Pre-service teachers’ agentive projections toward innovation in online English Language Teaching (ELT) classes

Santi Farmasari, Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
Lalu Ali Wardana, Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
Baharuddin Baharuddin, Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
Amrullah Amrullah, Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
Mh Isnaeni, Universitas Mataram, Indonesia
Husnul Lail, Universitas Mataram, Indonesia


This study examines the pre-service teachers’ agentive projections toward innovation in online English Language Teaching (ELT) classes. Employing teacher agency theory, this instrumental case study views projections as agentive when they are informed by the students’ ecological aspects (past and present), oriented to solve potential learning problems and improve learning outcomes. The study involved 84 pre-service teachers who were voluntarily asked to fill in a questionnaire, submit a lesson plan, and be interviewed. nVivo Pro was used to organize themes. The study indicates that the pre-service teachers, M=3.81, SD=.590, perceive that innovation in online ELT classes is closely related to the integration of information and technology. As a result, the students’ agentive projections were also oriented to solve technology and internet-based obstacles, added with innovative learning methods. The research findings may become important insights for the development of English teaching and learning in order to provide more capital for pre-service teachers creating ELT innovation in the future.


agentive projections; ELT innovation; online learning; English education

Full Text:



Allen, J. M. (2011). Stakeholders’ perspectives of the nature and role of assessment during practicum. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 742–750.

Anand, A., Gupta, R. K., Raj, R., Sinha, R., Kumar, P., & Raj, A. (2020). Information technology in ELT. International Journal of English Learning and Teaching Skills, 2(4), 1569-1583.

Araka, E., Maina, E., Gitonga, R., Oboko, R., & Kihro, J. (2021). University students’ perception on the usefulness of learning management system features in promoting self-regulated learning in online learning. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 17(1), 45–64.

Azhari, B., & Fajri, I. (2021). Distance learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: School closure in Indonesia. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(7), 1934-1954.

Batmang, B., Sultan, M., Azis, A., & Gunawan, F. (2021). Perceptions of pre-service teachers on online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 9(3), 449–461.

Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2015). The role of beliefs in teacher agency. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 624–640.

Biesta, G., Priestley, M., & Robinson, S. (2017). Talking about education: Exploring the significance of teachers’ talk for teacher agency. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(1), 38–54.

Bjørnsrud, H., & Engh, R. (2012). Teamwork to enhance adapted teaching and formative assessment. Policy Futures in Education, 10(4), 402–410.

Braun, V., & Clarcke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Buchanan, R. (2015). Teacher identity and agency in an era of accountability. Teachers and Teaching, 21(6), 700–719.

Butler, Y. G., & Liu, Y. (2019). The role of peers in young learners’ English learning: A longitudinal case study in China. In M. Sato & S. Loewen (Eds.), Evidence-based second language pedagogy: A collection of instructed second language acquisition studies (pp. 145–167). Routledge.

Cahyono, B. Y. (2018). Culture and innovation in essay writing project: EFL students’ perceptions. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(11), 1433-1440.

Chisholm, J., Alford, J., Halliday, L., & Cox, F. (2019). Teacher agency in English language arts teaching: A scoping review of the literature. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 18(2), 124–152.

Colley, K. E., & Lassman, K. A. (2021). Urban secondary Science teachers and special education students: A theoretical framework for preparing Science teachers to meet the needs of all students. Insights into Learning Disabilities, 18(2), 159–186.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.

Crosthwaite, P. R., Bailey, D. R., & Meeker, A. (2015). Assessing in-class participation for EFL: Considerations of effectiveness and fairness for different learning styles. Language Testing in Asia, 5(1), 1–20.

Ebersöhn, L., & Loots, T. (2017). Teacher agency in challenging contexts as a consequence of social support and resource management. International Journal of Educational Development, 53, 80–91.

Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.

