Enhancing student creativity through online learning: A study of SPADA Indonesia in Civic Education courses at Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia and Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Dede Iswandi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Dasim Budimansyah, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Kokom Komalasari, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia
Susan Fitriasari, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Indonesia

Abstract


This study examines the effectiveness of the SPADA Indonesia online learning platform in fostering creativity among students enrolled in Civic Education courses at Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI) and Universitas Lambung Mangkurat (ULM) Banjarmasin. Given the increasing importance of creativity as a critical skill for future graduates, this research aims to explore how the features and interactive elements of SPADA Indonesia contribute to enhancing student creativity within the context of mandatory Civic Education curricula. A total of 90 students participated in this study, comprising 45 from each university, selected through purposive sampling to ensure a diverse representation of experiences and perspectives. Data collection involved pre- and post-intervention surveys, focus group discussions, and observational analysis of student activities within the online platform. The findings reveal that students reported increased engagement, flexibility, and creative problem-solving skills when using SPADA Indonesia for their coursework. Furthermore, the study identifies specific platform aspects—such as interactive modules, collaborative forums, and multimedia resources—that positively impact students' creative capacities. The results suggest that SPADA Indonesia can be a valuable tool in enhancing creativity within Civic Education, with implications for its integration into broader academic curricula. These findings significantly impact the wider scholarly community, potentially shaping the future of education. Recommendations for optimizing the use of online learning platforms to support creative development were discussed.

Keywords


Civic Education; Online Learning; Student Creativity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2021). Online learning in the time of COVID-19: A snapshot of institutional responses across 4 countries. Babson Survey Research Group.

Barnes, & Noble. (2019). The impact of technology on learning and development. Educational Technology Publications.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brett M, & Fischer. (2020). Developing and sustaining creativity: Creative processes in Canadian junior college teachers. Creativity Research Journal, 30(1), 50–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100754

Chang, J. H. (2021). Enhancing creativity through online learning: A case study of SPADA Indonesia. Journal of Educational Technology Research, 12(2), 45–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu12-2.003

Chen, T., Cong, G., Peng, L., Yin, X., Rong, J., & Yang, J. (2020). Analysis of user satisfaction with online education platforms in China during the covid-19 pandemic. Healthcare (Switzerland), 8(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8030200

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Florida, R. (2014). The rise of the creative class revisited. Basic Books.

Garrison, D. R. (2011). E-Learning in the 21st century. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838761

Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. In Educational Researcher (Issue 4). Routledge.

Halimi, M., Rahmat, R., Nugraha, R. A., & Pratiwi, E. D. (2022). Young digital citizen answers: Can online learning improve the quality of civic education learning? Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 19(1), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v19i1.40140

Iswandi, D., Budimansyah, D., Komalasari, K., & Fitriasari, S. (2022). Implementation of SPADA in general Civic Education courses in developing student creativity. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220108.100

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning. Educational Researcher, 21(4), 12–16.

Kharkhurin, A. V. (2014). Creativity 4in1: Four-criterion construct of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26(3), 338–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.929424

Kim, E., Park, H., & Jang, J. U. (2019). Development of a class model for improving creative collaboration based on the online learning system (Moodle) in Korea. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5030067

Mohammed, K. S., Rashid, C. A., Salih, H. A., & Budur, T. (2020). The role of online teaching tools on the perception of the students during the lockdown of Covid-19. International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v7i3p178

Malysheva, O., Tokareva, E., Orchakova, L., & Smirnova, Y. (2022). The effect of online learning in modern history education. Heliyon, 8(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09965

Mao, S., Wang, D., Tang, C., & Dong, P. (2022). Students’ online information searching strategies and their creative question generation: The moderating effect of their need for cognitive closure. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.877061

Miles, M. B. , H. A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Ministry of Education and Culture. (2020). Digital education policy in Indonesia. Ministry of Education and Culture.

Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the quality and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189–1208. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/instance/1089059/pdf/hsresearch00022-0112.pdf

Robinson. (2018). Creative schools: The grassroots revolution that’s transforming education. Penguin Books.

Rosar, M., & Weidlich, J. (2022). Creative students in self-paced online learning environments: an experimental exploration of the interaction of visual design and creativity. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-022-001831

Saba Ayman‐Nolley. (2009). Vygotsky’s perspective on the development of imagination and creativity. June 2013, 37–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419209534424

Suryadi. (2019). The importance of Civic Education in Indonesia’s curriculum. Journal of Civic Education and Social Studies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-019-00018-9

Ting-Toomey, S., & Dorjee, T. (2019). Communicating across cultures. Guilford Press.

Torrance, E. P. (1974). The torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Personnel Press.

Wiratman, A., & Rahmadani, E. (2022). The COVID-19 and online learning: Challenges for university students. 1(3), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.51574/ijrer.v1i2.439


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Our journal indexed by:

 

                     

Supported by:

RJI Main logo

 

Jurnal Civics Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan is published by Univesitas Negeri Yogyakarta in collaboration with Indonesia Association Profession of Pancasila and Civic Education/Asosiasi Profesi Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan (AP3KnI).


Creative Commons License

Jurnal Civics is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

j.civics stat