An evaluation of vocational high schools in Indonesia: A comparison between four-year and three-year programs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v3i2.17077Keywords:
Vocational High School, The Standards for Vocational High Schools Graduates, 4-year Program Vocational High SchoolAbstract
The research aimed to gain insights into the quality of four-year program vocational high school (VHS) in Indonesia compared to four-year program VHS. This research was conducted based on the school graduate standard, business sector and industrial sector (or Dunia Usaha dan Dunia Industri (DUDI)) – or the performance of the graduates and alumni (the graduates' satisfaction). The research was conducted using Discrepancy Evaluation Model using 16 VHSs (eight four-year program VHSs and eight three-year program VHSs). The result shows that from the standpoint of the school, the graduates of the four-year program VHS are higher in quality than those of the three-year program VHS. The four-year program VHS graduates are more qualified in seven aspects: teamwork, discipline, tenacity, theoretical knowledge, confidence, creativity, and leadership. Meanwhile, using DUDI standpoint, the four-year program VHS graduates are also higher in quality than the three-year program VHS graduates. In addition, the four-year program VHS graduates are better in the quality of their discipline, tenacity, theoretical knowledge, practical skills, confidence, carefulness, creativity, and leadership. The four-year program VHS graduates have a higher level of satisfaction in terms of income than the three-year program VHS graduates. The higher quality of the four-year program VHS graduates has resulted from longer duration of the internship program (PKL) that provides them with reliable experience and skills concerning work-related problem-solving activities.References
Alisjahbana, A. S. (2014). Arah kebijakan dan program di bidang kependudukan, ketenagakerjaan, dan sumber daya manusia menghadapi globalisasi khususnya masyarakat ekonomi ASEAN. In Seminar Nasional Tantangan Kependudukan, Ketenagakerjaan, dan SDM Indonesia Menghadapi Globalisasi Khususnya Masyarakat Ekonomi ASEAN. Jakarta: Ikatan Praktisi dan Ahli Demografi Indonesia (IPADI).
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York, NY: Dover Publication.
Kaufman, R., & Susan, T. (1982). Evaluation without fear. London: New View Points.
Komariah, K. (2010). Memimpikan SMK di masa depan. In Seminar Nasional Prospek Pengembangan Pendidikan Vokasional dalam Era Globalisasi (pp. 127–132). Bandung: Culinary Education Study Program, FPTK, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Law No. 20 of 2003 of Republic of Indonesia on National Education System (2003).
Pardjono, P., Sugiyono, S., & Budiyono, A. (2015). Developing a model of competency certification test for vocational high school students. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 1(2), 129–145. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.21831/reid.v1i2.6517
Ramayani, C., Aimon, H., & Anis, A. (2012). Analisis produktivitas tenaga kerja dan pertumbuhan ekonomi Indonesia. Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi, 1(1). Retrieved from http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/ekonomi/article/view/738
Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture No. 20 of 2016 on the competence standard of primary and secondary education graduates (2016). Republic of Indonesia.
Stufflebeam, D. L., Madaus, G. F., & Kellaghan, T. (2000). Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1984). Systematic evaluation: A self-instructional guide to theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Thompson, J. F. (1973). Foundations of vocational education: Social and philosophical concepts. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors submitting a manuscript to this journal agree that, if accepted for publication, copyright publishing of the submission shall be assigned to REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education). However, even though the journal asks for a copyright transfer, the authors retain (or are granted back) significant scholarly rights.
The copyright transfer agreement form can be downloaded here: [REiD Copyright Transfer Agreement Form]
The copyright form should be signed originally and sent to the Editorial Office through email to reid.ppsuny@uny.ac.id
REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education) by http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/reid is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.