Discussion method accuracy in Islamic higher education: the influence of gender and teaching duration

Syahraini Tambak, Universitas Islam Riau, Indonesia
Hamzah Hamzah, , Indonesia
M. Yusuf Ahmad, , Indonesia
Erma Linda Siregar, , Indonesia
Desi Sukenti, , Indonesia
Mashitah Sabdin, , Malaysia
Ratu Bai Rohimah, , Indonesia

Abstract


Discussion method are increasingly popular in the learning, but in terms of its accuracy, mixed results are reported without clear reasons. This research aims to explore the impact of gender and teaching duration on discussion method accuracy in Islamic higher education. To evaluate the accuracy of the use of the discussion method, lecturer's teaching duration and gender, a quantitative study with a correlation approach was used. A research project, which deals with the use of discussion methods in lectures using questionnaires, was carried out in two faculties at two universities. Data were collected from 175 lecturers involved in this research. The analysis is differentiated based on the gender and level of teaching duration of lecturers in the competencies being assessed. The results show that the accuracy of the use of the discussion method is low and is related to the gender of the lecturer, that males perceive themselves to be higher in the use of the discussion method than females, and that even using method analysis with methods and implementation in the classroom. Lecturers who teach more than 30 years tend to have higher accuracy in using the discussion method than those with lesser tenure. The findings of this study have implications for the development of "the use of discussion methods in higher education" and it is necessary to examine the reasons behind this difference and to look for steps to improve the accuracy of the use of the discussion method.

Keywords


Discussion method; Islamic higher education; lecture; discussion method accuracy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdulbaki, K., Suhaimi, M., Alsaqqaf, A., & Jawad, W. (2018). The Use of the Discussion Method at University: Enhancement of Teaching and Learning. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(6), 118-128.

Adib-Hajbaghery, M., & Rafiee, S. (2016). Comparing the Effectiveness of Group Discussion and Lecture Methods on the learning of medical sciences students: A Review Study. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 16(1), 53-62.

Aghapour, S. A., Vakili, M. A., Karbasi, M., & Badeli, R. (2015). Comparison of the effect of student-based group discussion and lecture methods teaching on midwifery student's learning level. Scientific Journal of Education Strategies in Medical Sciences, 8(5), 281-286.

Alexander, R. (2018). Developing dialogic teaching: genesis, process, trial. Research Papers in Education, 33(5), 561-598.

Alghamdi, S. A. M. (2018). Comparison between traditional teaching method and discussion style to teach computer science courses and the impact of using discussion technique on the students marks. International Journal of Engineering and Computer Science, 7(8), 24181-24186.

Al-Husban, N. A. (2020). Critical Thinking Skills in Asynchronous Discussion Forums: A Case Study. International Journal of Technology in Education, 3(2), 82-91.

Badger, J. (2010). Classification and framing in the case method: discussion leaders' questions. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 34(4), 503-518.

Bartholomew, S. R., & Jones, M. D. (2021). A systematized review of research with adaptive comparative judgment (ACJ) in higher education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1-32.

Biney, I. K. (2018). Improving teaching and learning in higher education institutions: Is the discussion method the answer? Journal of Educational Studies, Trends, and Practices, 8(2), 235-247.

Bognar B., Sablić M. & Škugor A. (2019). Flipped Learning and Online Discussion in Higher Education Teaching. In: Daniela L. (eds) Didactics of Smart Pedagogy. Springer, Cham.

Boyd, M. P., and Markarian, W. C. (2011). Dialogic teaching: talk in service of a dialogic stance. Language and Education, 25(6), 515-534.

Boyle, J. T. & Nicol, D. J. (2003). Using classroom communication systems to support interaction and discussion in large class settings. Research in Learning Technology, 11(3), 43-57.

Brookfield, S.D. & Freskill, S. (2005). Discussion as a Way of Teaching: Tools and Techniques for Democratic Classrooms. San Fransisco: John Wiley & Sons.

Buhari, B. (2019). Practicing discussion in the form of a pyramid to improve students’ speaking performance and classroom interaction. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 7(2), 314-234.

Chen, C., Wu, M. & Wu, T. (2018). Discussion on the Teaching and Learning Innovation of Higher-Order Thinking. In: Wu TT., Huang YM., Shadiev R., Lin L., Starčič A. (eds). Innovative Technologies and Learning. ICITL 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 11003. Springer, Cham.

Chukwurah, L. N., Abbah, O. I., Iweama, C. N., Ogugua, J. E., & Ameh, J. (2020). Students' Achievement in Physical and Health Education: Effect of Discussion Teaching Method. Int. J. Hum. Mov. Sport. Sci, 8(3), 86-90.

Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha-An examination of theory and applications? Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98-104.

Dallimore, E. J., Hertenstein, J. H. & Platt, M. B. (2004). Classroom participation and discussion effectiveness: student-generated strategies. Communication Education, 53(1), 134-156.

Danner, R. B. & Musa, R. J. (2019). Evaluation of Methods Teachers Use in Teaching Shakespearean Drama in Senior Secondary Schools in Edo State. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(2), 324-338.

Dos Santos, L. M. (2020). The Discussion of Communicative Language Teaching Approach in Language Classrooms. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 7(2), 104-109.

Du, Y. (2018). Discussion on Flipped Classroom Teaching Mode in College English Teaching. English Language Teaching, 11(11), 92-97.

Ellis, R.A., Calvo, R., Levy, D., & Tan, K. (2004) Learning through discussions. Higher Education Research & Development, 23(1): 73-93.

Eutsler, L. (2018). Blended Literature Discussions Increase Preservice Teachers’ Enthusiasm for Teaching Reading. Journal of Literacy and Technology, 19(2),128-155.

Fisher, R. (2007). Dialogic teaching: developing thinking and metacognition through philosophical discussion. Early Child Development and Care, 77(6), 615-631.

Gall, M.D. and Gillett, M. (2010). The discussion method in classroom teaching. Theory Into Practice, 19(2), 98-103.

García-Ros, R. (2011). Analysis and validation of a rubric to assess oral presentation skills in university contexts. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 9(3), 1043-1062.

Garside, C. (1996). Look who's talking: A comparison of lecture and group discussion teaching strategies in developing critical thinking skills. Communication Education, 45(3), 212-227.

Guan-yu, G. & Bo-lan, Z. (2017). The Analysis on the Path of Improving the Effectiveness of Group Discussion Method in Large Ideological and Political Theory Courses—A Case Study of Mao Zedong Thought and the Theoretical System of Socialism with Chinese Characteristics Teaching. Education Teaching Forum, 32(1), 45-61.

Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586.

Hamzah, Sukenti, D., Tambak, S., & Tanjung, W. U. (2020). Overcoming self-confidence of Islamic religious education students: The influence of personal learning model. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 14(4), 582-589.

Harding, L. M. (2018). Keeping goliath on his toes: a case-discussion method for increasing engagement and individual accountability in large classes. Journal Marketing Education Review, 28(2), 131-135.

Hekmatpou, D., Seraji, M., Ghaderi, T., Ghahremani, M. & Naderi, M. (2013). Comparison of Group Discussion and Lecture Method in Students’ Learning and Satisfaction of Life Instructions Unit. Qom University Medical Science Journal, 7(1), 10-16.

Hikmawati, H., Ayub, S., & Sahidu, H. (2021). The Effect of the Discussion Method of Video Analysis of Physics Learning on High Level Thinking Skills of Students. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 6(1), 74-80.

Hodge, S. R. (2020). Quantitative research. In Routledge Handbook of Adapted Physical Education (pp. 147-162). Routledge.

Hoover, K. H. (2015). Teaching Methods of Teaching by Demonstration and Application. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 33(2), 90-101.

Huy, D. T. N., Hang, N. T., Trang, P. T. H., & Ngu, D. T. (2021). Discussion on Case Teaching Method in a Risk Management Case Study with Econometric Model at Vietnam Listed Banks–Issues Of Economic Education for Students. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(5), 2957-2966.

Jianbing, Z., Haiying, W., Yutian, H., Haobo, W., Detao, K., & Qian, W. (2021). Discussion on Case Teaching Method of Mechanical Majors in Petroleum Colleges Under New Situation. Science Journal of Education, 9(2), 63.

Keshavarzi, Z., Akbari, H., Forouzanian, S. & Sharifian, E. (2016). Comparison the Students Satisfaction of Traditional and Integrated Teaching Method in Physiology Course. Scientific Journal of Education Strategy Medical Sciences, 8(6), 21-27.

Kukuru, J. D. (2012). Encouraging Representation and Involvement of Learners on Discussion Method’s Features towards Ensuring Effective Teaching. Journal of Education, Society and Behavioural Science, 2(3), 271-289.

Larson, B. E. (2000). Classroom discussion: a method of instruction and a curriculum outcome. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5), 661-677.

Lehner, B. (2018). Work discussion in large groups: on modifying the teaching and learning method for universities of applied sciences in Austria. International Journal of Infant Observation and Its Applications, 21(2), 232-240.

Liu, Y. & Wang, X. (2019). Discussion on the Teaching Reform of Circuit Experiment Course. Proceedings of the 2019 5th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2019). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Atlantis Press. vol. 336. 176-179.