Farmasari, S. (2020). Exploring teacher agency through English language school-based assessment: A case study in an Indonesian primary school. [Doctorate thesis, Queensland University of Technology].

Farmasari, S. (2021). From an international English language assessment framework to a teacher-based assessment: A study of primary English teachers’ agentive perspectives and projections. REID (Research and Evaluation in Education), 7(1), 35–45.

Gulnaz, F., Alfaqih, A. M., & Mashhour, N. A. (2015). Paradigm shift: A critical appraisal of traditional and innovative roles of an English teacher in Saudi ELT classrooms. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 5(5), 934-946.

Gupta, A. (2019). Principles and practices of teaching English language learners. International Education Studies, 12(7), 49-57.

Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers. Routledge.

Inayati, N. (2013). Systemic analysis of TESOL practitioners’ use of social media in the higher education sector. International Journal of Innovation in English Language Teaching, 2(2), 193–243.

Krashen, S. (1998). Comprehensible output? System, 26(2), 175–182.

Mali, Y. C. G., & Timotius, A. I. (2018). Project based activities in a call classroom: EFL students’ experiences. International Journal of Education, 11(1), 6–17.

Mukhametzyanova, F. G., Gutman, E. V., Panchenko, O. L., Elena A., V., & Kyzy, A. I. (2018). Information-network technologies in teaching foreign languages. Revista Dilemas Contemporáneos: Educación, Política y Valores, 9(4), 1–13.

Niiranen, S., Ikonen, P., Rissanen, T., & Rasinen, A. (2018). Development of teacher education students’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) through reflection and a learning-by-doing approach in craft and technology education. Design and Technology Education, 25(3), 35–46.

Ovbiagbonhia, A. R., Kollöffel, B., & den Brok, P. (2019). Educating for innovation: Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and of their own innovation competence. Learning Environments Research, 22(3), 387–407.

Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2013). Teachers as agents of change: Teacher agency and emerging models of curriculum. In M. Priestley & G. J. J. Biesta (Eds.), Reinventing the curriculum: New trends in curriculum policy and practice (pp. 187–206). Bloomsbury.

Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2015). Teacher agency: What it is and why it matters. In R. Kneyber & J. Evers (Eds.), Flip the system: Education from the bottom up (pp. 134–148). Routledge.

Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2016). Teacher agency: An ecological approach. Bloomsbury.

Roberts, J. (2018). Online learning as a form of distance education: Linking formation learning in theology to the theories of distance education. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies, 75(1), a5345.

Satori, D., & Komariah, A. (2014). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. Alfabeta.

Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: What works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33.

Silverman, D. (2016). Qualitative research. SAGE Publications Ltd.

van der Spoel, I., Noroozi, O., Schuurink, E., & van Ginkel, S. (2020). Teachers’ online teaching expectations and experiences during the Covid19-pandemic in the Netherlands. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 623–638.

Waite, L. T. (2018). The promotion of teacher agency in New York State’s teacher evaluation policies: A critical discourse analysis. State University of New York.

Walker, J. (2011). Being professional in English language teaching services: A Delphic panel study. Quality Assurance in Education, 19(4), 307–334.

Wedell, M. (2009). Innvation in ELT. ELT Journal, 63(4), 397–399.

Weldon, A., Ma, W. W. K., Ho, I. M. K., & Li, E. (2021). Online learning during a global pandemic: Perceived benefits and issues in higher education. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 13(2), 161–181.

Yan, Z., & Cheng, E. C. K. (2015). Primary teachers’ attitudes, intentions and practices regarding formative assessment. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 128–137.

Zhu, L. (2018). Innovative English teaching modes based on higher education informatization. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, 18(6), 3101–3106.

Ziyad, H. (2020). Technology-mediated ELT writing: Acceptance and engagement in an online moodle course. Contemporary Educational Technology, 7(4), 314–330.



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Find REID (Research and Evaluation in Education) on:


ISSN 2460-6995 (Online)

View REiD Visitor Statistics