) the supporting factors for achieving the standard of facilities and infrastructure are (a) the principal's policy in developing facilities and infrastructure, (b) government support through programs to develop and achieve national education standards, (c) community support through school committees, (d) education board support, and (3) the inhibiting factors for achieving facilities and infrastructure standard are: (a) the lack of teacher media innovation developed in vocational high school; (b) the lack of maximization and maintenance of infrastructure in vocational high school; (c) the lack of support in classrooms and workshops, especially in the connectivity aspect.


Keywords


study; national standards; facilities and infrastructure

Full Text:

PDF

References


Admiraal, W., Janssen, T., Huizenga, J., Kranenburg, F., Taconis, R., & Corda, A. (2014). E-assessment of student-teachers’ competence as new teachers. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 13(4), 21–29. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/155517/

Alba, C. (2011). Strategi peningkatan mutu pendidikan di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 10(24), 1184–1190. https://journals.itb.ac.id/index.php/sostek/article/view/1080

Bansal, R. K. (2004). Need for strengthening of internship (rotatory housemanship) training in India. Education for Health: Change in Learning & Practice, 17(3), 332–338. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576280400002528

Bryson, J. M. (2004). Strategic planning for public and nonprofit organizations: A guide to strengthening and sustaining organizational achievement (3rd ed.). Wiley. https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Strategic+Planning+for+Public+and+Nonprofit+Organizations:+A+Guide+to+Strengthening+and+Sustaining+Organizational+Achievement,+3rd+Edition-p-9780787976606

Celik, S. (2011). Characteristics and competencies for teacher educators: Addressing the need for improved professional standards in Turkey. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(4), 264–278. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n4.3

Devi, V., Devan, D., Soon, P. C., & Han, W. P. (2012). Comparison of self-directed learning readiness among students experiencing hybrid and traditional curriculum. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, 6(6), 1047–1050. https://manipal.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/comparison-of-self-directed-learning-readiness-among-students-exp

Doherty, G. D. (2008). On quality in education. Quality Assurance in Education, 16(3), 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880810886268

Government Regulation Number 19 of 2005 concerning National Education Standards, (2005).

Hampf, F., & Woessmann, L. (2017). Vocational vs. general education and employment over the life cycle: New evidence from PIAAC. CESifo Economic Studies, 63(3), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifx012

Kalolo, J. F. (2015). The quest for quality science education experiences in Tanzanian secondary schools. Journal of Studies in Education, 5(2), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v5i2.7146

Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 20 of 2003 concerning National Education System, (2003).

Lee, Y.-M., Mann, K. V., & Frank, B. W. (2010). What drives students’ self-directed learning in a hybrid PBL curriculum. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(3), 425–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-009-9210-2

Lestari, Y. A., & Purwanti, M. (2018). The inter-relation among pedagogic, professional, social, and personality competences in nonformal school teachers. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 2(1), 197–208. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v2i1.10207

Masril, M., Ambiyar Ambiyar, & Rizal, F. (2020). Evaluasi pengelolaan laboratorium komputer di SMKN keahlian TKJ Kota Padang. Cakrawala: Jurnal Pendidikan, 14(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.24905/cakrawala.v14i1.1484

Morrison, D. M., K., M., & Cotter, K. (2006). Instructional quality indicators: Research foundations. Cambridge University Press.

Munro, C. R. (2005). “Best practices” in teaching and learning: Challenging current paradigms and redefining their role in education. College Quarterly, 8(3), 8–19. http://collegequarterly.ca/2005-vol08-num03-summer/munro.html

Nugroho, N. (2015). Evaluasi implementasi pembelajaran praktik bengkel di Balai Latihan Pendidikan Teknik (BLPT) Yogyakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasional Teknik Mesin, 3(2), 107–114.

Nurfaisal, N. (2017). Usaha-usaha manajerial dalam pencapaian Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 12(1), 23–37.

Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S., & Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237–257. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737026003237

Purwanto, P., & Annisa, M. (2020). Evaluasi penerapan SLiMS (Senayan Library Management System) dalam pengolahan bahan pustaka di perpustakaan SMK Negeri 4 Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Kepustakawanan Dan Masyarakat Membaca, 33(1), 1–13. http://repository.lppm.unila.ac.id/26010/

Raharjo, S. B. (2013). Evaluasi trend kualitas pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(2), 511–532. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v16i2.1129

Regulation of the Minister of National Education of the Republic of Indonesia Number 24 of 2007 concerning Standards for Facilities and Infrastructure, (2007).

Rourke, A. J., & Coleman, K. (2011). Authentic assessment in elearning: Reflective and collaborative writing in the arts. In G. Williams, P. Statham, N. Brown, & B. Cleland (Eds.), Proceedings ascilite Hobart 2011 (pp. 1089–1095). Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. https://www.ascilite.org/conferences/hobart11/downloads/papers/Rourke-concise.pdf

Rusman, R. (2015). Curriculum implementation at elementary schools: A study on “best practices” done by elementary school teachers in planning, implementing, and evaluating the curriculum. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(21), 106–112. https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/24219

Saputra, B. D., & Sukirno, S. (2020). Kesiapan kerja siswa program Akuntansi pada sekolah menengah kejuruan. Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran, 4(1), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v4i1.24651




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v25i2.46002

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Find Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan on:

   

ISSN 2338-6061 (online)    ||    ISSN 2685-7111 (print)

View Journal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan Visitor Statistics