Lutfauziah, A., Al-Muhdhar, M. H. I., Suhadi, S. & Rohman, F. (2020). The learning methods of problem solving skills in Islamic boarding school: Discussion, exercise, and modeling. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Sains Murni, 7(1), 1-19.

Long, R. (2020). Dynamic Classroom Dialogue: Can Students Be Engaged Beyond Discussion?. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 20(3), 85-92.

Lyle, S. (2008). Dialogic Teaching: Discussing Theoretical Contexts and Reviewing Evidence from Classroom Practice. Language and Education, 22(3), 222-240.

McAvoy, P., Hunt, T., Culbertson, M. J., McCleary, K. S., DeMeuse, R. J., & Hess, D. E. (2021). Measuring student discussion engagement in the college classroom: a scale validation study. Studies in Higher Education, 1-15.

Monteiro, S., Almeida, L., Gomes, C., & Sinval, J. (2020). Employability profiles of higher education graduates: a person-oriented approach. Studies in higher education, 1-14.

Mosher, J., Gjerde, C. L., Wilhelm, M., Srinivasan, S. & Hagen, S. (2017). Interactive discussion versus lecture for learning and retention by medical students. Focus on Health Professional Education: A Multi-disciplinary Journal, 18(1), 16-26.

Naibaho, L. (2019). The integration of group discussion method using audio visual learning media toward students’ learning achievement on listening. International Journal of Research-Granthaalayah, 7(8), 438-445.

Ndie, E. C., Eze, A., Mbah, C. & Uwa, A. (2016). Evaluation of the Effects of Discussion Groups As Learning Method On The Test Performance of Student Nurses. Journal of Educational Research and Review, 4(4), 42-44.

Nicol, D. J. & Boyle, J. T. (2003). Peer Instruction versus Class-wide Discussion in Large Classes: A comparison of two interaction methods in the wired classroom. Studies in Higher Education, 28(4), 457-473.

Omwirhiren, E. M. (2015). Enhancing Academic Achievement and Retention in Senior Secondary School Chemistry through Discussion and Lecture Methods: A Case Study of Some Selected Secondary Schools in Gboko, Benue State, Nigeria. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(2), 155-161.

Parka, J. H., Schallert, D. L., Sanders, A. J. Z., Williams, K. M., Seo, E., Yu, L. T., Vogler, J. S., Song, K., Williamson, Z. H. & Knox, M. C. (2015). Does it matter if the teacher is there?: A teacher's contribution to emerging patterns of interactions in online classroom discussions. Computers & Education, 82(2), 315-328.

Parker, W. C. & Hess, D. (2001). Teaching with and for discussion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(3), 273-289.

Pollock, P. H., Hamann, K. & Wilson, B. M. (2011). Learning Through Discussions: Comparing the Benefits of Small-Group and Large-Class Settings. Journal of Political Science Education, 7(1), 48-64.

Ramezankhani, A., Pooresmaeili, A. & Rakhshandehrou, S. (2016). The Effect of group discussion method Educational on Knowledge, Attitude and Preventive Behaviors of high blood pressure in women 20-49 years old Islamshahr Cit. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences, 24(5), 11-19.

Renfors, S. M. (2021). Internationalization of the Curriculum in finnish higher education: understanding lecturers’ experiences. Journal of Studies in International Education, 25(1), 66-82.

Reznitskaya, A. & Gregory, M. (2013). Student Thought and Classroom Language: Examining the Mechanisms of Change in Dialogic Teaching. Educational Psychologist, 48(2), 114-133.

Reznitskaya, A., Anderson, R. C., McNurlen, B., Nguyen-Jahiel, K., Archodidou, A. & Kim, S. (2001). Influence of Oral Discussion on Written Argument. Discourse Processes, 32(2), 155-175.

Reznitskaya, A., Kuo, L., Clark, A.M., Miller, B., Jadallah, M., Anderson, R. C. & Nguyen‐Jahiel, K. (2009). Collaborative reasoning: a dialogic approach to group discussions. Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(1), 29-48.

Rizka, A. (2017). Improving listening and speaking skills by using animation videos and discussion method. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 30-36.

Roni, S. M., Merga, M. K., & Morris, J. E. (2020). Conducting quantitative research in education. Springer.

Safari, M., Yazdanpanah, B., Ghafarian, H. R. & Yazdanpanah, S. (2006). Comparing the effect of lecture and discussion methods on students` learning and satisfaction. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 6(1), 59-64.

Saira, N. Z., & Hafeez, M. (2021). A Critical Review on Discussion and Traditional Teaching Methods. Psychology and Education Journal, 58(1), 1871-1886.

