Analysis of confirmatory factors of principals' leadership training of vocational high school

Lia Yuliana, (Scopus ID: 57214097721) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Lantip Diat Prasojo, (Scopus ID: 57196040010); Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Awanis Akalili, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Indonesia

 10.21831/cp.v41i3.50496

Abstract


One of the main problems in the course of management in Vocational High School is the principal's leadership training problem. Great leadership training has an impact on improving the quality of schools, the quality of teachers, and the professionalism of teachers in carrying out educational activities. This research aimed to find out what is the result of Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) on leadership training indicators for the principals of Vocational High School based on the perception of teachers, principals, and students. The method used in this research is a quantitative method to find out the result of Confirmatory Factor Analysis leadership training for principals of Vocational High School. This research used a simple random sampling technique with 255 teachers, 57 principals, and 315 students as the sample. The data analysis applied is KMO (Keiser-Meyer-Olkin Measure of Sampling Adequacy) and Bartlett’s Test of Sphericity. Extraction Method with Principal Component Analysis. The result of the study shows that the teacher sample obtained the KMO value 0,737 which indicates sample suitability is high (>0,5), and the lowest value of MSA (Measure of Sampling Adequacy) is 0,550. Meanwhile, the highest is 0,852, communalities value and appropriate matrix components, loading factor on all variables have met the requirements above 0,40, and all factors on the leadership training instruments for the principal of Vocational High School have an AVE value greater than 0,5; thus, they have met reliability and can be accepted. The principal sample obtained the KMO value of 0,738, and the lowest value of MSA (Measure of Sampling Adequacy) is 0,556. The highest is 0,859 indicating communalities value appropriate matrix components. Loading factors on all variables are above 0,40, and all factors on the leadership training instruments for the principal of Vocational High School have an AVE value greater than 0,5. The student sample obtained the KMO value is 0,682, the lowest value of MSA (Measure of Sampling Adequacy) is 0,556 and the highest is 0,859; communalities value and appropriate matrix components, loading factor on all variables are above 0,40, and all factors on the leadership training instruments for the principal of Vocational High School have an AVE value greater than 0,5. Thus, they have met reliability and can be accepted.

Keywords


confirmatory factor analysis; leadership; principal

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abazi-Bexheti, L., Kadriu, A., Apostolova-Trpkovska, M., Jajaga, E., & Abazi-Alili, H. (2018). LMS Solution: Evidence of Google Classroom Usage in Higher Education. Business Systems Research, 9(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.2478/bsrj-2018-0003

Abu-Samaha, A. M., & Shishakly, R. (2008). Assessment of school information system utilization in the uae primary schools. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 5, 525–542. https://doi.org/10.28945/3260.

Akmaliyah, Karman, Mohammad Rosyid Ridho, & Khomisah. (2020). Online-based teaching of Arabic translation in the era of Covid 19 pandemic restrictions. IOSR Journal Of …, 25(5), 13–22. http://digilib.uinsgd.ac.id/id/eprint/31028

Aman, L. D. P., Sofwan, M., Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., & Yaqin, L. N. (2020). Factors affecting indonesian pre-service teachers’ use of m-LMS: A mix method study. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 14(6), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v14i06.12035

Bogdanović, Z., Barac̈, D., Jovanic̈, B., Popovic̈, S., & Radenkovic̈, B. (2014). Evaluation of mobile assessment in a learning management system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12015

Bahri, Fakhry Zamzam. 2015. Model Penelitian Kuantitatif berbasis SEM-AMOS. Yogyakarta: CV Budi Utama

Baglieri, D., Metallo, C., Rossignoli, C., & Iacono, M. P. (Eds.). (2014). Information systems, management, organization and control: Smart practices and effects. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978- 3-319-07905-9.

Benwari, N. N., & Dambo, B. I. (2014). Improving secondary schools management through transformational leadership approach and management information systems. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(6), 401–406. https://doi. org/10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n6p401.

Burke, M. (2010). Overcoming challenges of the technological age by teaching information literacy skills. Community & Junior College Libraries, 16(4), 247–254. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763915.2010.52 3327

Biasutti, M., & EL-Deghaidy, H. (2012). Using Wiki in teacher education: Impact on knowledge management processes and student satisfaction. Computers & Education, 59(3), 861–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.0 4.009

Cheng, E. C. K. (2017). Knowledge management strategies for capitalising on school knowledge. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 47(1), 94–109. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-08-2016- 0045

Choi, B., Poon, S. K., & Davis, J. G. (2008). Effects of knowledge management strategy on organizational performance: A complementarity theory-based approach. Omega, 36(2), 235–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.06.0 07

DeLone, W. H., & McLean, E. R. (2003). The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: A ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748

D.Scott Derue, et.al, Trait and Behavioral Theories of Leadership: An Integration and Meta-Analytic Test of Their Relative Validity, Journal of Personnel Psychology, Vol. 64, 2011.

