Email this article 
THINK-PAIR-SHARE MODEL AS SOLUTION TO DEVELOP STUDENTS’ CRITICAL THINKING IN ISLAMIC STUDIES: IS IT EFFECTIVE?
Abdul Muhid, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia
Muhammad Thohir,
Abstract
One type of cooperative learning methods is Think Pair Share (TPS). This study aimed at examining the contribution of the TPS method in increasing students' critical thinking in Islamic studies. Particularly, the study investigated the significances of the difference between learned students using TPS method and conventional method, and the effectiveness of TPS learning method. This study used an experimental group and a control group. It is a quasi-experiment with pre-test and post-tests non equivalent control group design. The population of this research are students who take courses in Islamic studies. Samples are taken randomly by taking two classes for an experimental class and a control class. The technique of collecting data was tests, while the technique of data analysis used the statistical technique of t-test (independent and paired samples) within the application of the SPSS release 24 program. The results of the study indicate that there is a significant difference (sig .000) between groups of students who are taught by the TPS Method and conventional Method. In addition, the TPS method has also proven to be effective for teaching Islamic studies which shows a significant difference (sig .000) between the pre-test and post-test.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ashaari, M. F., Ismail, Z., Puteh, A., Samsudin, M. A., Ismail, M., Kawangit, R., & Ramzi, M. I. (2012). An assessment of teaching and learning methodology in Islamic studies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59(October), 618-626. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.322.
Atmaja, I. W. W. (2012). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran kooperatif model (TPS) Think Pair Share vs konvensional model buku teks dengan pengetahuan awal berbeda terhadap hasil belajar kognitif dan afektif mata pelajaran biologi pada pebelajar SMA Negeri 1 Jember. [The effect of cooperative learning strategies TPS (Think Pair Share Model) vs conventional textbook model and prior knowledge on biological cognitive and affective learning outcomes at SMA Negeri 1 Jember]. (Dissertation, Universitas Negeri Malang). http://karya-ilmiah.um.ac.id/index.php/disertasi/article/view/23188.
Bamiro, A. O. (2015). Effects of guided discovery and think-pair-share strategies on secondary school students’ achievement in chemistry. SAGE Open, 5(1), 1-7. doi:10.1177/2158244014564754.
Beetlestone, F. (2012). Creative children, imaginative teaching (N. Yusron, Trans). Bandung: Nusa Media. (Original worked published 1998).
Cahyani, F. (2018). The Use of Think Pair Share Technique to Improve Students’ Speaking Performance. Research in English and Education (READ), 3(1), 76-90. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/ff6f/74f357d686c4fd08455a7098dd1dc3d9a4fc.pdf.
Cahyaningrum, F., Andayani A., Kundharu, S., (2018), Peningkatan Keterampilan Menulis Argumentasi Melalui Model Think Pair Share Audiovisual pada Siswa Kelas X-10 SMA Negeri Kebak Kramat, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 3(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.24832%2Fjpnk.v3i1.605.
Cooper, F. (2018). A modification of think pair share to make it more learner-centered by using student-generated questions. College Teaching, 66(1), 34. doi:10.1080/87567555.2017.1390438.
Ennis, R.H. (1987). A taxonomy of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. In J.B. Baron & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.), Teaching thinking skills: Theory and practice (pp. 9-26). New York: W.H. Freeman.
Ennis, R.H. and Millman, J. (2005). Cornell critical thinking test, level X (Fifth Edition). Seaside, CA: The Critical Thinking Company.
Gillies, R. M., Ashman, A. F., & Terwel, J. (Eds.). (2008). The teacher’s role in implementing cooperative learning in the classroom: An introduction. New York, NY: Springer.
Hetika, H., Farida, I., & Sari, Y. P. (2017). Think Pair Share (TPS) as method to improve student’s learning motivation and learning achievement. Dinamika Pendidikan, 12(9), 125-135. doi:10.15294/dp.v12i2.13561.
Huda, M. (2013). Model-model pengajaran dan pembelajaran. [Teaching and learning models]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Idi, A. (2011). Sosiologi pendidikan individu, masyarakat dan pendidikan. [The sociology of individual education, society and education]. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Lee, H., Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed). New York, NY: Longman.
Li, C.-H., Lin, W.-L., & Wu, M.-H. (2017). The use of a “Think-Pair-Share” brainstorming advance organizer to prepare learners to listen in the L2 classroom. International Journal of Listening, 33(2), 1-14. doi:10.1080/10904018.2017.1394193.
Lyman, F. (1981). The responsive classroom discussion. The Inclusion of All Students. In A. S. Anderson, Mainstreaming Digest (S. 109- 113). College Park, MD: University of Maryland College of Education.
Marzuki, M. & Basariah, B. (2017). The influence of problem-based learning and project citizen model in the civic education learning on student’s critical thinking ability and self discipline. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(3), 382-400. doi:10.21831/cp.v36i3.14675.
McTighe, J., M., & Lyman, F. T. (1988). Cueing thinking in the classroom: The promise of theory-embedded tools. Educational Leadership, 45(7), 18-24. http://www.ascd.org/.
Ramadhanti, D., & Yanda, D. P. (2018). Understanding poetry through the use of cooperative learning model. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(3), 436-446. Doi:10.21831/cp.v38i3.20675.
Rosidin, U., Kadaritna, N., & Hasnunidah, N. (2019). Can argument-driven inquiry models have impact on critical thinking skills for students with different personality types? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(3), 511-526. doi:10.21831/cp.v38i3.24725.
Sagala, Syaiful, Konsep dan Makna Pembelajaran (Bandung : Alfabeta, 2012)
Saguni, F. (2013). Efektivitas metode problem based learning, cooperative learning tipe jigsaw, dan ceramah sebagai problem solving dalam matakuliah perencanaan pembelajaran. [The effectiveness of the problem-based learning, the jigsaw type cooperative learning, and lecturing methods as problem solving in the instructional planning course]. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 32(2), 207-219. doi:10.21831/cp.v0i2.1478.
Shih, Y.-C., & Reynolds, B. L. (2015). Teaching adolescents EFL by integrating Think-Pair-Share and reading teaching adolescents EFL by integrating Think-Pair-Share and reading strategy instruction: A Quasi- Experimental Study. RELC Journal, 46(3), 221-235. doi:10.1177/0033688215589886.
Silberman, M. L. (2014). Active learning: 101 cara belajar siswa aktif. [Active learning: 101 ways of active student learning]. Bandung: Nuansa Cendikia.
Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research and practice (2nd ed). London: Allyn & Bacon.
Suprijono, A. (2013). Cooperative learning teori & aplikasi PAIKEM. [Cooperative learning theory & application of PAIKEM]. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Syafii, M. L. (2018). Using the Think Pair Share strategy to increase students' active involvement and to improve their speaking ability . IJEE (Indonesian Journal of English Education), 5, 62--80. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/ijee.v5i1.7679
Wena, M. (2010). Strategi pembelajaran inovatif kontemporer: Suatu tinjauan konseptual operational. [Contemporary innovative learning strategies: An operational conceptual review]. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Wenger, W. (2008). Beyond teaching and learning (R. Sirait, Trans). Bandung: Nuansa. Pelajar. (Original work published 1992).
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v39i1.28762
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Social Media:
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan by Lembaga Pengembangan dan Penjaminan Mutu Pendidikan UNY is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.uny.ac.id/index.php/cp/index.