Scharrer, E., & Ramasubramanian, S. (2021). Quantitative Research Methods in Communication: The Power of Numbers for Social Justice. Routledge.

Sudirman, A. (2018). The Influence of Teaching Tenses through Group Discussion Method towards Student’s Achievement In Tenses Mastery. Journal of English Education Studies, 1(2), 108-117.

Sukenti, D., & Tambak, S. (2020). Developing Indonesian Language Learning Assessments: Strengthening the Personal Competence and Islamic Psychosocial of Teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(4), 1079-1087. http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i4.20677.

Sukenti, D., Tambak, S., & Siregar, E. (2021). Learning Assessment for Madrasah Teacher: Strengthening Islamic Psychosocial and Emotional Intelligence. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(1), 725-740. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v13i1.552.

Sutphen, M. & Lange, T. (2015). What is formation? A conceptual discussion. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(2), 411-419.

Tambak, S. (2021). The Method of Counteracting Radicalism in Schools: Tracing the Role of Islamic Religious Education Teachers in Learning. MIQOT: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Keislaman, 45(1), 104-126. http://dx.doi.org/10.30821/miqot.v45i1.761.

Tambak, S., & Sukenti, D. (2020). Strengthening Islamic Behavior and Islamic Psychosocial in Developing Professional Madrasah Teachers. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(1), 65-78. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i1.26001.

Tambak, S., Ahmad, M. Y., & Sukenti, D. (2020). Strengthening Emotional Intelligence in Developing the Madrasah Teachers’ Professionalism (Penguatan Kecerdasan Emosional dalam Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru Madrasah). Akademika, 90(2), 27-38. https://doi.org/10.17576/akad-2020-9002-03.

Tambak, S., Amril, A., & Sukenti, D. (2021). Islamic Teacher Development: Constructing Islamic Professional Teachers Based on The Khalifah Concept. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1), 117-135. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v4i1.1055.

Tambak, S., Ahmad, M., Sukenti, D., & Ghani, A. R. B. A. (2020). Profesionalisme Guru Madrasah: Internalisasi Nilai Islam dalam Mengembangkan Akhlak Aktual Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam Al-Thariqah, 5(2), 79-96. https://doi.org/10.25299/al-thariqah.2020.vol5(2).5885.

Tümen Akyildiz, S. (2020). College Students' Views on the Pandemic Distance Education: A Focus Group Discussion. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 322-334.

Ugwu, L., Jatau, A., & Gwamna, S. K. (2020). Impact of discussion method on performance and retention in biology among senior secondary students in Katsina Education Zone, Katsina State, Nigeria. International Journal of Multidisciplinary and Current Educational Research, 2(6), 76-83.

Verano-Tacoronte, D., González-Betancor, S. M. & Bolívar-Cruz, A., et al. (2016). Valoración de la competencia de comunicación oral de estudiantes universitarios a través de una rúbrica fiable y válida. Revista Brasileira de Educação, 21(64), 39-60.

Welty, W. M. (1989). Discussion Method Teaching. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 21(4),40-49.

Yaqin, A. (2021). Developing Dilemma Discussion Method in Akhlaq Learning to Promote Student’s Moral Reasoning. Lentera Pendidikan: Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, 24(1), 42-55.

Ying, J. (2020). The Importance of the Discussion Method in the Undergraduate Business Classroom. Humanistic Management Journal, 5(2), 251-278.

Xue, H., Yuan, H., Li, G., Liu, J., & Zhang, X. (2021). Comparison of team-based learning vs. lecture-based teaching with small group discussion in a master's degree in nursing education course. Nurse Education Today, 105, 105043.

Yusuf, H. O., Guga, A. & Ibrahim, A. (2017). Discussion method and its effect on the performance of students in reading comprehension in secondary schools in Plateau State, Nigeria. European Journal of Open Education and E-Learning Studies, 1(1), 1-13.

Zaker, A., & Nosratinia, M. (2021). Development and validation of a quantitative research literacy questionnaire. International Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Research, 9(37), 11-30.

Zheng, X. (2021). Data Collection in Quantitative Research. In Research Methods for Student Radiographers (pp. 79-92). CRC Press.

Zhuang, L., Ren, D., & Liu, J. (2021, July). Discussion on Bilingual Teaching Mode in Colleges and Universities Based on “Learning Situation Analysis”. In 2021 2nd International Conference on Modern Education Management, Innovation and Entrepreneurship and Social Science (MEMIESS 2021) (pp. 220-224). Atlantis Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v41i2.40644

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




 

Social Media:

     


 

 Creative Commons License
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at http://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.

Translator
 
 web
analytics
View Our Stats

Flag Counter