Diat Prasojo, L. & Yuliana, L (2021). How is Social Media Used by Indonesian School Principals for Instructional Leadership?. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40 (1) 70-80, doi:10.21831/cp.v40i1.32925

Doherr, H., Christalle, E., Kriston, L., Härter, M., & Scholl, I. (2017). Use of the 9-item shared decision making questionnaire (SDM-Q-9 and SDM-Q-Doc) in intervention studies—A systematic review. PLoS ONE, 12(3), 1–16. https:// doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0173904.

Dorman, J. P., Fisher, D. L., & G., W. B. (2006). Learning environments, students’ perceptions of assessment, academic efficacy, and attitudes to science: A LISREL analysis. In D. L. Fisher & M. S. Khine (Eds.), Contemporary approaches to research on learning environments: world views (pp. 1–28).

Edelman, L. S., McConnell, E. S., Kennerly, S. M., Alderden, J., Horn, S. D., & Yap, T. L. (2020). Mitigating the effects of a pandemic: Facilitating improved nursing home care delivery through technology. JMIR Aging, 3(1), e20110. https://doi.org/10.2196/201

Erlina, L., Waluyo, A., Irawaty, D., Umar, J., & Gayatri, D. (2019). Instrument development and validation: Assessment of self efficacy for mobilization. Enfermería Clínica, 29(Supplement 2), 384–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. enfcli.2019.04.048.

Ghozali, Imam. 2005. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit UNDIP

Ghazali, C. M., Hasnida, N., Abdullah, Norazilawati, Zaini, Hazwani, S., Hamzah, & Mahizer. (2020). Student teachers’ conception of feedback within an assessment for learning environment: Link to pupil aspiration. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i1.25483

Gehlawat, M. (2014, April-Juni). School management information system an effective tool for augumenting the school practices. New Frontiers in Education, 57-64.

Ghaffarzadeh, Ş. A. M. (2015). Review article decision making based on management information system. Journal of Management Research and Analysis, 2(1), 98–107. http://oaji.net/ articles/2015/1875-1428995605.pdf.

Habibi, A., Yusop, F. D., & Razak, R. A. (2020). The role of TPACK in affecting pre-service language teachers’ ICT integration during teaching practices: Indonesian context. Education and Information Technologies, 25(3), 1929–1949. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10040-2

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. In European Business Review (Vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 2–24). https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hair et al. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis, Seventh Edition. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall

Hunt, E., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2002). Issues, examples, and challenges in formative assessment. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2002(89), 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.48

Hariri, H., Monypenny, R., & Prideaux, M. (2014). Leadership styles and decision-making styles in an indonesian school context. School Leadership & Management, 34(3), 284–298. https://doi. org/10.1080/13632434.2013.849678.

James, E. A., Milenkiewicz, M. T., & Bucknam, A. (2008). Participatory action research for educational leadership: using data-driven decision making to improve schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. https://doi. org/10.4135/9781483329369.

Kadir, A. Z. A., & Aziz, N. S. (2016). Learning Management System of higher education institution. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(9). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i9/88717

Kafkova, J., Zímová, P., Nečas, M., & Vašků, V. (2018). Prospective Controlled Study Evaluating Pull Test with Correlation Serum Iron , Ferritin , Tranferin , Vitamin B12 , Folic Acid in Patients with Alopecias in The Czech Republic Hair : Therapy & Transplantation. 8(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.4172/2167- 0951.1000149

Kasprzhak, A. G. & Bysik, N. V. (2015). Decision-making styles of Russian school principals. Russian Education & Society, 57(7), 590–613. https://doi.org/10.1080/1 0609393.2015.1096148.

Khine, M. S. (2015). Technology-enhanced learning and TPACK. In M. S. Khine (Ed.). New directions in technological pedagogical content knowledge research: Multiple perspectives. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, pp. 3–8. 12 Cakrawala Pendidikan, Vol. 40, No. 1, February 2021 doi:10.21831/cp.v40i1.31035 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-016- 9507-8.

Kuswaeri, Iwa. “Kontribusi Kepemimpinan Transformasional Kepala Sekolah Terhadap Motivasi Kerja Guru Smp Kabupaten Sumedang “, Jurnal Penelitian Manajemen Pendidikan Vol.1 No.1 Tahun 2016 ISSN:2548- 3978. (16 Februari 2018).

