The evaluation of lecturer’s improvement programs through academic culture and services

Connie Chairunnisa; Istaryatiningtias Istaryatiningtias

doi:10.21831/pep.v26i1.48384

The evaluation of lecturer’s improvement programs through academic culture and services

Connie Chairunnisa, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Indonesia
Istaryatiningtias Istaryatiningtias, Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA, Indonesia

10.21831/pep.v26i1.48384

Abstract

This study evaluated the program to improve postgraduate lecturers’ performance at Muhammadiyah University Prof. Dr. Hamka (UHAMKA). This study used a mixed-method sequential explanatory design. The primary data were collected using questionnaires for lecturers, study program coordinators, and students. The primary data were presented by observations and interviews with the Director of UHAMKA Postgraduate. The data analysis was carried out using differential statistics to support the interview and documentation results. The most prominent result was the Institute's concern for the lecturer problem, with the respondents’ answers showing strong concern (13%), concern (45.7%), and immediate concern (41.3%). The Institute's concern for lecturer problems was not high. Therefore, it needs to be increased. This study implied the need to conduct a follow-up program by motivating lecturers without functional positions to be immediately concerned and collect the required documents.

Keywords

academic culture; academic services; lecturer performance

Full Text:

PDF

References

Armstrong, M. (2000). Performance management. Kogan Page.

Boimau, S. V. (2014). Evaluasi kinerja dosen ditinjau dari prestasi belajar mahasiswa di Jurusan Kebidanan Politeknik Kesehatan Kementerian Kesehatan Kupang tahun 2013. Jurnal Info Kesehatan, 12(1), 622–638. https://jurnal.poltekeskupang.ac.id/index.php/infokes/article/view/46.

Hadiono, A. (2014). Pelayanan akademik dan kinerja dosen sebagai faktor penentu kepuasan mahasiswa STIA Banten. Jurnal Ilmiah Niagara, 7(1), 67–94.

Hartnell, C. A., Ou, A. Y., & Kinicki, A. (2011). Organizational culture and organizational effectiveness: A meta-analytic investigation of the competing values framework’s theoretical suppositions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(4), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021987

Lembaga Penjaminan Mutu Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA. (2016). Standar mutu perguruan tinggi Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. HAMKA. http://repository.uhamka.ac.id/id/eprint/4644/1/STANDAR%20MUTU%20UHAMKA.pdf.

Ningrum, E. (2016). Membangun sinergi pendidikan akademik (S1) dan pendidikan profesi guru (PPG). Jurnal Geografi Gea, 12(2), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.17509/gea.v12i2.1783

Oleksiyenko, A., & Ros, V. (2019). Cambodian lecturers’ pursuit of academic excellence: Expectations vs. reality. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(2), 222–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1621797

Polnaya, I., Nirwanto, N., & Triatmanto, B. (2018). The evaluation of lecturer performance through soft skills, organizational culture and compensation on private university of Ambon. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 17(2). https://www.abacademies.org/articles/the-evaluation-of-lecturer-performance-through-soft-skills-organizational-culture-and-compensation-on-private-university-of-ambon-7163.html

Pramudyo, A. (2010). Analisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kinerja dosen negeri pada Kopertis Wilayah V Yogyakarta. JBTI : Jurnal Bisnis : Teori Dan Implementasi, 1(1), 1–11. https://journal.umy.ac.id/index.php/bti/article/view/2407.

Razak, Y., Syah, D., & Aziz, A. (2017). Kepemimpinan, kinerja dosen dalam peningkatan mutu pendidikan perguruan tinggi. TANZIM: Jurnal Penelitian Manajemen Pendidikan, 1(2), 30–44. http://jurnal.uinbanten.ac.id/index.php/tanzhim/article/view/41.

Retnowati, T. H., Mardapi, D., Kartowagiran, B., & Suranto, S. (2017). Model evaluasi kinerja dosen: Pengembangan instrumen untuk mengevaluasi kinerja dosen. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 21(2), 206–214. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v21i2.16626.

Samian, Y., & Noor, N. M. (2012). Student’s perception on good lecturer based on lecturer performance assessment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 56, 783–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.716.

Sinaga, R. O. L., & Mustikasari, A. (2017). Pengaruh brand image terhadap keputusan pembelian pada Cocorico Cafe & Resto Bandung tahun 2017. EProceedings of Applied Science, 3(2), 258–264. https://openlibrarypublications.telkomuniversity.ac.id/index.php/appliedscience/article/view/3722.

Suheri, A. (2017). Sistem monitoring kinerja dosen dalam kegiatan Tri Dharma perguruan tinggi (Studi kasus STMIK Cilegon). Media Jurnal Informatika, 9(1), 37–48. https://jurnal.unsur.ac.id/mjinformatika/article/view/244.

Sundayana, I. M., Kusuma Dewi, P. D. P., & Megaputri, P. S. (2019). Evaluation of lecturer in higher education curriculum based on the National Standards of Higher Education No. 44 of 2015. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 23(2), 219–229. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v23i2.28141.

Sunoto, A. (2018). Analisis dan desain sistem informasi penilaian kinerja dosen berdasarkan pelaksanaan Tridharma perguruan tinggi (Studi kasus STIKOM Dinamika Bangsa Jambi). Jurnal Ilmiah Media Sisfo, 12(1), 966–985. http://ejournal.stikom-db.ac.id/index.php/mediasisfo/article/view/331.

Suryaman, S. (2018). Indonesian private university lecturer performance improvement model to improve a sustainable organization performance. International Journal of Higher Education, 7(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v7n1p59.

Universitas Brawijaya. (2007). Evaluasi kinerja program studi: Evaluasi kinerja program studi di Universitas Brawijaya. http://digilib.ub.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=59732.

Weinberg, B. A., Hashimoto, M., & Fleisher, B. M. (2009). Evaluating teaching in higher education. The Journal of Economic Education, 40(3), 227–261. https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.40.3.227-261.

Žeravíková, I., Tirpáková, A., & Markechová, D. (2015). The analysis of professional competencies of a lecturer in adult education. SpringerPlus, 4(1), 234. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1014-7.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v26i1.48384