Kasim, N. N. M., & Khalid, F. (2016). Choosing the right learning management system (LMS) for the higher education institution context: A systematic review. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(6), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i06.5644

Lizarragaa, M. L. S. A., Baquedanoa, M. T. S. A., Olivera, M. S., & Closas, A. (2009). Development and validation of a decision-making questionnaire. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 37(3), 357–373. https://doi. 54 Cakrawala Pendidikan, Vol. 40, No. 1, February 2021 doi:10.21831/cp.v40i1.31268 org/10.1080/03069880902956959.

Md, G., & Hasnida, N. (2016). A reliability and validity of an instrument to evaluate the schoolbased assessment system: A pilot study. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 5(2), 148. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v5i2.4533

Moore, Z., Stallard, J., Tittemore, A., & Lee, J. Y. (2020). The COVID-19 pandemic: Opportunity for integration of educational technology. Journal of Dental Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/jdd.12344

Mtebe, J. S. (2015). Learning Management System success: Increasing Learning Management System usage in higher education in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology, 11(2), 51–64. http://ijedict.dec.uwi.edu/viewarticle.php?id=2005

Mukminin, A., Habibi, A., Muhaimin, M., & Prasojo, L. D. (2020). Exploring the drivers predicting behavioral intention to use m-learning management system: Partial least square structural equation model. IEEE Access, 8, 181356–181365. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3028474

Pallant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual - A step by step guide to data analises using SPSS. Book, 303.

Pornpandejwittaya, P. (2012). Effectiveness of AIS: Effect on performance of Thai-Listed firms in Thailand. International Journal of Business Research, 12(3), 84–94.

Prasojo, L. D., Wijayanti, W., Yuliana, L., Agus, N., Habibi, A., & Yaakob, M. F. M. (2020). Instruments’ validation of access to motivation, skills, and use of digital technology: Efl context in indonesia. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16788

Reyneke, M., Meyer, L., & Nel, C. (2010). School-based assessment: The leash needed to keep the poetic ‘unruly pack of hounds’ effectively in the hunt for learning outcomes. South African Journal of Education, 30(2), 277–292. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v30n2a339

Stajkovic, A. D., & Luthans, F. (2001). Differential effects of incentive motivators on work performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 580–590. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069372.

Silich, V.A, Savelev, A.O., & Isaev, A.N. (2016). Methodical approach to developing a decision support system for well interventions planning. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 127, 1–7. https://doi. org/10.1088/1757-899X/127/1/012016.

Slater, L. (2005). Leadership for collaboration: An affective process. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 8(4), 321–333. https://doi. org/10.1080/13603120500088745.

Supriadi, D., Usman, H., & Abdul jabar, C. (2021). The Moderation Effect of Information Systems on Vocational High School Principal Decision-Making Model. Cakrawala Pendidikan 40 (1) 43-55, doi:10.21831/cp.v40i1.31268.

Telem, M. & Pinto, S. (2006). Information technology’s impact on school–parents and parents–student interrelations: A case study. Computers & Education, 47(3), 260–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. compedu.2004.10.008.

Triwiyanto, T. (2015). Pelaksanaan monitoring, evaluasi, dan pelaporan untuk penilaian kinerja manajerial kepala sekolah. [The implementation of the monitoring, evaluation, and reporting for assessing the school principals’ managerial performance]. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 34(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.21831/ cp.v1i1.4177.

Wiyardi, W. (2016). Kepemimpinan kepala sekolah, sistem informasi manajemen, dan formulasi rencana strategis. [Principal leadership, management information systems, and strategic plan formulation]. Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan, 23(2), 14–25. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index. php/JAPSPs/article/view/5630.

Yanti, H. (2013). Persepsi guru terhadap pengambilan keputusan oleh kepala sekolah di SMP Negeri Kecamatan Rambatan Kabupaten Tanah Datar. [Teachers’ perceptions of decision making by school principals at SMP Negeri Rambat Subdistrict, Tanah Datar Regency]. Jurnal Bahana Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(1), 84–92. http://ejournal. unp.ac.id/index.php/bahana/article/ view/2684.

Zaenal Fanami, D. M. (2014). Model Asesmen Kepemimpinan Pembelajaran Kepala Sekolah Pendidikan Dasar. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 130-145.

Zhao, J. (2010). School knowledge management framework and strategies: The new perspective on teacher professional development. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.009




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i3.50496

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


 

Social Media:

     

 

 Creative Commons License
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.

Translator
 
 web analytics
View Our Stats